FORTUNE – Remember those days when Monopoly money was just play cash that bought everything in the game from railroads to houses? When the game was over, the value of that colorful paper currency spiraled to zero. Now with online currencies, the game never really ends. The Internet never shuts off, so the value of money circulating through cyberspace is always worth something.
Last week, new U.S. government rules regulating online currencies affirmed the value of what was previously passed off as funny money. Now companies that issue or exchange online cash would have new bookkeeping requirements. For instance, transactions of more than $10,000 would have to be reported.
While one of the big draws of virtual currencies is that they're independent and generally sheltered from the government's watch, the new rules are unlikely to ruin their allure. If anything, they effectively pull the currencies offline and into the mainstream world of finance, making them infinitely more valuable.
These new regulations come as the popularity of virtual currencies rise, fueled by online merchants that have come up with their own tender and forms of payment -- indeed, a stark contrast from years ago when the European Union thought it was only wise to run the economy on a single currency, the Euro. Needless to say, big problems have followed, and many have wondered if the answer is having multiple competing currencies.
In 2011, Facebook (FB) launched Credits as the de facto form of currency. Though now largely defunct, it's used for purchases made inside games hosted by the social networking site. Last month, Amazon (AMZN) unveiled Amazon Coins, a virtual currency that could be used for purchasing apps, games, and in-apps items on Kindle Fire.
As The Wall Street Journal notes, it's unclear if the new regulations will impact Amazon. One thing is almost certain, though: It will regulate Bitcoin, the fastest-growing online currency. Launched in 2009, the online currency works almost like real money. It can be used to buy anything from upgrades on Reddit to pizza. And as Cyrus Sanati reported in December, it's increasingly used to conduct all sorts of shady business, making the anonymous sale and purchase of everything from drugs to guns possible.
More specifically, the new regulations come at the urging of federal authorities. In April 2011, the FBI recommended that third-party exchanges of Bitcoins be forced to follow the same anti-money laundering rules that banks are supposed to follow.
In the coming years, expect more regulations, experts say. "The government is just catching up," says Edward Castronova, a gamer and telecommunications professor at Indiana University.
The Chinese have been a step ahead of the U.S. In 2009, authorities issued new regulations aimed at restricting the trade and use of online money on worries that currencies used in online games had become so commonplace that they could impact, and possibly destabilize, the real economy.
In the U.S., future rules could either deepen the legitimacy of online currencies or destroy them entirely, depending where lawmakers go from here, Castronova says. Whereas the latest anti-money laundering regulations help their credibility by treating them similarly to traditional money-order providers, levying taxes and transaction fees obviously would hurt their value.
To be sure, the pot of virtual money is nowhere as liquid as traditional cash in the global financial system. But while they play a relatively small role, at least for now, bankers nonetheless view their rise as potentially dangerous to the health of the economy. Because virtual currencies aren't backed by a central bank or controlled by a central administrator, their values are vulnerable to wild swings.
In 2011, the American Bankers Association asked the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to apply consumer financial protection laws uniformly, regardless of whether it's a traditional bank or nonbank payment providers. The fact that bankers are watching online money signals they have potential to help or destroy all that exists in the real world.
The Delafield Fund thinks office-supply giant Staples can fend off a challenge from Amazon.
By Ryan Derousseau
FORTUNE -- Dennis Delafield and Vincent Sellecchia have run the Delafield Fund (DEFIX), which oversees $1.4 billion, since its launch in 1993. They seek turnarounds: undervalued companies with copious cash flow that are grappling with change (an acquisition, a troubled industry, or management) and that they think can rebound in a few years. Their MOREFeb 13, 2013 5:00 AM ET
S&P gives the retailer's bonds a high rating. Moody's says Amazon's debt is just above junk.
FORTUNE -- Amazon's recent $2.5 billion bond offering, if it were listed on the popular retailer's website, would get two very different and confusing reviews: One for nearly five stars; the other for just over one.
Days before the online retailer's late November debt deal, ratings agency Standard & Poor's issued its report on the soon-to-be MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Dec 18, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Facebook isn't the first Internet giant to "break" its IPO price.
FORTUNE -- In all the hubbub over Facebook (FB) shares falling below their $38 IPO price, venture capitalist Bill Gurley reminds us that such a "break" does not necessarily mean that the stock is a long-term dud. From a tweet late Friday:
Like Facebook, Amazon's (AMZN) underwriters had raised the offering range prior to IPO, ultimately pricing at $18 per MOREDan Primack - May 21, 2012 12:53 PM ET
Ducking sales tax is great for Web shoppers but a killer for local governments that are losing out on billions in revenue.
By Becky Quick, contributor
FORTUNE -- If I want to buy the hot new videogame Mass Effect 3 and have it delivered to my home in New Jersey, I have a few choices. I can go to Amazon.com and pay $59.99. Or I can go to BestBuy.com and pay $59.99, plus MOREMar 27, 2012 5:00 AM ET
By Bruce Roberts, contributor
Close your eyes. Imagine, if you will, a startup that meets the following criteria:
Their recruiting process is fundamentally flawed
Their operations are a mess
They make engineers pretty much do everything, which leaves almost no time for coding
They don't (care) about charity or helping the needy or community contributions or anything like it
Their facilities are dirt-smeared cube farms without a dime spent on decor or common meeting areas
Their pay and MORE
Amazon.com is a retail powerhouse. But why are investors so enamored with its shares as it continues to produce disappointing profit growth?
FORTUNE -- Ah, Wall Street. You're always surprising us, aren't you? When Amazon.com reported earnings on Monday, you did the opposite of what we might expect. The online retailer's profits were down -- below expectations, even -- and yet you decided that the appropriate response was to bid up MOREDuff McDonald, Contributing Editor - Apr 28, 2011 2:53 PM ET
Lots of blog buzz today about how Amazon.com (AMZN) is selling $20 gift cards for just $10. It's being done through online deals site LivingSocial, a Groupon rival that recently raised $182 million in VC funding from Amazon and others.
So this obviously is a (brilliant) customer acquisition play by LivingSocial, with a big hand from its largest investor. And Amazon probably assumes that the $6 million-plus it is "losing" in sales revenue will be outweighed MOREDan Primack - Jan 19, 2011 2:32 PM ET
That Barnes & Noble is in play is no big shock. What's strange, however, is how much so many of us seem to care.
Today's big M&A news comes from the world of brick-and-mortar bookstores, as Borders (BGP) has offered to merge with larger rival Barnes & Noble (BKS).
More specifically, Borders shareholder Pershing Square Capital Management -- a hedge fund managed by William Ackman -- would finance a $16 per share acquisition (20% premium MOREDan Primack - Dec 6, 2010 3:25 PM ET
The Term Sheet sends out an email each morning (sign up here), which includes blurbs on all of the day's venture capital and private equity news, plus any other notable M&A activities. It also picks one deal to highlight. Here is what got today's top billing:
LivingSocial, a Washington, D.C.-based online deals site, has secured a $175 million investment from Amazon.com (AMZN). It also raised $7 million in new funding from existing MOREDan Primack - Dec 3, 2010 10:33 AM ET
|McDonald's gives Charles Ramsey free food for a year|
|Where your donation dollars go|
|Doomsday investors betting on market crash|
|Hedge fund guru says moms and trading don't mix|
|Investors consider life after Fed stimulus|