FORTUNE -- At first glance, you would think that the CEOs of taxophobic U.S. corporations and our less-than-stellar leaders in Washington have nothing in common. But you'd be wrong. What they share is a lack of shame and an excess of narrow thinking.
The similarity between C-suite tax avoiders and Washington reality avoiders struck me as I watched the debt-ceiling and government-shutdown debacle unfold. Listening to politicians say "This is what voters in my district want" reminded me of watching Apple (AAPL) chief executive Tim Cook invoke "shareholder value" during his May testimony at a Senate hearing that focused on the extraordinary games that Apple plays to avoid paying U.S. taxes on what anyone other than a tax lawyer would consider U.S. income. Not only was Cook not visibly embarrassed, but he actually seemed proud of what the company was doing.
Pols and CEOs both justify their actions by citing obligations to their narrow constituencies. The fact that all Americans, conservative and liberal alike, would realize long-term benefits from having a functional government with predictable finances? The fact that shareholders would ultimately realize serious value from an increase in our nation's well-being if bigtime corporate tax avoiders decided they had an obligation to help pay for public education and infrastructure? Well, that's when people trot out the John Maynard Keynes line, "In the long run, we are all dead."
Look, it's easy to understand why companies (perfectly legally) avoid taxes. Lower taxes mean higher profits, which presumably translate into higher stock prices. However, going to extraordinary lengths to avoid taxes helps undermine companies' long-term interests by hurting society and by giving average people yet another reason to detest Big Business.
It's also easy to understand why politicians would rather pander to their constituents than act in the national interest. It's safer. If you're a Tea Party type who compromises or a liberal who tells Social Security recipients that the program in its current form is unsustainable, you risk losing your job.
I have a belief, possibly naive, that when you're entrusted with corporate or political leadership, you're supposed to lead rather than stick your finger in the air, divine the prevailing wind, and follow it. But maybe that's just me.
However, I actually see a few glimmers of hope. Some of the fanatics who caused the government shutdown and fomented the debt-ceiling crisis are catching heat for having damaged conservatives' long-term interests. Which, in fact, they did. And I've even seen a company do the right thing because it was embarrassed. Not in the U.S., but in England, where an uproar erupted last year after a superb series by Reuters (see bottom of page) about the tax-avoidance games played by Starbucks (SBUX), which, Reuters reported, told shareholders it was making big profits in England but filed U.K. tax returns showing losses. My favorite part was Starbucks U.K. buying coffee beans from a Swiss affiliate that benefited from an agricultural tax break.
As a result of the blowback, Starbucks paid £10 million (about $16 million) of U.K. taxes voluntarily. Hello? What's going on? I asked Starbucks why it was voluntarily paying taxes. The answer, from Corey duBrowa, Starbucks' senior vice president for global communications: "We believe that acting responsibly makes good business sense, and the payment of corporate tax in the U.K. is a good example of this ethos in action."
Alas, two other U.S. companies harpooned by Reuters -- Google (GOOG) and Amazon (AMZN) -- felt no obligation to do anything. But Starbucks' deciding that it's good business to pay taxes is really encouraging. So is the intra-conservative debate between pragmatists and fanatics. Liberals may be next. If we get lucky, shame and political compromise may yet become trendy.
Reuters' 2012 special report
How Starbucks avoids UK taxes
Amazon's billion-dollar tax shield
Starbucks's European tax bill disappears down $100 million hole
How the UK tax authority got cozy with big business
EBay's double tax base prompts calls for investigation
Reuters' coverage of Google's tax strategy this year
This story is from the November 18, 2013 issue of Fortune.
A letter to Katharine Graham offers an early window into how Warren Buffett thinks about investing.
FORTUNE -- One of the (many) things that surprised people about the recent $250 million sale of the Washington Post to Amazon (AMZN) founder Jeff Bezos was the health of the Washington Post's pension plan. At a time when most pension plans are struggling, the Post has $1 billion more than it needs. (As part of the MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Aug 15, 2013 7:00 AM ET
No matter what Jeff Bezos says now, once his purchase of the Post closes, he's almost certain to begin imposing his standards and beliefs in its pages.
FORTUNE -- When I first heard that Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon.com, was a Libertarian, I laughed out loud, because I thought it was a joke. Bezos's company, after all, is based on the Internet, which was created during the Cold War by a military research-and-development MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Aug 15, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Is Jeff Bezos' purchase of the Washington Post a problem for Amazon shareholders?
FORTUNE -- Did you hear that Jeff Bezos has agreed to purchase The Washington Post for $250 million? Of course you did, because you're a news consumer and your purveyors (i.e., me and my peers) are collectively obsessed by what happens in our own boardrooms.
And what you probably read were glowing accounts of how the Amazon (AMZN) founder MOREDan Primack - Aug 12, 2013 10:58 AM ET
The CEO tells Fortune why he sold his family's paper to Jeff Bezos, and what's next for the soon-to-be renamed Washington Post Co.
FORTUNE -- Donald E. Graham, the chairman and CEO of the Washington Post Co. (WPO) says he is "feeling good" about the company's sale of its flagship newspaper and other publishing businesses to Amazon (AMZN) CEO Jeff Bezos for $250 million in cash.
"I'm obviously very sad about our company MOREStephanie N. Mehta, Deputy Managing Editor - Aug 6, 2013 12:48 PM ET
Despite his recent acquisitions, Warren Buffett may not be as optimistic about the future of print as some people think.
FORTUNE -- With the sale of the Washington Post, Warren Buffett is once again showing the limits of his love affair with newspapers.
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA) is the largest outside investor in The Washington Post Co. (WPO) and has held the stock for four decades. Berkshire holds just over 1.7 MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Aug 6, 2013 5:00 AM ET
The Washington Post gets a new owner.
FORTUNE -- Rich guys used to boost their status by purchasing professional sports franchises. Now the game of 1 percentmanship has extended into the newspaper realm.
Amazon (AMZN) founder and CEO Jeff Bezos today announced that he will acquire The Washington Post newspaper and related properties from The Washington Post Co. (WPO). The deal is valued at $250 million, and includes several regional and special-interest MOREDan Primack - Aug 5, 2013 5:01 PM ET
Oracle, Google, and Amazon are just a few of the hundreds of large companies that have cut confidential deals with the IRS to help lower their tax bills, and critics want the agency to disclose the details of these complex pacts.
By Lynnley Browning
FORTUNE -- When Oracle reported its latest quarterly earnings last month, most investors focused on the fact that its dividend doubled. The number that got less notice MOREJul 22, 2013 5:00 AM ET
New federal regulations make online currencies act more like traditional forms of cash.
FORTUNE – Remember those days when Monopoly money was just play cash that bought everything in the game from railroads to houses? When the game was over, the value of that colorful paper currency spiraled to zero. Now with online currencies, the game never really ends. The Internet never shuts off, so the value of money circulating through MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Mar 25, 2013 11:00 AM ET
The Delafield Fund thinks office-supply giant Staples can fend off a challenge from Amazon.
By Ryan Derousseau
FORTUNE -- Dennis Delafield and Vincent Sellecchia have run the Delafield Fund (DEFIX), which oversees $1.4 billion, since its launch in 1993. They seek turnarounds: undervalued companies with copious cash flow that are grappling with change (an acquisition, a troubled industry, or management) and that they think can rebound in a few years. Their MOREFeb 13, 2013 5:00 AM ET
|Someone bought a $100,000 Tesla with Bitcoins|
|Economy is improving but why doesn't it feel that way?|
|Where should you put your money now?|
|2 million Facebook, Gmail and Twitter passwords stolen in massive hack|
|Ron Paul: Bitcoin could 'destroy the dollar'|