FORTUNE -- At first glance, you would think that the CEOs of taxophobic U.S. corporations and our less-than-stellar leaders in Washington have nothing in common. But you'd be wrong. What they share is a lack of shame and an excess of narrow thinking.
The similarity between C-suite tax avoiders and Washington reality avoiders struck me as I watched the debt-ceiling and government-shutdown debacle unfold. Listening to politicians say "This is what voters in my district want" reminded me of watching Apple (AAPL) chief executive Tim Cook invoke "shareholder value" during his May testimony at a Senate hearing that focused on the extraordinary games that Apple plays to avoid paying U.S. taxes on what anyone other than a tax lawyer would consider U.S. income. Not only was Cook not visibly embarrassed, but he actually seemed proud of what the company was doing.
Pols and CEOs both justify their actions by citing obligations to their narrow constituencies. The fact that all Americans, conservative and liberal alike, would realize long-term benefits from having a functional government with predictable finances? The fact that shareholders would ultimately realize serious value from an increase in our nation's well-being if bigtime corporate tax avoiders decided they had an obligation to help pay for public education and infrastructure? Well, that's when people trot out the John Maynard Keynes line, "In the long run, we are all dead."
Look, it's easy to understand why companies (perfectly legally) avoid taxes. Lower taxes mean higher profits, which presumably translate into higher stock prices. However, going to extraordinary lengths to avoid taxes helps undermine companies' long-term interests by hurting society and by giving average people yet another reason to detest Big Business.
It's also easy to understand why politicians would rather pander to their constituents than act in the national interest. It's safer. If you're a Tea Party type who compromises or a liberal who tells Social Security recipients that the program in its current form is unsustainable, you risk losing your job.
I have a belief, possibly naive, that when you're entrusted with corporate or political leadership, you're supposed to lead rather than stick your finger in the air, divine the prevailing wind, and follow it. But maybe that's just me.
However, I actually see a few glimmers of hope. Some of the fanatics who caused the government shutdown and fomented the debt-ceiling crisis are catching heat for having damaged conservatives' long-term interests. Which, in fact, they did. And I've even seen a company do the right thing because it was embarrassed. Not in the U.S., but in England, where an uproar erupted last year after a superb series by Reuters (see bottom of page) about the tax-avoidance games played by Starbucks (SBUX), which, Reuters reported, told shareholders it was making big profits in England but filed U.K. tax returns showing losses. My favorite part was Starbucks U.K. buying coffee beans from a Swiss affiliate that benefited from an agricultural tax break.
As a result of the blowback, Starbucks paid £10 million (about $16 million) of U.K. taxes voluntarily. Hello? What's going on? I asked Starbucks why it was voluntarily paying taxes. The answer, from Corey duBrowa, Starbucks' senior vice president for global communications: "We believe that acting responsibly makes good business sense, and the payment of corporate tax in the U.K. is a good example of this ethos in action."
Alas, two other U.S. companies harpooned by Reuters -- Google (GOOG) and Amazon (AMZN) -- felt no obligation to do anything. But Starbucks' deciding that it's good business to pay taxes is really encouraging. So is the intra-conservative debate between pragmatists and fanatics. Liberals may be next. If we get lucky, shame and political compromise may yet become trendy.
Reuters' 2012 special report
How Starbucks avoids UK taxes
Amazon's billion-dollar tax shield
Starbucks's European tax bill disappears down $100 million hole
How the UK tax authority got cozy with big business
EBay's double tax base prompts calls for investigation
Reuters' coverage of Google's tax strategy this year
This story is from the November 18, 2013 issue of Fortune.
What Carl Icahn wants from Apple.
FORTUNE -- Carl Icahn this morning launched his new website, which includes a letter to Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook.
In it, Icahn details how he has increased his stake in Apple to 4.73 million shares (valued at around $2.5 billion, with plans to buy more), and how he remains convinced that the company should launch a $150 billion share buyback. Icahn also takes great care MOREDan Primack - Oct 24, 2013 9:54 AM ET
Activist investors are getting more powerful and more determined than ever to take on the managements of public companies. The surprise is just how giant that prey has become.
By Geoff Colvin, senior editor-at-large
FORTUNE -- Talk candidly with corporate directors and they'll tell you their No. 1 worry is no longer the economy or the chance of an accounting scandal -- it's activist investors. That's because activists have taken on MORESep 23, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Decelerating investment in housing, infrastructure and manufacturing, is dragging on incomes.
By John Foley, Reuters Breakingviews
FORTUNE -- Consumer brands in China are finding their rewards aren't quite as advertised. Growth in purchases of a wide range of goods has slowed sharply over the past year, and companies ranging from Samsonite to Apple (AAPL) are reporting disappointing Chinese sales figures. Consumers in the world's second-largest economy will have their day, but the MOREAug 30, 2013 9:30 AM ET
Activist makes his next big tech move.
FORTUNE -- Earlier this week Carl Icahn told us to watch his Twitter feed. Now we know why:
No word yet on exactly how many Apple (AAPL) shares Icahn holds, or what Cook's response was to Icahn's overture. Apple stock had been relatively flat before Icahn's tweets, but by 2:50pm was up more than $17 per share (3.66%). For the year, Apple is down more MOREDan Primack - Aug 13, 2013 2:28 PM ET
Oracle, Google, and Amazon are just a few of the hundreds of large companies that have cut confidential deals with the IRS to help lower their tax bills, and critics want the agency to disclose the details of these complex pacts.
By Lynnley Browning
FORTUNE -- When Oracle reported its latest quarterly earnings last month, most investors focused on the fact that its dividend doubled. The number that got less notice MOREJul 22, 2013 5:00 AM ET
When venture capitalist John Malloy first invested in Waze, the company was worth just a few million dollars. Now Google is paying more than $1 billion for it. Malloy explains what he saw back in 2008, and why his bet paid off.
FORTUNE -- Google (GOOG) this week announced that it will buy social mapping company Waze for a reported $1.1 billion, beating out earlier suitors like Apple (AAPL) and Facebook MOREDan Primack - Jun 13, 2013 3:18 PM ET
Tax avoidance works beautifully -- and legally -- for Apple and other multinationals. Why not make it work for you?
FORTUNE -- It's faddish -- and fun -- these days to talk about the income taxes that Apple does or doesn't pay. Hey, as we learned this week from a Senate report and hearings, Apple's tax strategems are even slicker than its products are. Many of them involve the "intellectual property" MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - May 23, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Kodak was killed by phones, not film.
By Andrew Parker, contributor
FORTUNE -- Apple (AAPL) is running a new ad in which there is one simple line of dialog: "
Every day, more photos are taken with the iPhone than any other camera."
Simple, tight, concise message. And the ad is beautiful.
When I saw this ad, my first reaction was a simple, emotional response to the raw, human editing style.
But then on further reflection, I MOREMay 3, 2013 11:41 AM ET
A lower corporate tax rate won't deter companies from playing tax and accounting games. Just look at Apple's math.
FORTUNE -- There's a widely shared idea that if the U.S. reduced its corporate income tax rate to 25% from the current 35%, big corporations would stop playing tax games. They would then pour all their attention into profit-making rather than allocating a ton of talent to tax avoidance, and we would MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Apr 26, 2013 5:00 AM ET
|I work 4 jobs and I'm still struggling|
|Military retirees: You betrayed us, Congress|
|Instagram launches direct messaging|
|Apple supplier draws scrutiny after worker deaths|
|Twitter restores blocking function after outcry|