By Sanjay Sanghoee
FORTUNE – The future of Netflix (NFLX) could soon change dramatically, now that Comcast (CMSCA) has agreed to buy rival Time Warner Cable (TWC) in a $45 billion deal that would combine America's two biggest cable companies.
With 44 million subscribers, Netflix has established itself as a leading player in the market for online on-demand video programming, and cable, telephony, and satellite companies are under serious pressure. Comcast cited competition from Netflix as one reason for acquiring Time Warner. And to take on the combined muscles of Comcast and Time Warner, Verizon (VZ), AT&T (T), Charter Communications (CHTR) (which lost its bid for Time Warner), DirecTV (DTV), and DISH Network (DISH) will now need even more traction.
Given the competition, Netflix could be an attractive candidate for an acquisition, or at least a major investment.
Even though Comcast is a content producer (it owns NBC Universal), cable, and online distributor (it owns a piece of Hulu), and is promoting HBO GO by making it available without a cable subscription, that doesn't mean that the company may not want to expand its share of the pie through Netflix. For one, Comcast-Time Warner could widen its effective reach without violating the 30% pay-TV market cap that the government imposes on cable companies. What's more, a combination with Netflix would create synergies for licensing content.
As I wrote in an earlier piece, Netflix's current offerings of licensed content are lackluster and create an opportunity for a more robust partnership between the company and content producers.
As for Verizon and others who do not have direct content relationships, the need to make a deal with Netflix is even more pressing. While the recent court order striking down the Federal Communications Commission's open-Internet rules gives network providers the ability to slow down Netflix's service over their systems, it is unclear whether they can afford to exercise that power given the popularity of Netflix and a possible public backlash against a restricted Internet. The point is that both sides have good reason to explore a deal.
Another factor in favor of a transaction is that Netflix needs both new and original content to stay attractive to subscribers. The company will spend $3 billion in 2014 for content, including to develop original shows, which is 60% of the revenue projected by Morgan Stanley analysts for this year.
While Netflix reported $1.2 billion of cash and equivalents at the end of 2013, it also anticipates high expenditures and may have to raise capital to finance its plans. This means that the company should welcome a partnership with a deep-pocketed player.
Finally, there is Amazon (AMZN), a major competitor to Netflix and also a possible suitor. Amazon's strategy is to leverage its 10 million strong Prime subscriber base to sell streaming content, but if the company raises its Prime fee, those numbers could fall fast and make Netflix a smart acquisition, both for streaming and cross-marketing purposes.
Amazon offers newer movies and television episodes than Netflix, but lacks the popularity of Netflix, which makes them complementary. Amazon also has the cash to finance Netflix's original shows and to pay for faster delivery over distribution networks.
Regardless of who ultimately makes a move, the point is that Netflix is ripe for some type of transaction, and investors should take note.
Correction: An earlier version of this article suggested Netflix is expected to spend $3 billion to acquire new shows only. This figure represents spending on total acquisitions, not exclusively for new programming.
Sanjay Sanghoee is a political and business commentator. He has worked at investment banks Lazard Freres and Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, as well as at hedge fund Ramius. Sanghoee sits on the Board of Davidson Media Group, a mid-market radio station operator, and has an MBA from Columbia Business School. He is also the author of two thriller novels.
America's biggest companies smashed records for earnings in 2011. Too bad the party can't last.
FORTUNE -- Given the sluggish recovery and a strapped consumer, you'd expect to see corporate America trudging along, not racing for glory. In fact, the Fortune 500 are thriving as a group. Unlike the U.S. economy, they've shown quicksilver agility, rapidly shifting their product mix and producing more goods at little new cost. This nimbleness belies MOREShawn Tully, senior editor-at-large - May 7, 2012 12:00 PM ET
Year's largest M&A deal bites the dust.
AT&T (T) this evening announced that it has agreed to end its $39 billion bid to buy wireless carrier T-Mobile from Deutsche Telekom, following objections from U.S. regulators. In a statement, AT&T said:
The actions by the Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Justice to block this transaction do not change the realities of the U.S. wireless industry. It is one of the most MOREDan Primack - Dec 19, 2011 7:30 PM ET
Bank analysts covering AT&T (T) are beginning to chime in on the Department of Justice's attempt to kill the telecom giant's proposed $38 billion acquisition of T-Mobile. Here is a sampling:
James Radcliffe of Barclays Capital
"We believe that the deal is by no means dead, as the DOJ has stated that the "door is open" for AT&T to propose remedies, but the fact that the DOJ took this strong step this early in MORE
The year's second-largest merger suddenly faces a giant roadblock.
The U.S. Department of Justice has sued to block AT&T's (T) planned $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile from Germany's Deutsche Telekom, on antitrust grounds. FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski also said today that the proposed tie-up raised "serious concerns" for his agency.
AT&T expressed surprise at the move, and said it would defend the merger in court.
AT&T shares are off more than 4.5% on the MOREDan Primack - Aug 31, 2011 11:04 AM ET
The Mail Room Fund launched three years ago to a flurry of Hollywood fanfare. Now it has disappeared with nary a whimper.
Venture capital goes Hollywood.
That was the message in March 2008, when Silicon Valley stalwarts Accel Partners and Venrock partnered with the William Morris Agency and AT&T (T) to invest in Southern California's early-stage digital media market. They called their brainchild The Mail Room Funds, as an homage to the legendary MOREDan Primack - Apr 25, 2011 2:30 PM ET
JPMorgan's chief banker Jes Staley talks about the AT&T-T-Mobile deal, how the firm responded to the Japan crisis, and why Facebook's valuation might be justified.
FORTUNE - With its role advising AT&T on its proposed $39 billion purchase of T-Mobile, JPMorgan Chase has solidified its lead atop the mergers and acquisitions league tables in 2011. There's been a lot of talk about the $20 billion bridge loan that JPMorgan Chase threw MOREDuff McDonald, Contributing Editor - Mar 24, 2011 1:52 PM ET
Thomson Reuters has sent over some data on where AT&T's (T) planned $39 billion purchase of T-Mobile ranks in the annals of mergers and acquisitions:
* It is the year's second-largest M&A transaction, behind only AIG's $59 billion restructuring. And, since that AIG deal doesn't really deserve to qualify as M&A, I say that AT&T-Mobile stands atop the 2011 leader-board (at least for now).
* It is the largest telecom M&A transaction since MOREDan Primack - Mar 21, 2011 3:44 PM ET
AT&T (T) today announced plans to buy T-Mobile from Deutsche Telekom, in a $39 billion cash and stock deal that will create the nation's largest mobile carrier (by a significant margin).
I guess it also means that T-Mobile will have to change up its recent ad strategy, which has used the old Mac vs. PC framework to disparage AT&T's service. Here's a couple for posterity:Dan Primack - Mar 20, 2011 3:31 PM ET
|AT&T cuts prices again|
|Can Fox's reboot of 'Cosmos' find an audience?|
|Winners and losers of the bull market|
|The medical marijuana ad that never aired, despite contrary media headlines|
|How to tell your kid you can't afford her dream college|