FORTUNE -- If you are wondering why you can't get a mortgage, here's an answer: Every time JPMorgan Chase makes a home loan, it loses money, $1,500 on average. That might not make JPMorgan want to make so many loans.
That helps explain why banks are lending so little, and why the housing recovery, which seemed to be zooming along just a few months ago, has begun to falter. It also may say something about the sluggish economic recovery.
On Friday, JPMorgan (JPM) reported its first-quarter earnings. They were less impressive than analysts were expecting, in part because loan growth at the nation's largest bank in the country has evaporated. JPMorgan had $730 billion in loans a year ago. It has the same now. Deposits are still rolling in. Typically, a bank makes money lending out the money it takes in from depositors and pocketing the difference. But JPMorgan is now lending out just 57% of its deposits. It used to be more like 80% a few years ago.
Signing up borrowers was never the most profitable part of the mortgage business. The bigger profits came from collecting the interest on the loans, or selling those loans off to others. But it was never a loss leader, either.
A year ago, for instance, JPMorgan made about $750 per loan. The year before that, it booked $3,300 of profits for every new loan.
But then, about a year ago, interest rates began to rise for the first time since the financial crisis. It wasn't much, around one percentage point, but it was enough to crater one of the few businesses for the banks that had come roaring back. And the housing market remains fragile. All of a sudden, all those people who were rushing into refinance their mortgages every time rates dropped stopped coming in.
JPMorgan funded $53 billion in mortgage loans in the first three months of 2013. That shrank to $17 billion in the first three months of this year. And JPMorgan is based on being big. The result is that you don't just make less when you make fewer loans. You make nothing. A year ago, JPMorgan earned $500 million in the first quarter from originating home loans. In the first three months of 2014, it lost $200 million.
That might not be all that bad if JPMorgan were still making good money on the other parts of the mortgage process, like collecting interest or selling off loans. But it's not. Interest rates are still near lows. What's more, the rise in interest rates has squeezed the difference between what banks can charge mortgage borrowers and the interest they have to promise the purchasers of those loans. That difference a year or so ago accounted for a huge source of profits.
Put it all together and JPMorgan made just $114 million in income from its entire mortgage operations in the first quarter. That was down from nearly $700 million a year ago and $1.1 billion the quarter after that. But bankers like to talk about their businesses not in total profits but the returns they generate. Three quarters ago, JPMorgan's mortgage business had a return on investment of 23%. Last quarter, it was 3%. JPMorgan could have almost done just as well by putting all of its money in a 10-year Treasury bond and calling it a day.
And it's not just the mortgage business. Over the past few years, consumers and businesses -- some not so great -- have been able to secure loans at historically low interest rates. Expectations adjust. Now, interest rates are rising, and borrowers don't want to pay higher prices. How long will it be before borrowers adjust? If you have just refinanced your 30-year mortgage, it might be a while.
If you want to know what higher interest rates might mean for the banks, take a look at JPMorgan's mortgage business. It's not good.
We know, you're shocked. Economists at the San Francisco Fed said the central bank is very unlikely to lose money on its $4 trillion portfolio.
FORTUNE -- The Federal Reserve says it's fit enough to weather economic stress as well.
Last week, the Fed released the results of its annual stress test of the nation's largest banks. Nearly all of the banks came out with a clean bill of health. Monday, the MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Mar 24, 2014 3:59 PM ET
Federal Reserve says 29 of the nation's 30 largest banks could survive a severe economic meltdown.
FORTUNE -- The nation's largest banks passed the Federal Reserve's stress test with their best grade ever.
Of the 30 banks tested by the Fed, 29 were deemed strong enough to weather a severe economic meltdown without any assistance from the government. Collectively the banks cleared the test by a wider margin than a year ago. MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Mar 20, 2014 4:24 PM ET
Regulators have grown increasingly concerned about banks' interest rate risk.
FORTUNE -- The Federal Reserve may not be satisfied with some of the results of the annual bank stress tests.
The first indication of how the banks did on those tests is set to be released on Thursday, March 20. It has been widely anticipated that all the major banks will pass.
But a source who is involved in the stress-testing process says MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Mar 17, 2014 5:00 AM ET
Despite recovery, key lending measure is still down.
FORTUNE -- Not only have the nation's banks fully recovered from the financial crisis, their bottom lines are now healthier than ever.
On Wednesday, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said profits at U.S. lenders hit an all-time high in 2013. For the year, the nation's banks made a collective $155 billion. That's up 10% from a year ago, and it was more than the MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Feb 26, 2014 10:21 AM ET
The supervisors at the Fed are right to set some boundaries to protect both America and foreign countries from financial risk-takers.
By Sheila Bair
FORTUNE -- It never ceases to amaze me how sound bites can drive the debate over financial reform. Take reaction to the Federal Reserve Bank's decision last week to impose on the U.S. operations of foreign banks roughly the same capital and liquidity requirements applicable to our MOREFeb 24, 2014 9:47 AM ET
If the investment bank was beaten by Washington, it didn't lose by much.
FORTUNE -- Goldman Sachs' announcement last week that its fourth-quarter earnings fell 19% from a year ago was greeted as a watershed moment.
New York magazine suggested Goldman (GS) bankers switch from Dom to André. The New York Times called Goldman wary, with a key unit in continued decline and facing uncertain regulations. Politico took the occasion to MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 21, 2014 12:57 PM ET
A drop in compensation and a boost from deals like Twitter's IPO helped the bank rebound from a disappointing third quarter.
FORTUNE -- Goldman Sachs' profits in the last three months of 2013 fell 19% from a year earlier to $2.3 billion, but the earnings were much better than analysts had expected.
"We believe that we are well positioned to generate solid returns as the economy continues to heal and provide considerable MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 16, 2014 8:17 AM ET
JPMorgan Chase's earnings showed that one measure of the U.S.'s financial health still hasn't recovered.Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 14, 2014 3:52 PM ET
Santander has fallen woefully short of its chairman's growth targets, and it's not clear things are improving.
FORTUNE -- In early December, Banco Santander spent $650 million to buy an 8% stake in the Bank of Shanghai. For Santander (SAN), Spain's largest bank, the deal looks to be another case of wrong place, wrong time.
It's also the latest example of Santander's hard-charging chairman Emilio Botín's long-running growth strategy. Botín has pursued acquisitions MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 3, 2014 11:38 AM ET
|GM's recalled Cobalt was a failure from the start|
|Pope Francis challenges the free market - The Buzz|
|Why you should pay off your car loan ASAP|
|Americans have fallen in love with real estate once again|
|Your Internet security relies on a few volunteers|