By Sheila Bair
FORTUNE -- Hark. Do you hear it? That sound of ringing bells coming from the nation's capital as we enter the holiday season? Is it Salvation Army Santas taking to the street corners? Church campaniles playing "Carol of the Bells?" Or maybe angels getting their wings a la the Christmas classic It's a Wonderful Life?
Nope. It's the ka-ching of K Street lobbyists ringing up the billable hours as they pile into the newest industry battle against financial reform. I am speaking of nascent efforts to regulate the multi-trillion dollar asset management industry. This war promises to be even bigger than the one megabanks have waged against the Volcker rule's proposed ban on speculative trading.
The shot heard 'round the beltway was a seemingly innocuous report by a government research group called, appropriately, the Office of Financial Research or "OFR." The OFR was created by the Dodd-Frank financial reform law to -- among other things -- conduct and sponsor research related to "financial stability." That seems reasonable after the 2008 financial crisis nearly brought down the world economy.
The OFR was asked by its parent agency, a group of major financial regulatory heads called the Financial Stability Oversight Council or "FSOC," to look at potential risks associated with asset managers. These entities -- which include mutual funds, private equity and hedge funds, as well as the asset management divisions of insurance companies and banks -- collectively control about $53 trillion of assets. Ten firms each individually control over $1 trillion in assets with the largest, by far, being BlackRock (BLK), which manages $4.1 trillion.
While acknowledging the lack of complete data to conduct the analysis, the OFR report had, I thought, some useful observations about things asset managers do that are frighteningly similar to the kinds of things that banks did in the lead-up to the financial crisis. You know, things like excessive leverage (yes, a number of them do use significant leverage to enhance returns), taking big risks to reach for yield, mismatching assets and liabilities, and putting assets in separate accounts that are not transparent to regulators or their public investors.
Was the report perfect? No. Is anything? But its primary purpose, as I understand it, was simply to help FSOC look outside of the regulated banking system to learn more about the business and activities of asset managers so it could determine if there were any risks that might threaten markets and the economy. That is what the FSOC and OFR are supposed to do.
People love to beat up on the big banks (and I do my fair share), but believe it or not, they were not the root of all evil in 2008. Asset managers and insurance companies also created significant problems. As you will recall, taxpayers had to risk trillions in government support to bailout both the American Insurance Group, a.k.a. AIG (AIG), as well as the money market/mutual fund industry. What's more, it is important to understand that when we bailed out the banks, we also bailed out these nonbank institutions, as some were heavily invested in bank debt or were standing on the other side of bank derivatives trades. Without the bank bailouts, these nonbanks could have taken big losses.
Yet, based on the fund industry's holier-than-thou attack on poor OFR, you would think they were trying to protect Cindy Lou's Christmas against the evil Grinch. The industry's biggest fear seems to be that this report is the precursor to the FSOC designating big firms like BlackRock and Fidelity as "systemic" meaning (gasp) that they would be subject to tougher regulation by the Federal Reserve Board.
I think the industry is jumping to conclusions. If I were they, I'd save my money for employee Christmas bonuses and tell the lobbyists to stand down. The FSOC is only beginning to analyze the issues identified in the OFR report, and there are many different ways the regulators could respond. Some of the issues could be addressed with better disclosure. Others, like leverage and liquidity, could be addressed with some simple, basic standards set by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC already regulates the big asset managers to protect those who invest in their funds. The agency has not, traditionally, looked at this industry from the standpoint of broader risks to the financial system, but that doesn't mean it couldn't start.
True, the FSOC might ultimately decide that some individual asset managers are too big and interconnected to fail without disrupting the broader economy. But the answer is not necessarily to designate them as "systemic" and push them into the arms of the Fed.
A better alternative would be for those firms to become simpler, smaller, and less interconnected. Dodd-Frank's "systemic designation" was meant to put large firms on the government's "naughty list." Intrusive Fed supervision was meant to be their lump of coal. Under the law, they still have the option of getting on the "nice" list of un-systemic institutions by restructuring and downsizing.
Now wouldn't that be a nice Christmas present for us all?
Banks representing the nation's largest bond investors sued the city of Richmond, which last week took steps to take over underwater mortgages through eminent domain.Nin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Aug 9, 2013 11:54 AM ET
BlackRock's CEO says that the U.S. may need to make retirement savings mandatory.
FORTUNE -- BlackRock Inc. chief executive Larry Fink said during a speech Tuesday that longer life spans and underfunded retirement plans are the defining challenge of our age, and went so far as to recommend that the U.S. consider making retirement savings mandatory.
Fink acknowledged that retirement under-funding is not a new issue, but times have changed and the MOREKatie Benner - May 7, 2013 2:20 PM ET
Hedge funds are scooping up personal property tax liens from municipalities at a quick pace after big banks decided it was too risky.
By Lynnley Browning
FORTUNE -- Hedge fund executives who descended on Miami last month for a conference on unpaid property taxes were treated to waterfront cruises of estates owned by Madonna, Shaquille O'Neal, and Elizabeth Taylor. But unlike those celebrity residences, the houses the profit-chasing investors were hunting MOREMay 1, 2013 11:47 AM ET
Top strategist at Blackrock says the economy is stronger than it looks, which will lead to rising interest rates and pain for debt investors. But the evidence otherwise is too strong.
FORTUNE -- Ben Bernanke is missing the recovery.
That's the view of Blackrock strategist Rick Rieder. In an interview with the Financial Times, Rieder, who is officially Blackrock's chief investment officer for fixed income, fundamental portfolios, said it's time for the MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Apr 10, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Vanguard is challenging BlackRock and State Street for dominance. It's a battle of titans - and investors are the winners.
By Erika Fry, reporter
FORTUNE -- Vanguard rose to the pinnacle of the mutual fund world with a simple but potent formula: an emphasis on low fees and index funds. These days Vanguard is applying that same philosophy to a fast-growing sector of the investing universe already built around low-cost indexing: MOREJan 29, 2013 5:00 AM ET
The giant asset manager has a new approach that is paying off for buyers and sellers.
FORTUNE – When Zayo Group, a telecom infrastructure provider in Louisville, Colo., needed to raise $1.5 billion this summer after an acquisition, it faced a horrible climate for issuing high-yield bonds. Interest rates on junk had jumped due to the latest turmoil in Europe, making borrowing much more costly.
But Zayo didn't have to pay sky-high MOREKatie Benner - Nov 29, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Larry Fink says fiscal cliff aside, things look good.
FORTUNE -- Could it be morning in America again?
Larry Fink, who is the CEO of Blackrock, one of the world's largest investment firms, says the U.S. economy might be primed for a much stronger recovery than many people predict. Fink says the combination of the rise of the Chinese consumer along with an abundance of cheap natural gas could lead to a MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Oct 26, 2012 2:39 PM ET
AXA Private Equity is on the block. There are several likely suitors.
The big private equity story right now is that insurance giant AXA is shopping its $28 billion private equity unit. AXA Private Equity does a whole lot of everything, including mid-cap LBOs, co-investments, funds-of-funds, secondaries, mezzanine and infrastructure. Some of the money it manages is for AXA, but the majority comes from third-party investors. So this is a bit MOREDan Primack - Sep 29, 2011 10:31 AM ET
If Bank of America's sweeping $8.5 billion settlement is approved, it's a big win for the bank. But a judge still needs to sign off.
By Abigail Field, contributor
FORTUNE -- If Bank of America's $8.5 billion deal to settle nearly all lawsuits claiming Countrywide fundamentally lied to investors about the mortgages it stuffed into securities is approved by a judge, BofA has really won a major victory.
The settlement amount is only MOREJun 29, 2011 1:13 PM ET
|November jobs report: Unemployment falls to 7%|
|Where should you put your money now?|
|Five key numbers behind the jobs recovery|
|2 million Facebook, Gmail and Twitter passwords stolen in massive hack|
|Stocks pop after jobs report|