By Mohamed A. El-Erian
FORTUNE -- Established and highly regarded experts are quite divided on how investors should react to the recent volatility in emerging markets (EM). Some, like the famous EM equity fund manager Mark Mobius, expect the instability to continue and warn investors to be cautious and measured in adding exposure. Others, such as Jim O'Neil, the respected former head of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, believe that such concerns are overdone. They think investors should be exploiting now a huge buying opportunity.
I suspect that this unusually large divide among such experts reflects more than diverse interpretations of the same set of economic, financial, and technical data. It may also point to different underlying frameworks. By analyzing the contextual issues in greater detail, a third approach emerges -- one that recognizes the recurrence of bad old EM behaviors yet suggests a different mix of outcomes and implications.
The heightened volatility in EM assets has been going on for a while now; and it has been quite severe at times. The major selloff was triggered almost a year ago by concerns that the U.S. Federal Reserve would tighten monetary policy ( called "taper"), bruising badly every segment of EM -- both in absolute terms and particularly when compared to what has been happening to other asset classes. Indeed, when you look at the 2013 numbers, it is hard to recall such a large and broad-based dispersion in performance across equities, currencies, sovereign, and corporate bonds.
Three EM-specific factors aggravated the impact of relatively tighter global financial conditions: slowing growth in several emerging economies, concerns about policy incoherence in some of them, and technically vulnerable investor imbalances (particularly between the small group of "dedicated" investors who know the asset class relatively well and can withstand more readily volatility bouts, and "crossover" money susceptible to running out at the first sign of serious dislocations).
It is this mix of drivers that reminds many of the "bad old EM." No wonder contagion (whereby disruptions in weaker EM names contaminate stronger ones despite very different fundamentals) is no longer as a relic of the bad old EM days of the 1980s, 1990s, and early 2000s. It is now more appreciated as a current day reality given the series of highly correlated selloffs, with particularly sharp moves in currencies.
Many were caught offside by the change -- and not only investors who were unable to stomach the heightened volatility but also some companies that have scrambled to deal with their foreign currency exposures.
The next step of this EM dislocation will also seem very familiar to old-timers like me. Specifically, with some countries facing no choice but to hike interest rates and cut fiscal deficits, growth will slow even more, heightening the domestic risk of a negative feedback loop for those countries unable to reformulate promptly their policy mix. In the process, this may fuel preexisting social and political tensions, making it even harder for these governments to act decisively.
I suspect that it is only after this stage plays out that the script will evolve differently, reflecting some notable changes between today's emerging economies as a group and those of yesteryears. Indeed, it is important to recognize the following seven key differences:
Of course, what is true for the asset class as a whole is not true for every country. Some like Argentina and Ukraine are particularly vulnerable as they also incorporate heightened political idiosyncratic risks -- a dimension that will be around for a while given the packed political calendar in several countries. Yet, as an asset class, EM is considerably less prone to the old threats of spreading serial defaults, sustained currency overshoots, and multiple tense IMF negotiations.
Notwithstanding their continued sensitivity to volatility bouts, today's emerging economies constitute much less of a systemic financial threat than they did in the bad old days. Their degree of self-insurance is greater than what it was 10 years ago, and their financial structures are generally more robust. In addition, there has been extensive discussion of EM risks over a period of numerous months, making a systemic surprise event in financial markets less likely.
Having said that, and before we let ourselves slip into complacency, we should remember another important fact: Today's EM are a much bigger part of the global growth equation.
According to IMF data, EM's share in global GDP have increased from 20% to 38% in the last 10 years (and even more in PPP terms). Moreover, this group of countries has contributed almost two-thirds of real global GDP growth in the past 10 years at prevailing exchange rates.
Of course, no single country exemplifies the newfound systemic growth prominence of emerging markets more than China. China is now the world's second-largest economy, accounting for 12% of global GDP -- three times more than a decade ago. Indeed, for this reason alone, both investors and policymakers would be well-served to keep a close eye on China's efforts to control excessive domestic credit growth.
These days, the durable impact on the rest of the world of an EM disruption will operate much more through economic channels and less through financial ones. As such, it will end up being more nuanced. So, contrary to the natural desire to make bold predictions for the asset class as a whole, this is no longer a homogenous asset class. Instead, it is a collective of technically linked but economically quite diverse names; and it is an asset class that warrants a highly differentiated investment approach.
Mohamed A. El-Erian is the outgoing chief executive and co-chief investment officer of Pimco.
Nouriel Roubini, the economist famous for predicting the financial crisis, says it is unlikely wages will pick up in 2014.Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 17, 2014 11:19 AM ET
Santander has fallen woefully short of its chairman's growth targets, and it's not clear things are improving.
FORTUNE -- In early December, Banco Santander spent $650 million to buy an 8% stake in the Bank of Shanghai. For Santander (SAN), Spain's largest bank, the deal looks to be another case of wrong place, wrong time.
It's also the latest example of Santander's hard-charging chairman Emilio Botín's long-running growth strategy. Botín has pursued acquisitions MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 3, 2014 11:38 AM ET
Citigroup stands to lose the most business, but no bank is immune.
FORTUNE -- Here's yet another risk the Federal Reserve might want to consider as it exits its bond buying program: Could the growing rout in emerging markets create a financial crisis back home?
Rising interest rates in the U.S., sparked by indications that the Fed may slow its bond buying, have translated into a summer of pain for emerging markets. MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Sep 3, 2013 5:00 AM ET
A top strategist at Morgan Stanley sees more bearish times for BRICs and a little bit of hope in Europe.
FORTUNE -- In recent weeks, emerging markets, long seen as the darlings of the global economy, have tumbled. Cash is flowing out, pushing down the values of stocks, bonds, and currencies in India, Indonesia, and elsewhere. Brazil's problems have been well documented and are boiling over. China's long guaranteed growth MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Aug 22, 2013 9:00 AM ET
For all the criticisms the Fed faced over its large-scale bond purchasing program, some emerging economies now can't see life without QE.
FORTUNE -- Not long ago, leaders of emerging economies thought the U.S. Federal Reserve's easy money policies aimed at nursing the American economy back to health might also destroy the rest of the world. But as the U.S. economy slowly improves, some countries now worry that the Fed's stimulus MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Jul 17, 2013 11:17 AM ET
In times of turmoil, gold is considered a safe haven. So why is it still crashing now?
By Moshe Silver, Hedgeye
FORTUNE -- Gold is down more than 25% from its recent highs, leading some observers to declare it on track for its biggest one-quarter decline since the Bretton Woods system collapsed in 1971.
This is a bit misleading: the average price of gold in 1971 was around $40 an ounce. The following year MOREJul 8, 2013 2:38 PM ET
Growth rates in India and the other large emerging economies are unlikely to stage a comeback this decade, argues a new book by Morgan Stanley's emerging markets equity head.Feb 12, 2013 10:18 AM ET
Inflation is on the rise in many parts of the world, but there are ways to profit from it through key trades in commodities, currencies and global equities.
By Darius Dale, Hedgeye
In recent weeks and months, analysts at Goldman Sachs (GS) and JPMorgan (JPM) have been reneging on their bullish emerging markets as a result of hawkish monetary policy and instead are predicting outperformance by US MOREJan 18, 2011 5:00 AM ET
The Fed's quantitative easing will likely lead to rising inflation in these three important countries. With food prices already skyrocketing, how well will their central bankers tame the beast?
by Darius Dale, Hedgeye
Chairman Bernanke's experiment with quantitative easing continues to have unintended consequences for the global economy, due to the impact of the equation highlighted below:
QE2 = inflation [globally] = monetary policy tightening [globally] = slower growth [globally]
A brief review of global MOREJan 5, 2011 11:47 AM ET
|GM's $1.3 billion recall cost wipes out profit|
|Will 7 Apples a day keep the bears away? - The Buzz|
|Taxpayers are subsidizing CEO pay - The Buzz|
|Regulators pave way for Internet "fast lane" with net neutrality rules|
|Postal workers to protest at Staples|