FORTUNE -- For tech stocks, growth may no longer be coming at a reasonable price, even after the recent pull-back.
Technology stocks are down 6% since they peaked in early March. And that drop is larger than the dip in the general market during the same time period.
But that doesn't mean there are bargains to be had. The average stock in the Nasdaq 100 (NDX) has a price-to-earnings multiple of 18, based on projected 2014 bottom lines. That compares to 16 for the S&P 500 (SPX). And that's with the dip.
Technology stock believers say it's unfair to compare the P/E ratios of the average large company to tech stocks. Technology companies tend to increase in earnings at a faster rate, so they deserve higher P/E ratios.
It would be more fair to compare technology stocks to themselves. Back in early 2001, the Nasdaq 100 had a P/E of 60, according to FactSet. So today's 18 looks cheap.
Here's the problem: Technology companies, while still growing faster than the rest of the economy, are not increasing their earnings nearly as fast as they once were. That's particularly true for the large technology companies that make up the majority of the market cap of the Nasdaq 100.
Microsoft (MSFT), for instance, is only expected to increase its earnings 3.4% this year. Income at Oracle (ORCL) is projected to rise 1.3%. Even with Apple (AAPL), analysts are only looking for a 2.8% bottom-line jump.
Back in 2001, analysts were predicting that the companies that then made up the the Nasdaq 100 would boost their bottom lines by 34% over the following year. These days, analysts are projecting a more modest 10% growth in earnings among Nasdaq's 100 largest companies.
Another way to look at this is a ratio some call the GARP multiple, which was reportedly a favorite metric of mutual fund giant Peter Lynch. The name stands for Growth at a Reasonable Price, and the ratio compares a stock's, or the market's, P/E multiple to earnings growth. Back in 2001, the Nasdaq 100 had a GARP ratio of around 1.8. Today's GARP multiple: 1.8.
Investors who bought into technology stocks in early 2001 thinking they were getting a bargain didn't get one. The Nasdaq 100 fell another 33% that year. Today's technology investors could be similarly disappointed.
The social network is growing through acquisitions. But investors may want to take a second look at how they are valuing that growth.
By Lauren Silva Laughlin
FORTUNE -- Is Facebook overvalued? The social network's shareholders have fared well since the company went public in mid-2012. Shares are up more than 80% since its IPO and have climbed steadily over the last six months. But investors have paused since Mark Zuckerberg, MOREMar 5, 2014 5:00 AM ET
Target-date funds did well in 2013 for all the wrong reasons.Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Feb 18, 2014 5:00 AM ET
It is understandable that some are comparing recent emerging markets troubles to the Asian financial crisis of 1997. But while it isn't the best time for emerging markets, it is hardly the end of days.Jan 28, 2014 12:16 PM ET
Why the market jolt last week was the start of a sobering reality check for tech stocks.
FORTUNE -- Market prognosticators have conjured up many a reason for the two-day rout of stocks on Thursday and Friday, which sent the Dow Jones Industrial Average (INDU) plunging 494 points (3%) and the S&P 500 (SPX) down 55 points (3%). Some blamed the slowdown in China's perpetual manufacturing machine; others, the fears of MOREShawn Tully, senior editor-at-large - Jan 27, 2014 5:00 AM ET
Facebook is clearly tipping its hand today, saying that its stock is overvalued and the company isn't going to perform as well as the market believes it will.
By Cyrus Sanati
FORTUNE -- Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Facebook, will sell 41.4 million shares worth of stock in the company, worth $2.3 billion, to pay a tax bill, the company said. He apparently incurred the tax liability when he exercised the option MOREDec 19, 2013 3:00 PM ET
The stock and bond markets have been moving in the same direction lately, and that has some worried.Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Dec 9, 2013 12:28 PM ET
Over the past 10 years or so, trading has become dizzyingly complex and frenetic. So how have investors fared? Surprisingly well.
By Lauren Silva Laughlin; graphics Nicolas Rapp
FORTUNE -- Once upon a time, an ordinary investor -- call him Joe -- would take some of his retirement savings and put it into a giant brand-name mutual fund that advertised in the Sunday paper. The fund would take that money and MOREDec 5, 2013 6:52 AM ET
The largest IPOs of 2013 may not be as sexy as offerings from the latest tech darlings, but they contributed to the biggest year of public offerings since the tech bubble of the early 2000s.Nin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Dec 3, 2013 11:05 AM ET
The market isn't reacting to certain economic news as we might expect, but that doesn't mean it isn't rational.
By Mohamed A. El-Erian
FORTUNE -- So, good news was interpreted as bad news by the markets on Thursday while, on the very next day, good news was indeed good news? Are markets really that fickle? Are convictions really that shallow?
It is tempting to respond yes based on the view that, over MORENov 11, 2013 9:02 AM ET
|GM's recalled Cobalt was a failure from the start|
|Your Internet security relies on a few volunteers|
|Americans have fallen in love with real estate once again|
|Why you should pay off your car loan ASAP|
|Lara Spencer promoted to 'Good Morning America' co-host|