FORTUNE -- Rep. Dave Camp (R-MI), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, yesterday proposed a sweeping personal and business tax overhaul that includes (you guessed it) a change to how carried interest is treated. This would apply to virtually all limited partnerships engaged in anything besides real estate (sorry venture capitalists – your recent contribution to Rep. Camp's reelection campaign is non-refundable). The bill also includes a revival of the so-called enterprise tax, which would treat publicly-traded private equity firms like corporations.
To be clear, this specific legislation is not going to become law. Or even voted upon in its current form. But it is worth discussing, given that Camp is the top House Republican on taxes and appears willing to sacrifice one of his party's sacred cows.
For starters, the exact amount that private equity and venture capital firms would be taxed on carried interest under the Camp bill is a bit hard to follow. Seriously, this section is the legislative version of Kurt Cobain singing lyrics written by James Joyce. Overall, the top ordinary income rate would be lowered to 35% (25% plus a 10% surcharge for individuals making over $400k per year), and carried interest would ultimately end up closer to 35% than to the bill's effective long-term capital gains rate of 24.8% (current long-term effective rate is around 25%, including both the 20% cap gains rate and some other kickers).
Camp could have simply reclassified carried interest as ordinary income, given that he has stressed that "simplifying the tax code" is a major impetus for his work. But perhaps he wanted to keep at least a few accountants employed, so the effective tax rate calculation includes such variables as carry-over taxes from past years, the amount of capital contributed by fund partners and federal long-term interest rates. What you end up with is basically a blended rate where the effective tax rate tends to decrease as return-on-investment rises.
What's more important, however, is that I think Camp is seriously underestimating the amount of extra federal revenue that would come from his bill, assuming the 35% rate. He cites a $3.1 billion figure, from the Joint Committee on Taxation. But I think it is much, much higher.
PitchBook ran some detailed calculations for me for the decade of private equity and venture capital returns between 2003 and 2012. It used a combination of fundraising and fund performance statistics to estimate around $399 billion in realized returns for U.S.-based VC/PE funds. Let's assume an 8% hurdle rate for the entire lot, even though few VC funds actually feature such a provision. Then let's assume an average carried interest of 21% (I went a bit higher than the standard 20%, because larger funds often have higher carry). That would mean that VC/PE firms took home around $77 billion in carried interest during the period.
In this case, the difference between the current long-term effective tax rate of 25% and the approximate Camp-proposed 35% rate would be around $7.7 billion. Or, put another way, more than two times the JCT projection. Moreover, these calculations do not include a dollar of increased tax revenue from hedge funds, oil/gas funds or timber funds. And the particular time period detailed happened to include the worst financial crisis of our lifetime (i.e., the next 10 years are likely to produce better returns).
Again, the specifics here are bound to change as other legislators get their hands on Camp's proposal. But almost any chance to carried interest tax treatment would result in much more federal tax revenue than is currently being projected.
Sign up for Dan Primack's daily email newsletter on deals and deal-makers: GetTermSheet.com
Congress wants to squeeze more tax revenue out of Twitter, but it's looking in the wrong place.
FORTUNE -- As Wall Street toasted Twitter this week, a very different view toward the company took hold in Washington, D.C., where Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Carl Levin (D-MI) accused Twitter of exploiting a massive tax loophole. Specifically, they wrote:
"When Twitter goes public later this week, the company may avail itself of this existing MOREDan Primack - Nov 7, 2013 5:06 PM ET
'Carried interest' is back on the table and so are the private equity industry's defenders.
FORTUNE -- President Obama today unveiled his federal budget proposal, which included a change to how private equity fund managers are taxed on investment profits (i.e., carried interest). Basically, it would tax carried interest as ordinary income, rather than at the lower capital gains rate. And, to be clear, this only relates to gains where the MOREDan Primack - Apr 10, 2013 4:58 PM ET
The carried interest tax debate isn't about deficit reduction.
FORTUNE -- Steve Judge, president of the Private Equity Growth Capital Council, today wrote an op-ed arguing that carried interest should continue to be treated by the IRS as a capital gain. Nothing particularly new in his fundamental argument, so it's not worth relitigating my disagreement.
But Judge did add one wrinkle that should be noted (and then disabused). From his piece:
"Changing the tax MOREDan Primack - Mar 4, 2013 4:25 PM ET
Democrats still have some revenue-raising options after their fiscal cliff win.
FORTUNE -- Democrats apparently are worried that they won't have any leverage in upcoming debt ceiling and sequestration debates, after succeeding last night in raising taxes on America's top earners. It's a bit like a Super Bowl-winning team fretting over its free agents before even having the parade. So here's a bright spot for those on the left who refuse MOREDan Primack - Jan 2, 2013 2:49 PM ET
Has the carried interest tax debate expanded?
While in Chapel Hill this past weekend, I caught a "state of the VC market" talk by National Venture Capital Association president Mark Heesen. During a section on regulation, Heesen raised the issue of carried interest taxation – but then spent several minutes on the topic without again referencing the term "carried interest." Instead, he spoke about how a move is afoot on Capitol MOREDan Primack - Apr 17, 2012 1:45 PM ET
Mitt Romney keeps refusing to answer a simple question.
As a private equity investor, Mitt Romney earned millions in additional income through the tax treatment of carried interest as capital gains rather than as ordinary income. As a presidential candidate in 2007, Romney said that he believed that carried interest should continue to be treated as a capital gains. As a presidential candidate in 2012, however, Romney tap-dances around the issue MOREDan Primack - Mar 7, 2012 11:31 AM ET
Venture capitalist Marc Andreessen believes that carried interest should be treated as ordinary income, according to comments made this morning on CNBC's Squqak Box. He is the latest in a small, but growing number of influential VCs who agree with President Obama that they are paying too little tax on investment profits derived from third-party capital:
"My personal view is carried interest should be treated as ordinary income. It's a fee for service. MOREDan Primack - Mar 2, 2012 9:13 AM ET
Obama again goes after the loophole that will not close.
President Obama today released his $3.8 trillion budget proposal for fiscal year 2013, and once again he is proposing to change the tax treatment of carried interest from capital gains to ordinary income.
Here is the section (pg. 40):
Tax Carried (Profits) Interests as Ordinary Income. Currently, many hedge fund managers, private equity partners, and other managers in partnerships are able to pay MOREDan Primack - Feb 13, 2012 11:47 AM ET
Investment managers have held on to it for years, but 'carried interest' carries an odious loophole that needs to go.
FORTUNE -- Politics has moments when it's actually useful. Case in point is the uproar over Mitt Romney's tax returns, which may help rid us of a small but noxious and symbolic loophole worth several billion dollars a year to managers of investment partnerships.
I'm talking about "carried interest" -- finance-speak for MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Feb 8, 2012 5:00 AM ET
|5 people you might not tip (but should)|
|General Mills reverses course on right to sue after backlash|
|Pope Francis challenges the free market - The Buzz|
|Stocks: It's report card time on Wall Street|
|Americans have fallen in love with real estate once again|