By Steven Clifford
FORTUNE – As part of an effort to revamp America's complex tax code, U.S. Congressman Dave Camp last week proposed to curb CEO pay by tightening a tax giveaway created in the 1990s. Perhaps unexpected for a Republican, Camp's plan would raise $12.1 billion in taxes over 10 years by prohibiting U.S. companies from taking income-tax deductions for their top executives' pay exceeding $1 million, even if it's based on performance.
Currently, laws exempt performance-based pay from the $1 million limit. The problem with that is it has encouraged companies to raise base salaries to that level and reward executives with options.
Camp's proposal is a welcome move to help tame the ballooning CEO pay we've seen over the years. CEO pay began to escalate in the early 1980s, but salaries took off in big ways after the passage of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) in 1993, which allowed unlimited deducibility of executive pay based on performance; at the time, President Bill Clinton signed it into law and it has been one of his greatest follies. In 2000, CEO pay was 383 times that of the average worker, compared with 123 times in 1995, according to a June 2012 study by the Economic Policy Institute.
During his 1992 presidential campaign, Clinton had promised to end unlimited tax deductibility for executives earning more than $1 million. He later softened his stance and capped deductibility at $1 million except for "performance pay." Once CEOs, compensation consultants, board directors and corporate lawyers caught on to the new law, they realized CEOs could be paid unlimited amounts so long as they could pass it off as "performance based."
One immediate consequence of OBRA was that many companies were forced to replace bonuses paid at the discretion of the board – subjective bonuses – with bonuses determined by rigid formulas. That's because, under IRS regulations, plugging objective data into a formula would qualify as "performance pay" no matter how absurd the result, but a discretionary bonus based on the board's after-the-fact subjective judgment will not. The mandate of blind objectivity proved far more remunerative for CEOs than discretionary bonuses had been.
By restricting salary and requiring performance pay, the government inaugurated the mega-bonus era of the mid-1990s. Although long-term bonuses had been awarded to some executives as early as the 1940s, bonuses were not common enough to make a noticeable impact on median compensation until the late1950s. Between 1950 and 1970 bonuses ranged between 15% and 20% of current compensation, with no obvious trend. Today, the proportions are reversed. Salary is typically a small portion of CEO compensation, normally only 10% to 20% at larger companies.
Stock option awards almost always qualify as performance pay. Mega option awards and a booming stock market fueled the exponential growth in CEO pay between 1995 and 2000. In a 2011 paper, Kevin Murphy, professor of finance and business economics at the University of Southern California, wrote, "The explosion in stock options that led to the escalation in pay was in large part the (arguably unintended) consequence from government policy." So let's hope Congressman Camp's proposal gains momentum.
Steven Clifford is retired CEO of King Broadcasting Company and has served on over a dozen private and public company boards.
Clearly, it's not a smart PR move. But going by a number of other methods JPMorgan is underpaying its CEO.Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 24, 2014 2:28 PM ET
James Gorman gets the lowest pay of the 2012 Wall Street CEO packages revealed so far, making less than a third of what Goldman's Lloyd Blankfein makes.
FORTUNE - Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman is now a $6 million man. On Wall Street, that size check ain't considered bionic.
According to people familiar with the firm's plans, Morgan Stanley's board decided to cut Gorman's total compensation for 2012 by 30% from the MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 24, 2013 5:50 PM ET
Pay is down at Goldman Sachs, but Blankfein still gets $5 million in cash for 2011.
FORTUNE - It's still good to be the king on Wall Street, just less so.
On Friday, Goldman Sachs (GS) said it paid its top five executives 35% less than it did a year ago. The company cut CEO Lloyd Blankfein's pay to $12 million for 2011 from $18 million a year ago.
That knocks Blankfein considerably MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Apr 13, 2012 10:02 AM ET
JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon says 2011 was a good year, but that "contrived" banking regulations are slowing the U.S.'s economic recovery.
FORTUNE -- Jamie Dimon is still Wall Street's top dog.
JPMorgan Chase (JPM) disclosed on Wednesday afternoon that it paid its CEO $23 million in 2011. That was the same as last year, but it handily made Dimon, for the second year in a row, the best paid CEO in banking in MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Apr 4, 2012 6:30 PM ET
Who says there isn't money to be made in traditional banking?
FORTUNE -- Wells Fargo (WFC) said in a filing on Thursday that it paid its CEO John Stumpf nearly $17.9 million in 2011. That was up $800,000 from the year before, and it was more than Citigroup (C) paid its CEO Vikram Pandit, who got $14.9 million in 2011. The other banks have yet to officially announce their executive compensation. MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Mar 15, 2012 5:09 PM ET
Four more years! Four more years!
That's what Citigroup's (C) board was inexplicably chanting this week as it signed up for another term under Vikram Pandit, the CEO whose signal accomplishments include repaying a giant government bailout and executing a reverse stock split that rescued Citi from penny stock purgatory.
That's not much of a record, but Citi is grateful anyway. It signed Pandit to a deal that will hand him more than $20 MOREColin Barr - May 19, 2011 10:19 AM ET
Let's say you're a giant bank with an extra 400 grand lying around. What to do with it?
You could pay six workers the median family income in your home state of New York, perhaps. Or you could pick up the moving expenses for your CEO, who made $20.8 million last year and $58 million over the past three – not counting the $2 million he just cleared on the sale MOREColin Barr - Apr 8, 2011 12:10 PM ET
Give Transocean this: It never runs out of ways to make itself look shabby.
The Swiss-based oil driller tried to clean up a major public relations mess, announcing Tuesday that its five top execs will give back a fraction of the bonuses they undeservingly received for last year. Transocean (RIG) put the fool in April Fool's Day last week by awarding the five $898,282 in bonuses in recognition of the "best year in safety MOREColin Barr - Apr 6, 2011 5:49 AM ET
Goldman Sachs didn't have its best year, but CEO Lloyd Blankfein still managed to walk away with $18.6 million.
Blankfein and each of his top four lieutenants made that sum last year, Goldman (GS) said in its annual proxy statement filed Friday afternoon. Each man received $600,000 in salary, a $5.4 million cash bonus and $12.6 million in restricted stock that can't be sold immediately.
That compares with $9.6 million in salary MOREColin Barr - Apr 1, 2011 5:14 PM ET
|GM's recalled Cobalt was a failure from the start|
|Pope Francis challenges the free market - The Buzz|
|Why you should pay off your car loan ASAP|
|Americans have fallen in love with real estate once again|
|Detroit pension cuts hit civilian workers hardest|