FORTUNE -- At first glance, you would think that the CEOs of taxophobic U.S. corporations and our less-than-stellar leaders in Washington have nothing in common. But you'd be wrong. What they share is a lack of shame and an excess of narrow thinking.
The similarity between C-suite tax avoiders and Washington reality avoiders struck me as I watched the debt-ceiling and government-shutdown debacle unfold. Listening to politicians say "This is what voters in my district want" reminded me of watching Apple (AAPL) chief executive Tim Cook invoke "shareholder value" during his May testimony at a Senate hearing that focused on the extraordinary games that Apple plays to avoid paying U.S. taxes on what anyone other than a tax lawyer would consider U.S. income. Not only was Cook not visibly embarrassed, but he actually seemed proud of what the company was doing.
Pols and CEOs both justify their actions by citing obligations to their narrow constituencies. The fact that all Americans, conservative and liberal alike, would realize long-term benefits from having a functional government with predictable finances? The fact that shareholders would ultimately realize serious value from an increase in our nation's well-being if bigtime corporate tax avoiders decided they had an obligation to help pay for public education and infrastructure? Well, that's when people trot out the John Maynard Keynes line, "In the long run, we are all dead."
Look, it's easy to understand why companies (perfectly legally) avoid taxes. Lower taxes mean higher profits, which presumably translate into higher stock prices. However, going to extraordinary lengths to avoid taxes helps undermine companies' long-term interests by hurting society and by giving average people yet another reason to detest Big Business.
It's also easy to understand why politicians would rather pander to their constituents than act in the national interest. It's safer. If you're a Tea Party type who compromises or a liberal who tells Social Security recipients that the program in its current form is unsustainable, you risk losing your job.
I have a belief, possibly naive, that when you're entrusted with corporate or political leadership, you're supposed to lead rather than stick your finger in the air, divine the prevailing wind, and follow it. But maybe that's just me.
However, I actually see a few glimmers of hope. Some of the fanatics who caused the government shutdown and fomented the debt-ceiling crisis are catching heat for having damaged conservatives' long-term interests. Which, in fact, they did. And I've even seen a company do the right thing because it was embarrassed. Not in the U.S., but in England, where an uproar erupted last year after a superb series by Reuters (see bottom of page) about the tax-avoidance games played by Starbucks (SBUX), which, Reuters reported, told shareholders it was making big profits in England but filed U.K. tax returns showing losses. My favorite part was Starbucks U.K. buying coffee beans from a Swiss affiliate that benefited from an agricultural tax break.
As a result of the blowback, Starbucks paid £10 million (about $16 million) of U.K. taxes voluntarily. Hello? What's going on? I asked Starbucks why it was voluntarily paying taxes. The answer, from Corey duBrowa, Starbucks' senior vice president for global communications: "We believe that acting responsibly makes good business sense, and the payment of corporate tax in the U.K. is a good example of this ethos in action."
Alas, two other U.S. companies harpooned by Reuters -- Google (GOOG) and Amazon (AMZN) -- felt no obligation to do anything. But Starbucks' deciding that it's good business to pay taxes is really encouraging. So is the intra-conservative debate between pragmatists and fanatics. Liberals may be next. If we get lucky, shame and political compromise may yet become trendy.
Reuters' 2012 special report
How Starbucks avoids UK taxes
Amazon's billion-dollar tax shield
Starbucks's European tax bill disappears down $100 million hole
How the UK tax authority got cozy with big business
EBay's double tax base prompts calls for investigation
Reuters' coverage of Google's tax strategy this year
This story is from the November 18, 2013 issue of Fortune.
Oracle, Google, and Amazon are just a few of the hundreds of large companies that have cut confidential deals with the IRS to help lower their tax bills, and critics want the agency to disclose the details of these complex pacts.
By Lynnley Browning
FORTUNE -- When Oracle reported its latest quarterly earnings last month, most investors focused on the fact that its dividend doubled. The number that got less notice MOREJul 22, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Tax writers have announced a "blank slate" approach to the tax code overhaul.
By Tory Newmyer, writer
FORTUNE -- Corporate tax lobbyists should cancel any vacations they planned to take next month. That's the upshot of a letter the Senate's two leading tax writers sent their colleagues today to put them on notice that their overhaul of the code is starting from scratch. In other words, every corporate carve-out -- for MOREJun 27, 2013 12:52 PM ET
More energy companies are converting to a tax-free status that was once reserved for a small segment of the industry.
FORTUNE -- More and more of the companies benefiting from new technologies that are fueling America's recent energy boom are paying little or no taxes.
In early May, Emerge Energy Services sold $127 million in shares in an initial public offering. Emerge (EMES) supplies sand to oil and gas drillers for blasting MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - May 28, 2013 9:19 AM ET
Tax avoidance works beautifully -- and legally -- for Apple and other multinationals. Why not make it work for you?
FORTUNE -- It's faddish -- and fun -- these days to talk about the income taxes that Apple does or doesn't pay. Hey, as we learned this week from a Senate report and hearings, Apple's tax strategems are even slicker than its products are. Many of them involve the "intellectual property" MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - May 23, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Businesses organized as partnerships account for 35% of all sales. So why are we taxing them at higher rates than other corporations?
By Stephen Chipman and Doreen Griffith
FORTUNE -- The top concern for certain business entities seeking to compete on a level playing field through tax reform has not yet been addressed.
Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp has released a tax reform discussion draft that would simplify the tax rules for MOREMay 14, 2013 12:44 PM ET
A lower corporate tax rate won't deter companies from playing tax and accounting games. Just look at Apple's math.
FORTUNE -- There's a widely shared idea that if the U.S. reduced its corporate income tax rate to 25% from the current 35%, big corporations would stop playing tax games. They would then pour all their attention into profit-making rather than allocating a ton of talent to tax avoidance, and we would MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Apr 26, 2013 5:00 AM ET
As Democratic Senator Max Baucus plans to step down, his party's leaders want to push him to meet them in the middle on corporate tax reform.
By Tory Newmyer, writer
FORTUNE -- With the news Tuesday that Senator Max Baucus, chairman of the tax-writing Finance Committee, will not seek a seventh term in 2014, prospects for a comprehensive overhaul of the corporate tax code appeared to brighten. In this case, appearances are MOREApr 23, 2013 1:38 PM ET
The President, key conservatives, and even some of the nation's biggest corporations are leaning toward trading special breaks for lower rates.
By Nina Easton, senior editor-at-large
FORTUNE -- The economy coughs and sputters and threatens to stall out -- again. Growth slows; unemployment ticks back up to 8.3%. Congress shamelessly convenes a five-week recess, while the President camps out under the comforting applause of the campaign trail.
The absurdity of Washington's inaction MOREAug 29, 2012 5:00 AM ET
It's easy to point the finger at a Democratic president who wants to reform the corporate tax code, but the real enemy is a lot closer to home.
FORTUNE -- Many private equity investors are convinced that President Obama is their enemy, not only because he wants to defeat former Bain Capital boss Mitt Romney in November, but also because of a new corporate tax reform proposal that could make private MOREDan Primack - Mar 28, 2012 5:00 AM ET
|Five things you didn't know about Bernie Madoff's epic scam|
|Obamacare: 365,000 have signed up for insurance on exchanges|
|Teen millionaire helping Yahoo become cool again|
|What the budget deal doesn't do|
|1.3 million set to lose jobless benefits|