FORTUNE -- Happy Tax Season! In honor of our annual spring ritual, let me show you how utterly bizarre the American tax system can be, using a recent deal between two well-known outfits to illustrate my point. The deal involves Don Graham's Graham Holdings (GHC) (formerly the Washington Post Co.) and Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA), which are doing what's known in the tax biz as a cash-rich split-off. It's a way that companies can dispose of holdings on which they have big gains and emerge with cash without technically selling anything, thus incurring no tax bill. Doesn't that sound like fun?
Why am I amused by this, rather than enraged, the way I am by companies like Apple (AAPL), which call themselves American but invent repellent (albeit not illegal) ways to artificially suck earnings out of the U.S. via offshore subsidiaries that don't have to pay any tax anywhere? Because cash-rich split-offs are specifically allowed by the Internal Revenue Code. Graham and Berkshire aren't pushing boundaries; they're using something that Congress has specifically allowed. It's absurd, but it's permissible under the tax code provisions that govern corporate spinoffs, such as the imminent non-game-playing separation of my employer, Time Inc., from Time Warner (TWX).
Graham and Berkshire, which both declined to talk to me, stand to save a total of about $675 million in federal and state income taxes by going the cash-rich split-off route. Graham is trading cash, Berkshire stock that it owns, and a TV station for most of Berkshire's 23% stake in Graham. (Disclosure alert: I own shares in both companies, and am a pensioner of Graham.)
Cash-rich split-offs have become increasingly popular since 2003, when the Janus mutual fund management company did the first one, with DST Systems (DST), a data-processing company in which it owned a big stake. Letting companies split into separate parts, tax-free, is a long-standing, rational practice. But now some spinoffs have become tax-avoidance vehicles, in which a business is included merely to make the deal tax-free. For example, in 2006, Time Warner traded cash plus the Atlanta Braves baseball team to famously taxophobic Liberty Media (LMCA) for Time Warner stock that Liberty owned. The deal was tax-free for both firms.
Here's how a cash-rich split-off works. Company A puts cash or other "investment assets" plus a business into a subsidiary that it then swaps tax-free to Company B in return for B's holding of A's stock. Graham is ponying up $400,282,183 worth of Berkshire stock that it owns, plus $327,717,817 in cash, for a total of $728 million. It's also tossing in WPLG, a Miami TV station that the deal values at $364 million -- exactly one-third of the $1.092 billion that Graham will give Berkshire. (You'll see in a bit why I'm being so precise.)
In return, Graham will get 1,625,747 Graham shares that Berkshire owns. As of March 7, the date Berkshire used in an SEC filing, that stock was worth about $1.144 billion.
Had Berkshire sold those Graham shares, which cost it about $10 million 40 years ago, for $1.092 billion, it would owe about $425 million in federal and state capital gains taxes. Had Graham sold the Berkshire stock (estimated cost: $130 million) for $400 million, and the TV station (purchased in 1969 for around $15 million) for $364 million, it would owe about $250 million in taxes. Call the total tax savings $675 million. Plus Graham receives a bonus typical of deals like this and gets back shares worth about $50 million more than the assets it's shelling out.
Tax expert Bob Willens of Robert Willens LLC says that Berkshire had best get Graham to reduce its cash payment by $1 when the deal closes. That's because the tax code says the operating business has to be "somewhat more than a third" of the total price, not the exact third indicated in the Berkshire filing. Willens, with a chuckle, says he won't bill anyone for the advice. And that will do it. Many happy returns to you and yours.
Reporter associate: Marty Jones
This story is from the April 28, 2014 issue of Fortune.
Why tax experts believe Rep. Dave Camp's proposal is misguided. (And, no, this article isn't totally self-serving.)
FORTUNE -- On April 2, Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, released his eagerly awaited vision of tax reform, a draft bill 979 pages in length that's taken three years to prepare. Camp's stated goal is to make today's fiendishly complex tax code simpler and fairer. But one MOREShawn Tully, senior editor-at-large - Apr 4, 2014 5:00 AM ET
As governments coordinate to fix international tax laws on overseas earnings, companies may have to pay more taxes.
By Jack T. Ciesielski
FORTUNE -- Costless stock options. Lending to subprime borrowers. The irrelevance of earnings and cash flow for Internet companies because they can always tap capital markets. Those are some of the good ideas gone bad on Wall Street, all seemingly foolproof at first. Costless stock options warped earnings and MOREMar 31, 2014 1:14 PM ET
A longtime critic of corporate tax loopholes concedes that JPMorgan and Twitter are not tax dodgers.
FORTUNE -- The odd couple of JPMorgan Chase and Twitter made news Thursday when the bank canceled a planned session on Twitter featuring vice chairman Jimmy Lee, because it attracted a ton of hostile tweets, such as, "When [JPM CEO] Jamie Dimon eats babies are they served rare?"
The bank and the social media company are MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Nov 15, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Corporate America needs to step up and pay its fair share, instead of using shareholder value as an excuse to dodge taxes.
FORTUNE -- At first glance, you would think that the CEOs of taxophobic U.S. corporations and our less-than-stellar leaders in Washington have nothing in common. But you'd be wrong. What they share is a lack of shame and an excess of narrow thinking.
The similarity between C-suite tax avoiders and MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Oct 30, 2013 5:00 AM ET
The next big private equity buyout will likely involve an offshore affiliate, a flurry of money exchanges, a lower tax bill, and higher returns. But the IRS is knocking.
By Lynnley Browning
FORTUNE -- Private equity firms, buffeted by challenges to long-held tax breaks and growing scrutiny from regulators, have an ugly new headache: a wary look by the Internal Revenue Service at one of their preferred acquisition techniques.
The technique involves MOREAug 21, 2013 8:59 AM ET
Oracle, Google, and Amazon are just a few of the hundreds of large companies that have cut confidential deals with the IRS to help lower their tax bills, and critics want the agency to disclose the details of these complex pacts.
By Lynnley Browning
FORTUNE -- When Oracle reported its latest quarterly earnings last month, most investors focused on the fact that its dividend doubled. The number that got less notice MOREJul 22, 2013 5:00 AM ET
More energy companies are converting to a tax-free status that was once reserved for a small segment of the industry.
FORTUNE -- More and more of the companies benefiting from new technologies that are fueling America's recent energy boom are paying little or no taxes.
In early May, Emerge Energy Services sold $127 million in shares in an initial public offering. Emerge (EMES) supplies sand to oil and gas drillers for blasting MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - May 28, 2013 9:19 AM ET
A lower corporate tax rate won't deter companies from playing tax and accounting games. Just look at Apple's math.
FORTUNE -- There's a widely shared idea that if the U.S. reduced its corporate income tax rate to 25% from the current 35%, big corporations would stop playing tax games. They would then pour all their attention into profit-making rather than allocating a ton of talent to tax avoidance, and we would MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Apr 26, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Studies suggest that lower tax rates won't boost corporate investment or the economy.
On Wednesday, when Obama announced his plan to revise the corporate tax code and lower the top rate companies pay, he cited the fact that in many other developed nations corporations pay less. It's a familiar point. Republicans make it all the time. The buzz word is competitiveness. And people on both sides of the political isle seem MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Feb 23, 2012 10:31 AM ET
|GM's recalled Cobalt was a failure from the start|
|Michaels hack hit 3 million|
|Ousted Yahoo exec gets $58 million golden parachute|
|Detroit pension cuts hit civilian workers hardest|
|Canadians arrest a Heartbleed hacker|