FORTUNE -- Almost a century ago Thomas Marshall, Woodrow Wilson's Vice President, got tired of listening to senators blather on about the nation's needs and uttered the words that made him immortal: "What this country needs is a good five-cent cigar." Today, with 24/7 blathering as our national political pastime, let me adapt Marshall's 1917 remark: What this country needs to get its act together is a good five-alarm financial crisis.
I mean, look around. Except for the Federal Reserve, which has consistently tried to help the economy, misguided though some of its actions may be, about the only real changes our government has made since the onset of the financial crisis were induced by fear. The Troubled Asset Relief Program, which played a vital role in restoring confidence and stability to the financial system, was passed only because the House's rejection of it on Sept. 28, 2008, set off a 778-point plummet in the Dow. That scared the House into reversing itself.
The only parts of the budget sequester -- an exercise in economic idiocy -- that have been modified are the FAA's cutbacks that caused air-travel delays bad enough to scare politicians into action and the food inspectors who were rescued after the meat and poultry industry spoke out in support of them. The sequester, remember, was a doomsday device created to resolve the debt-ceiling crisis in 2011, on the assumption that sequestration was so stupid and damaging that people would do anything to keep it at bay. Yet here it is.
Now, for the third time in two years, we're dealing with a debt-ceiling drama. The previous two times Republicans played this game -- the summer of 2011 and year-end 2012 -- they damaged the country's financial credibility for no discernible gain to themselves. Why they think the third time will be the charm is beyond me. I blame the Republicans (my former party) more than I blame the Democrats (my previous former party) for our national gridlock. But the Democrats are no prizes either.
Take the budget deficit, which is shrinking rapidly. Many Democrats are declaring victory, saying that everything is heading in the right direction; there's no need to cut the growth of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid; it's all under control. But if you read the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's recent analysis, you see that everything is far from fine for the long term.
Part of the deficit decline comes from the higher tax rates that went into effect this year, and part from the economy's growth. But a good part of the shrinkage is from one-time items that will disappear, such as an increase in this year's income-tax collections because companies accelerated some 2013 dividends and bonuses into last year so recipients could avoid the Jan. 1 tax increases. Another factor is the lower-than-previously-projected interest rates on the national debt. But they won't last indefinitely, because the Fed has already begun warning markets of future rate increases.
I had expected our leaders to have rational conversations after the poisonous 2012 elections were over. I was naive. The Democrats, scenting blood, pretended to reach out to Republicans, but really didn't. Now, smelling blood over Benghazi, the IRS, and media phone records, Republicans aren't even pretending to be playing nice.
Calm down, you say. Stocks are at all-time highs, house prices have recovered, and corporate profits are strong. What could possibly cause a crisis?
For starters, we still have too-big-to-fail banks that depend on short-term financial markets, which could dry up in an instant, as in 2008-09. Some, including my Fortune colleague Sheila Bair, think the government now has the tools to deal with this. I respectfully disagree.
The debt-ceiling question, supposedly on hold until September, has disaster potential too. If we slip over the brink this time, it could spook foreign buyers, run interest rates way up, run stocks down, and spark a financial panic.
I don't want to see a crisis, and I hope our alleged leaders, who aren't stupid, bestir themselves before one strikes. But I sure wouldn't count on it. Too bad for them. Too bad for us.
This story is from the June 10, 2013 issue of Fortune.
The billionaire founder of Oaktree Capital parses the downturn, and decides it's time to stop following the herd and to start looking for buying opportunities in bonds.
FORTUNE -- Howard Marks, the founder of the $79.5 billion Oaktree Capital, sent out his latest 13-page investment letter last week. The missive, titled "What's Behind the Downturn," lays out how a confluence of current events has weighed on markets and caused some of the MOREKatie Benner - Sep 13, 2011 9:47 AM ET
Hiking taxes on the rich has a long history of backfiring. Let's learn from history.
By Geoff Colvin, senior-editor-at-large
FORTUNE -- Is it socially and politically okay to do what we've just done -- commit to cutting federal spending by trillions without asking anyone to pitch in by paying higher taxes? The answer is yes. In this case it's definitely okay, current market fluctuations notwithstanding. But the reasons have nothing to do MOREAug 25, 2011 5:00 AM ET
What's ailing us? It's not just unemployment. It's not just Europe's debt woes. And, no, it's not Wall Street this time. It's the takeover of the economic debate by fanatics who are up to no good. Fix that -- and maybe you fix the economy.
FORTUNE -- What the hell is going on?
Standard & Poor's, the bond-rating agency, downgrades the U.S., and the world trembles. The markets here go nuts on MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Aug 18, 2011 5:00 AM ET
Think the latest GDP numbers are bad? Just wait until the stiffs who punch the clock for Uncle Sam have their paychecks in limbo if no resolution on the debt ceiling is reached.
By Tory Newmyer, writer
FORTUNE -- The austerity consensus among policymakers in the debt ceiling debate has ensured that the federal workforce will face cuts -- just how much is still unknown. And as soon as next week, government employees MOREJul 29, 2011 12:37 PM ET
Even when a compromise is reached, the current bills proposed to lower the deficit are merely covering up long-term budget deficit issues that will need to be addressed again in the next 12 to 18 months.
By Daryl G. Jones, Hedgeye
Discussion of the debt ceiling debate has become the one of the most overhyped factors in global markets and it is a little depressing to analyze the political shenanigans going on in MOREJul 29, 2011 11:14 AM ET
The business lobby has entered the debt ceiling debate at the 11th hour with only a whimper, considering the stakes of a default for corporations.
By Tory Newmyer, writer
FORTUNE -- If the specter of a default has spooked corporate America, you wouldn't know it by watching their hired guns in Washington over the last several weeks.
Aside from sending a handful of letters urging Congress to act, the big business lobby has MOREJul 28, 2011 11:25 AM ET
Moody's expects to downgrade five states if the debt ceiling isn't raised. How these states — most led by Republicans — became totally dependent on federal dollars.
FORTUNE – Tensions are boiling over in Washington as U.S. lawmakers negotiate a plan to raise the $14.3 trillion debt limit. With an Aug. 2 deadline fast approaching, the U.S. government is nowhere close to forging a deal -- an impasse that puts its MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Jul 27, 2011 10:54 AM ET
Could it be possibly be true? Reducing the deficit and getting rid of the hated AMT? It's a long shot, but hope springs eternal.
FORTUNE -- For years, taxpayers and lawmakers have complained about the Alternative Minimum Tax. It was established in 1969 to make sure the uber-rich paid their fair share. But because the tax code doesn't factor inflation, it has increasingly cut into the pocketbooks of America's middle class.
Now MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Jul 20, 2011 5:00 AM ET
Defense spending helped create today's fiscal problems. So why isn't it being considered seriously as a way to help fix them?
FORTUNE -- Throughout the drama that's stalled Washington lawmakers in raising the $14.3 trillion debt limit, there's been little talk of slicing military spending as Republicans call for big budget cuts. Reductions to Medicare, Medicaid and possibly Social Securityhave been the bigger focus.
The talks have reached a frenzy on Capitol Hill. MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Jul 15, 2011 11:38 AM ET
|McDonald's gives Charles Ramsey free food for a year|
|Bitcoin more powerful than fastest supercomputers|
|Japan stocks rebound after big plunge|
|Mailbox comes to the iPad|
|Obamacare premiums in California lower than predicted|