By Cyrus Sanati
FORTUNE -- Banks in the U.S. have had a tough earnings season, but their counterparts across the pond in Europe seem to be having an even harder one. From Deutsche Bank to UBS to Rabobank, it seems that old demons and lackluster performance have hit the purse of nearly every integrated European bank.
But European banks have an even more worrisome problem in the form of nonperforming loans, which have more than doubled to an estimated 1.2 trillion euros in the last five years. And banks had hoped to pay off their commitments and square their legal woes with future earnings, but that hasn't gone very well. It may be time for them to finally face facts and start truly selling assets to cover their bills and clean up their balance sheets once and for all.
Deutsche Bank (DB), Europe's largest bank, shocked the market earlier this week when it reported results that were well below analyst estimates. A surprise 1.2 billion euro provision for litigation charges in the quarter ending in September pushed the firm's net income down some 94% from the same time last year to 41 million euros. That was less than a tenth of the 430 million euros expected.
And Deutsche Bank is far from alone here. It seems like every major international bank is facing similar issues -- to varying degrees of severity. Rabobank, the Dutch bank, recently said it paid some $1.1 billion for its role in manipulating Libor. Regulators aren't taking any chances here and are pushing banks to put aside the necessary cash to cover their future legal claims. Swiss regulators actually ordered UBS (UBS) to add to its litigation reserves last quarter even though it had already settled its Libor legal woes, promising to pay some $1.5 billion for its role in the worldwide scheme.
In the last few quarters the banks had actually started to decrease their legal reserves for the first time in years as many had believed that the worst was behind them. After all, it had been well over five years since the lead-up to the financial crisis. If there were any future legal issues, they gathered they could simply pay for them using current earnings.
Unfortunately it hasn't worked out that way. Not only have the legal issues continued to gnaw at earnings, the banks have had a hard time making money. For example, Deutsche took a 10% hit to its overall revenue in the last quarter thanks to poor operating performance in several key divisions. The firm's massive fixed income trading desk reported revenues that were down some 50% from the previous year.
As the banks struggle to keep their head above water they will also be expected to meet new and stringent capital reserve requirements. The European Central Bank announced last week it would be conducting new stress tests on 128 banks to see if they have the necessary capital on hand to deal with another financial crisis. With diminished cash on hand due to the poor operations and even more stashed away in litigation reserves, the banks will need to somehow pump up their equity to meet the European capital requirements, which call for banks to have at least 8% of their capital on hand at all times.
Banks in the eurozone have clearly been backed into a corner. The stress tests performed by the ECB are expected to be more stringent than the ones in the past, so many banks will need to shore up their capital base. This is made even more pressing given that the banks have some 1.2 trillion euros of nonperforming loans on their books, according to a report by PwC. That means that they will probably need to be written down, requiring the banks to raise even more capital.
Banks have several ways to address this solvency issue. They could hoard capital by cutting back on lending, but regulators probably won't let them do that. They could sell more stock, but issuing equity in this manner dilutes current shareholders, making them very angry. Banks that are in real trouble could ask for assistance from their respective governments, but this really hurts the bank's reputation and adds a whole host of new problems.
Probably the best way to get out of this mess would be for the banks to simply offload assets. This would lower the amount of capital they would need to have on hand, since it shrinks the denominator in the capital buffer equation. Banks in Europe have around 46 trillion euros in assets, so there is plenty of stuff they can sell. But they have been reticent to shrink. So far this year, European banks have sold just 46 billion euros in assets, equating to a tiny 1% of total assets.
As such, the European banks will need to step up their asset sales in the next few months if they hope to meet their capital requirements and fill the holes left by failed loans. PwC estimates that the banks could offload some 2.4 trillion euros next year. While that is a significant bump up from sales this year, it still might not be enough to meet the new capital requirements.
But too many assets hitting the market at the same time could be counterproductive as it would send asset prices tumbling. The ECB could prevent a massive fire sale by creating a resolution trust corporation that the banks could transfer assets to for sale at a later date. This would get the assets off the banks' balance sheets without having to take a nasty write-down, which would make the situation even worse.
It seems like the earliest movers will be able to gain the best prices for their assets. American and Asian investors have poured billions into the continent this year betting on an economic recovery in the region, so they will probably be hungry for any kind of European investment vehicle. If the recent dismal earnings reports are any measure, then there will probably be plenty of assets for investors to pick through.
Banks representing the nation's largest bond investors sued the city of Richmond, which last week took steps to take over underwater mortgages through eminent domain.Nin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Aug 9, 2013 11:54 AM ET
Consultant calls recently proposed banking regulations "weapons of mass destruction."
FORTUNE -- Call it too big to succeed.
A report about the global banking industry by Boston Consulting Group, which was released on Tuesday, says new regulations and less business will force the big banks to dramatically shrink. Of the 28 global banks the consulting firm looked at, only a few of the leading players like -- Goldman Sachs (GS), Deutsche Bank MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Apr 30, 2013 2:13 PM ET
Why isn't Deutsche Bank leading iWatt's IPO anymore?
FORTUNE -- A lot can change between the time when a company files for an IPO and when it actually goes public. Revised financial statements, additional underwriters, the specific number of shares being offered, etc.
One thing that almost always remains constant, however, is the bank that's in charge (otherwise known as the "left lead," due to its physical position on the registration document). MOREDan Primack - Jun 29, 2012 2:59 PM ET
Wall Street banks appear to have finally decided it's time for change. A new crop of investment bankers are on the rise.
FORTUNE -- There are a bunch of new butts to kiss on Wall Street.
In the past few months nearly every Wall Street firm has named a new head of either its entire investment bank or one of its key businesses. Two big banks, Goldman Sachs (GS) and Citigroup (C), MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Apr 9, 2012 1:34 PM ET
Updated March 22 11:45 AM
For foreign banks, Dodd-Frank might have an escape hatch.
FORTUNE -- Foreign banks may have come up with a way to remain eligible for U.S. bailouts without having to follow some of the pesky rules that came out of the financial crisis, rules that were meant to prevent future taxpayer rescues.
Last month, German financial giant Deutsche Bank altered the legal structure of its U.S. operations so that MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Mar 21, 2012 7:40 PM ET
The regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac plans to seek billions from the biggest banks over mortgage investments. But everyone, from credit agencies to homeowners to Fannie and Freddie themselves should share the blame.
FORTUNE – The case is building against Wall Street's biggest banks over investments in mortgages that turned sour.
The New York Times reports today that the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Sep 2, 2011 1:29 PM ET
The Bank of America settlement isn't enough for some burned mortgage investors. Now a group of them wants the big banks to clean up their acts, or else face another lawsuit.
By Abigail Field, contributor
FORTUNE -- Investors in mortgage-backed securities who got cleaned out during the housing bust aren't going to take their losses lying down. The first act of investor revolt was organized by Kathy Patrick, a little-known litigator who MOREJul 26, 2011 9:43 AM ET
The government has been accused of using a big insider trading case to mask the fact that it's too weak to take on firms involved in the financial crisis. But today's action against Deutsche Bank shows that US Attorney isn't afraid of Wall Street.
FORTUNE -- Ever since the Raj Rajaratnam trial began, many have wondered why the government is cracking down on insider trading when the public thinks that there MOREKatie Benner - May 3, 2011 12:49 PM ET
The Justice Department wants to take a billion-dollar chunk out of the Wall Street mortgage-kiting machine.
The U.S. attorney for Manhattan sued Deutsche Bank (DB) Tuesday, claiming its MortgageIT unit made tens of thousands of bad loans and then duped the Federal Housing Authority into insuring them. The scheme left taxpayers holding the bag to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, the government said.
The government's civil suit was provoked by MOREColin Barr - May 3, 2011 12:19 PM ET
|Five things you didn't know about Bernie Madoff's epic scam|
|Teen millionaire helping Yahoo become cool again|
|Obamacare: 365,000 have signed up for insurance on exchanges|
|Stocks falter as budget deal raises taper risk|
|What the budget deal doesn't do|