deutsche bank
Study: Megabanks may disappear
April 30, 2013: 2:13 PM ETConsultant calls recently proposed banking regulations "weapons of mass destruction."
Study says many large banks are too big to succeed.
FORTUNE -- Call it too big to succeed.
A report about the global banking industry by Boston Consulting Group, which was released on Tuesday, says new regulations and less business will force the big banks to dramatically shrink. Of the 28 global banks the consulting firm looked at, only a few of the leading players like -- Goldman Sachs (GS), Deutsche Bank (DB), and JPMorgan Chase (JPM) -- will be able to remain at their current size, according to BCG.
The others, which include such banking behemoths as Bank of America (BAC), Barclays (BCS), Citigroup (C), Credit Suisse (CS), and Morgan Stanley (MS), will have to exit businesses, eliminate staffers, and rethink what they do in order to survive.
MORE: What could cause the next financial crisis
Even so, BCG estimates the leading players still need to cut costs relative to income by 10% in order to hit profit targets. If profits don't increase, and cuts are spread evenly, that alone could mean an additional 40,000 in layoffs from the largest banks. For all the banks, BCG sees little in the way of revenue growth in the next year or so.
And that's under the current set of regulations. Last week, Senators Sherrod Brown and David Vitter proposed a new bill that would force a handful of large U.S. banks to roughly double the amount of capital they hold to cover bad loans and investments. There's a debate as to how much this would reduce the profits of the large banks. Philippe Morel, who led the team that put together the BCG report, calls Brown-Vitter and similar proposed regulations in Europe "weapons of mass destruction." Not even Goldman or JPMorgan would be able to survive at their current size.
There are some problems with the report. First of all, it's unlikely regulators, already under attack for allowing banks to remain too big to fail, would welcome a system in which just three banks dominate the world's financial markets. Second, the report looked at various Wall Street businesses based on their current profitability to determine whether banks would be able to stay in them under higher capital rules.
But those businesses may get much more profitable when the economy recovers, which will make them viable for more banks. And it's not clear that higher capital requirements would force banks out of certain businesses. Anat Admati, a Stanford economics professor and author of The Banker's New Clothes, says higher capital requirements will make banks safer, and as a result investors will still value those stocks even if profitability drops.
MORE: Is JC Penney a better bet than Gold?
What's more, the report was focused on banks with investment banking and Wall Street-type businesses like underwriting and trading bonds, stocks, or structured financial instruments that allow others to bet on interest rates or commodity prices. That's where the bulk of new-post financial crisis rules are hitting the banks, and where business has dried up the most. So Wells Fargo (WFC), which is the nation's largest mortgage lender, fell out of the analysis. In fact, the report said that traditional lending could remain a large and profitable business for the largest banks.
But in the past decade or so there's been a rush, originally led by Citi's Sandy Weill, by the big banks to be able to do everything from provide checking accounts to derivatives. They said their Fortune 500 clients wanted it that way. And while some banks have retreated since the financial crisis, ironically with Citi having done it the most, they are still mostly pursuing the same do-it-all model. BCG's consultants say the big banks have only really gotten serious about right-sizing their business in the past year or so, and most still have a lot more to do.
"The real structural cost-cutting hasn't happened yet," says Shubh Saumya, a partner in BCG's capital markets practice. "It's been on the margin."
Update: An earlier version of this story stated that consultants at BCG thought certain large banks were likely to remain large, while other banks were likely to shrink. In fact, BCG was only offering examples of large banks that could be facing the choice of deciding whether or not to maintain their current size in the face of new regulations and lower demand for their capital market services.
-
Behind the iWatt-Deutsche Bank divorce
Why isn't Deutsche Bank leading iWatt's IPO anymore?
FORTUNE -- A lot can change between the time when a company files for an IPO and when it actually goes public. Revised financial statements, additional underwriters, the specific number of shares being offered, etc.
One thing that almost always remains constant, however, is the bank that's in charge (otherwise known as the "left lead," due to its physical position on the registration document). MORE
Dan Primack - Jun 29, 2012 2:59 PM ET -
Introducing Wall Street's new rainmakers
Wall Street banks appear to have finally decided it's time for change. A new crop of investment bankers are on the rise.
FORTUNE -- There are a bunch of new butts to kiss on Wall Street.
In the past few months nearly every Wall Street firm has named a new head of either its entire investment bank or one of its key businesses. Two big banks, Goldman Sachs (GS) and Citigroup (C), MORE
Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Apr 9, 2012 1:34 PM ET -
European banks try to get around Dodd-Frank
Updated March 22 11:45 AM
For foreign banks, Dodd-Frank might have an escape hatch.
FORTUNE -- Foreign banks may have come up with a way to remain eligible for U.S. bailouts without having to follow some of the pesky rules that came out of the financial crisis, rules that were meant to prevent future taxpayer rescues.
Last month, German financial giant Deutsche Bank altered the legal structure of its U.S. operations so that MORE
Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Mar 21, 2012 7:40 PM ET -
Outraged at banks over mortgages? Don't stop there.
The regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac plans to seek billions from the biggest banks over mortgage investments. But everyone, from credit agencies to homeowners to Fannie and Freddie themselves should share the blame.
FORTUNE – The case is building against Wall Street's biggest banks over investments in mortgages that turned sour.
The New York Times reports today that the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie MORE
Nin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Sep 2, 2011 1:29 PM ET -
Bringing the big banks to justice, one mortgage at a time
The Bank of America settlement isn't enough for some burned mortgage investors. Now a group of them wants the big banks to clean up their acts, or else face another lawsuit.
By Abigail Field, contributor
FORTUNE -- Investors in mortgage-backed securities who got cleaned out during the housing bust aren't going to take their losses lying down. The first act of investor revolt was organized by Kathy Patrick, a little-known litigator who MORE
Jul 26, 2011 9:43 AM ET -
Beyond Raj: The Feds turn attention to Wall Street
The government has been accused of using a big insider trading case to mask the fact that it's too weak to take on firms involved in the financial crisis. But today's action against Deutsche Bank shows that US Attorney isn't afraid of Wall Street.
FORTUNE -- Ever since the Raj Rajaratnam trial began, many have wondered why the government is cracking down on insider trading when the public thinks that there MORE
Katie Benner - May 3, 2011 12:49 PM ET -
Feds take billion-dollar whack at Deutsche Bank
The Justice Department wants to take a billion-dollar chunk out of the Wall Street mortgage-kiting machine.
The U.S. attorney for Manhattan sued Deutsche Bank (DB) Tuesday, claiming its MortgageIT unit made tens of thousands of bad loans and then duped the Federal Housing Authority into insuring them. The scheme left taxpayers holding the bag to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, the government said.
The government's civil suit was provoked by MORE
Colin Barr - May 3, 2011 12:19 PM ET -
Deutsche Bank's naked wrist slap
Regulators impose another minuscule fine for short-selling transgressions by giant firms.
Securities industries watchdogs have had it with naked short selling -- and if the biggest securities firms don't watch out, they could be left with some unsightly welts on their wrists.
Thursday's sort-of crackdown comes courtesy of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the industry group that kind of watches over the biggest broker-dealers. It slapped Deutsche Bank (DB) with a $575,000 fine MORE
Colin Barr - May 13, 2010 1:22 PM ET
