By Doron Levin
FORTUNE -- General Motors (GM) posted a scant $125 million first-quarter profit Thursday, an 86% drop from its profit in the same quarter one year ago, as its earnings were dented by the massive cost of an ignition-switch recall crisis, as well as losses overseas.
It was GM's worst quarterly result since emerging from bankruptcy.
The No. 1 U.S. automaker in terms of sales also said its "core earnings" were strong for the period, more than offsetting a loss of $400 million due to a currency devaluation in Venezuela and a $1.3 billion charge for recall-related costs.
The results, which beat analysts' estimates, sparked a sharp run-up in GM's share price when trading opened following the company's earnings announcement. But the rally had faded by mid-morning.
The share price spike couldn't entirely offset a larger sense of uncertainty about GM's prospects among investors, Wall Street analysts and the public. The company emerged from bankruptcy protection nearly five years ago with the help of $50 billion of aid from the U.S. government.
A year ago, GM posted an $865 million first-quarter profit and might have matched or exceeded that sum had it not been for a government safety investigation resulting in the recall of 2.6 million small cars. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the U.S. Justice Department, and outside lawyers hired by GM are probing the reasons behind a defective ignition linked to 31 accidents and 13 deaths.
Revenue in the quarter rose 1% to $37.4 billion.
GM's core financial performance was a positive surprise for the forecasts of financial analysts, who were braced for an even worse report. A factor in GM's favor was the strong performance of its line of full-size pickup trucks. Transaction prices for Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra pickups increased to $35,652 in the quarter, almost $3,000 more than a year ago. Silverado on its own averaged $36,431, or about $6,000 more per unit. Full-size pickups, from a financial standpoint, are GM's most important vehicle.
GM's results in China were a plus, where deliveries to retail customers grew 13% in the quarter. Globally, GM's sales increase was 2.3%.
Europe continued to be a trouble spot. GM's adjusted loss before interest and taxes on the continent grew to $284 million from a loss of $152 million a year earlier. Analysts had expected a loss of $436 million. Sales in Europe, meanwhile, showed a pickup during the period. Currency troubles caused a $400 million one-time charge in Venezuela.
On April 10, the automaker announced that costs related to its recall had expanded to $1.3 billion from $750 million previously.
Eleven analysts that follow GM and surveyed by Bloomberg have been tempering their earlier optimism for 2014, based on the company's performance. Two years ago, the average of their estimates was an annual profit of more than $10 billion. Now, analysts estimate that GM will earn a bit more than $5.5 billion this year.
The safety investigation is likely to hang over GM for some time, a source of worry and distraction for newly minted chief executive officer, Mary Barra. Fortunately, demand for vehicles in the U.S., GM's most important market, continues to improve.
The spotlight on GM's performance seems never to dim.
Editor's note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that GM posted an $865 billion first-quarter profit a year ago. The correct figure is $865 million.
It all depends on which headline you read.
By Nicholas Varchaver, assistant managing editor
FORTUNE -- It's earnings season again, which brings with it the regular wave of news articles about a company's latest results. But in this age of Twitter-sized attention spans and ever-more-compressed reading time, an old phenomenon brings increased peril: headline roulette. Particularly when companies' results are mixed, news outlets tend to spotlight different elements, creating headlines that MOREApr 17, 2014 11:38 AM ET
The online retailer has pitched the idea that it doesn't matter what it earns right now. That's led to a lot of guesswork and differing opinions.Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 30, 2014 5:00 AM ET
A drop in compensation and a boost from deals like Twitter's IPO helped the bank rebound from a disappointing third quarter.
FORTUNE -- Goldman Sachs' profits in the last three months of 2013 fell 19% from a year earlier to $2.3 billion, but the earnings were much better than analysts had expected.
"We believe that we are well positioned to generate solid returns as the economy continues to heal and provide considerable MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 16, 2014 8:17 AM ET
Already at record levels, corporate profits aren't likely to boost the S&P 500.Shawn Tully, senior editor-at-large - Jan 13, 2014 5:00 AM ET
During a quarter in which rival Goldman struggled, Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman made progress on a turnaround strategy.
FORTUNE -- James Gorman's Morgan Stanley makeover is finally showing results.
Despite a tough three months for Wall Street traders, Morgan Stanley's profits and revenue, driven by growth in its wealth management division, beat expectations for the third quarter. The bank earned $906 million, up from a loss of just over $1 billion MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Oct 18, 2013 10:57 AM ET
Proposed Volcker Rule hasn't stopped some of Goldman's trading businesses, and that could be a problem.
FORTUNE -- Goldman Sachs earned $1.4 billion in the third quarter, down 23% from the second. It maybe shouldn't have even earned that much.
Unlike other banks, Goldman (GS) has been slow to shut down businesses that could soon be forbidden by the so-called Volcker Rule. Named after former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker, the rule was MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Oct 17, 2013 2:31 PM ET
Accounting moves boosted bottom lines at the biggest banks this quarter. How long can this last?
FORTUNE -- Even as Washington is adding doubts to the recovery, investors have taken comfort in bank earnings. Perhaps they shouldn't be.
On Wednesday, Bank of America (BAC) said it netted $2.5 billion in the third quarter, up from basically breaking even a year ago. Shares rose, as they have at the other banks, even before MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Oct 17, 2013 10:36 AM ET
Why is Twitter using the same accounting tricks that have been criticized so many times before?
FORTUNE -- When it comes to its bottom line, Twitter would like potential investors to put on some heavily tinted rose-colored glasses.
In the registration statement for its upcoming IPO, which was filed on Thursday, Twitter said through the "eyes of management" the company had a profit of just over $21 million in the first six MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Oct 8, 2013 5:00 AM ET
What a rigorous metric called "EVA" says about the value of stocks. Hint: it ain't pretty.
FORTUNE -- Forget P/Es. Trailing, forward, westward, or eastward, the venerable price-earnings ratio tells you little more about the value of a company than its marketing budget. Or (ugh!) its "consensus analyst rating."
The best measure of how companies perform for shareholders is a wonkish tool called Economic Value Added, or EVA. The advantage of EVA is MOREShawn Tully, senior editor-at-large - Aug 19, 2013 8:51 AM ET
|Water becoming more valuable than gold|
|How the FCC's fast lane affects you|
|Will 7 Apples a day keep the bears away? - The Buzz|
|Postal workers protest Staples|
|Ex-Wal-Mart CEO Duke retired with $140 million|