FORTUNE -- Jamie Dimon likes to talk about JPMorgan Chase's fortress balance sheet. What's a little more shaky is the bank's income statement.
Next Tuesday, at its annual meeting in Tampa, JPMorgan (JPM) will reveal the results of a shareholder vote on whether the bank should split the role of CEO and chairman. Right now, Dimon holds both. Many shareholders think he should give up the chairmanship. The push for the move has gained momentum in the wake of last year's $6 billion trading loss and a litany of other run-ins with regulators in the past 12 months. The vote is expected to be close.
The main argument that Dimon and his supporters make for why the CEO should keep the chairman role as well is JPMorgan's bottom line. Bank analyst Dick Bove recently noted that only three companies in the U.S. netted more than JPMorgan last year. And that's in a year in which the bank had a $6 billion trading loss.
Dimon has indeed steered his ship toward the money waterfall while others nearly capsized and have teetered since. But at least part of the bank's profit gusher is an illusion.
Take the first quarter of this year. JPMorgan said its income rose 31% to $6.5 billion. But more than two-thirds of that gain can be attributed to some nifty accounting coming out of the bank's mortgage division and not any real improvements in JPMorgan's business.
In fact, in the first three months of the year, JPMorgan's losses from potential bad home loans was negative $198 million. That means the bank booked a near-$200 million gain based on a prediction of how much it would lose from future bad loans.
How's that possible? Accounting, as you may already know, is more art than science. Even so, JPMorgan's books are more Jackson Pollock than Norman Rockwell.
Banks aren't forced to write off bad loans when a borrower stops paying. Instead, they are allowed to wait until they have made the determination that they will never get paid back. That typically happens weeks or, more often, months after a borrower ceases mailing in checks. Banks get a lot of leeway in making that determination. Until they do, the bad loan sits on the bank's books just like any other, delaying losses.
JPMorgan has long been slower than rivals to recognize bad loans. In the first quarter of last year, for instance, JPMorgan wrote off one dollar for every 90 the bank had in bad loans. That compared to an average write-off ratio at the nation's 100 largest banks of 34 at the time. This year, that ratio at JPMorgan has shot up to 178, meaning it is writing off bad loans at nearly half the rate it was a year ago. Writing off loans at that rate rather than the industry average appears to have saved JPMorgan $697 million in the first three months of the year alone.
Other big banks have slowed their write-off rate as well. But none is nearly as slow in recognizing losses as JPMorgan. The ratio of bad loans to charge-offs at Bank of America (BAC) and Wells Fargo (WFC) was 124 and 113, respectively.
That's not the only boost JPMorgan got from its accountants. On top of taking fewer loan losses, the bank also pulled money out of the fund it has set aside to cover future bad loans. As a result, an additional $650 million made its way to JPMorgan's bottom line. The result: What could have been a loss of $1.15 billion from bad loans turned into a gain of $200 million.
JPMorgan spokeswoman Kristin Lemkau says the bulk of the company's earnings gains have come from true improvements in its business. "We have had three years of record performance driven by market share gains in every line of business," says Lemkau. She says that Dimon has regularly told investors that he does not consider loan reserve releases as quality earnings.
Of course, the economy is improving, and house prices are rising. So you would expect fewer losses. Still, the bank's nonperforming loans have dropped by only 11%, far less than the 50% drop in write-offs. What's more, the volume of home loans at JPMorgan on which borrowers haven't made a payment in more than three months suddenly jumped $3.5 billion in the first quarter. That's the first jump in seriously delinquent loans the bank has seen in more than three years and could be a sign of more problems ahead.
Even without these accounting moves, though, the bank's bottom line would have been up $600 million or 10% in the first three months of the year. So it's hard to make the case that Dimon should go. But earnings at Citigroup (C) and Wells Fargo rose 31% and 22%, respectively. That puts the indispensability of Dimon in perspective.
Equities are actually pricey, just when the "experts" are claiming they're cheap.
FORTUNE -- On Friday, May 3, the S&P 500 powered past 1600 for the first time in its history. The latest surge lifted the index's gains since the start of 2012 to 28.3% and fortified the prevailing view that this mighty market will roar far into the future.
What the optimists -- almost everyone you hear in the analyst community MOREShawn Tully, senior editor-at-large - May 7, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Mortgage loans and profits fell at the nation's largest home lender.
FORTUNE -- The Wells Fargo wagon may be in for some bumps ahead.
On Friday, the nation's third-largest bank reported that its earnings had come in better than expected. Wells (WFC) earned $5.2 billion in the first three months of the year, up 22% from same quarter a year ago. That translated to per-share earnings of $0.92. Analysts had predicted $0.88.
That MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Apr 12, 2013 9:30 AM ET
While investors brace for a slower earnings season in the first quarter, they see a turnaround later this year.
FORTUNE -- The unofficial start of corporate earnings season kicked off Monday, with Alcoa (AA) announcing how it did during the start of the year. The world's largest aluminum maker reported better than expected earnings as demand from U.S. automakers increased, but revenue fell short of expectations.
Alcoa isn't going to be the MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Apr 9, 2013 5:00 AM ET
The gap between sales and earnings growth is shrinking. That's a very good sign.
FORTUNE -- It's not always all about the bottom line.
Analysts and investors are normally focused on corporate profits. But the most interesting sign of where the market and the economy are headed this earnings season could be coming from the top of corporate ledgers, rather than the bottom.
Of the 147 companies in the S&P 500 that reported MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 28, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Profitability and compensation levels are still a concern for the investment bank.
FORTUNE -- Low interest rates and an increased desire by corporations and others to borrow powered Morgan Stanley to better-than-expected earnings in the last quarter of 2012.
Morgan Stanley earned nearly $900 million, or $0.45 a share, from continuing operations and after an accounting adjustment for its debt. That was much better than the $0.27 a share analysts expected. Earnings MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 18, 2013 9:47 AM ET
The bank's earnings were better than expected, but revenue fell, showing the strain of low interest rates.
FORTUNE - Bank of America took another step in the right direction. But the question is whether its steps are fast enough.
BofA (BAC) earned $732 million, or 3 cents a share, in the last three months of 2012, beating estimates by a penny. For all of 2012, the company earned just over $4 billion, MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 17, 2013 7:49 AM ET
The bank took in nearly $6 billion from proprietary trading in 2012, even as more plain-vanilla lending revenue continues to grow.
FORTUNE -- Here comes the new Goldman Sachs. And it looks a little bit like the old Goldman Sachs.
Goldman (GS) said Wednesday morning that it earned nearly $2.9 billion in the last three months of 2012, more than $1 billion more than analysts were expecting. Earnings per share more than MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 16, 2013 8:17 AM ET
Goldman now ranks as the second least profitable firm on Wall Street.
FORTUNE -- Goldman Sachs used to make making money look easy. Not anymore.
In the third quarter, profits at Goldman (GS) beat exceptions. It's profitability, though, was still a drag. Those are two different things. And on Wall Street often it's the latter that's more important.
Most companies make things. They then sell those things to make money. These days increasingly MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Oct 17, 2012 3:22 PM ET
Bernanke boost, though, could be short-lived.
Fortune -- Will Bernanke save bonuses? Not likely.
A number of analysts have recently upped their third quarter earnings estimates for the banks based on QE3. In mid-September, Ben Bernanke announced that the Federal Reserve will buy $40 billion worth of mortgage bonds a month until the economy recovers. Mortgage spreads, the amount banks make on home loans, have widened 0.16% since QE3 was announced, and MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Oct 2, 2012 2:03 PM ET
|McDonald's gives Charles Ramsey free food for a year|
|Mailbox comes to the iPad|
|Japan stocks rebound after big plunge|
|Bitcoin more powerful than fastest supercomputers|
|Obamacare premiums in California lower than predicted|