By Mohamed El-Erian
FORTUNE -- In Happy Feet, one of my 9-year-old daughter's favorite movies a few years ago, a young penguin (Mumble) takes on the colony's wise elders and finds a way to solve his community's hunger problem. Curiosity and innovative thinking, together with conviction and persistence, enable him to overturn conventional wisdom and the active inertia that had solidified malaise and lost potential.
Over the last five years, central banks have stumbled into the role of wise elders for western economies -- not out of desire or choice, but out of necessity. Assessing a system that persistently failed to deliver jobs and growth, the Federal Reserve has led a growing number of central banks in anchoring a new reality; that of pursuing macroeconomic objectives by pursuing the trio of very low policy interest rates, aggressive forward policy guidance, and seemingly limitless use of the balance sheet to buy securities.
This approach has evolved into a North Star for the western central banking community. Today, they are even guiding institutions, such as the Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank, who had to overcome deeply entrenched resistance to an approach that my former PIMCO colleague, Paul McCulley, described as "responsible irresponsibility." It is also influencing policies in the emerging world.
As hard and as long as they try, central bankers have yet to deliver. Indeed, outcomes have persistently fallen short of their own declared expectations. In response, they have done more of the same (active inertia).
Similar to Happy Feet, the collective seems to have no problem believing in the wise elders even though results consistently disappoint.
Equity investors respond enthusiastically to every central bank action, investing even more at higher prices. Politicians outsource, believing that their economic governance responsibilities can be left to central bankers. Facing hyperactive institutions with printing presses in their basements, bond vigilantes have been subdued into following central banks.
It is possible that the collective belief in central bankers will be validated by cumulative economic healing, the engagement of healthy balance sheets, some exciting innovations, and a more constructive politics. I sure hopes this happens. But it is certainly not a certainty as monetary policy is insufficiently supported by other policy measures. Moreover, the longer the dependence on central banks, the greater the erosion in the eventual effectiveness of their hyperactive policy stance.
Fortunately, a few have stepped up to perform the brave role of Mumble.
Some advocate correcting deficient aggregate demand by using aggressive fiscal stimulus to supplement the current monetary stance. Others are pushing deregulation and the shrinkage of government to "make room" for the private sector. And a third group favors structural reforms to increase productivity, fix market failures, and thus improve growth and employment responsiveness.
To date, and despite an active debate, none is gaining material traction. Even when they do not contradict each other, they are viewed as too partial and certainly not overwhelming enough to overcome political polarization.
In today's world, the role of disruptor needs to be approached in a different way. Rather than focus on the immediate next steps, Mumble should invert the logic, focusing first and foremost on a desirable and feasible three- to five-year vision for the western economies. This would be followed by specifying the first few steps of the journey (rather than every step, which is virtually impossible to do so with sufficient confidence in this "unusually uncertain," fluid and realigning global economy) and the milestones along the way (to ensure accountability and facilitate course corrections as needed).
Such a logic inversion increases the probability of political convergence on a common framework and, as important, popular buy-in. In the process it provides for the leadership needed to spearhead time-consistent policy responses, institutional strengthening, and global policy coordination.
Timing is, of course, as important as content. Here I am less optimistic. It may well be that the system will wait for more serious economic and social disorder before tipping into the required logic inversion.
As bad as things are -- especially for the poor, the young, the unemployed, and other vulnerable segments of the economy -- things need to get worse to overcome the enormous active inertia that is now embedded in the political systems and institutions. This is a dreadful situation. And in the meantime, we will continue to rely on central bankers using imperfect tools and raising hope.
Mohamed A. El-Erian is the CEO and co-chief investment officer of PIMCO. He also chairs the U.S. president's global development council.
Don't believe the Heritage Foundation's $6.3 trillion assumption.
FORTUNE -- As U.S. lawmakers debate a Senate bill this week on far-reaching immigration legislation, it feels a little like 2007 all over again.
That was the last time Washington took up the biggest changes in America's immigration laws in more than 20 years. Negotiations quickly broke down, however, as lawmakers were deeply split on the Senate bill offering legal status to millions of MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - May 8, 2013 12:20 PM ET
Friday's virtuous news cycle needs to continue if the U.S. economy is to overcome headwinds from Congressional dysfunction and Europe's malaise.
By Mohamed El-Erian
FORTUNE -- Most newscasts led their Friday evening shows with the record highs for the stock market and a monthly jobs report that exceeded expectations. Both bits of good news speak to an economy that continues to heal gradually. The question now, and it is an important MOREMay 6, 2013 6:45 AM ET
A new study debunks the theory that money doesn't make you any happier once you've passed a certain income threshold.
FORTUNE – They say money can't buy happiness, but a new study suggests it actually can. In fact, the more money you have, the happier you are.
That might sound obvious to some people, but studies have historically shown there's more to happiness than money. In the 1970s, economist Richard Easterlin argued MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - May 1, 2013 10:38 AM ET
Recent economic data suggests that another spring slowdown is upon us, as we've had the past three years. But it may not be real at all.
FORTUNE – When Wall Street learned Friday that the U.S. economy grew slower than expected during the start of the year, it renewed talk that we may be in for another "spring slump," if not a "spring swoon."
Whatever you call it, a slowdown in the MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Apr 29, 2013 5:00 AM ET
We're focusing too much on the present, and too little on the future.
By David Walker & Robert Kaplan
FORTUNE -- Political dysfunction in D.C. has led to the American public being barraged by continuous media reports about the fiscal cliff, the debt ceiling, and the sequester. But the political skirmishes and impasses around these short-term events are distracting us from the real danger ahead: Our reckless fiscal trajectory that threatens MOREApr 11, 2013 10:04 AM ET
Economist Dean Baker, who called the jobs market correctly in March, says the outlook for hiring is likely to remain weak.
FORTUNE -- For the past month or so, economist Dean Baker of the left-leaning Center for Economic Policy Research, has been saying that hiring wasn't nearly as strong as it appeared. Few listened, but they should have.
For March, economists on average expected employers would add about 220,000 workers to their MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Apr 9, 2013 5:00 AM ET
The most recent jobs report is vindication for the Federal Reserve's caution and its bond-buying spree. But those policies aren't helping those who have been out of a job the longest.
FORTUNE – If anyone is baffled by why the Federal Reserve hasn't shut off its money spigot, even as the U.S. economy seems brighter, take a look at today's report on the state of the jobs market. It underscores the MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Apr 5, 2013 10:52 AM ET
Ronald Reagan's former budget director, David Stockman, talks about his new book, what Republicans got wrong, and why private equity is the great deformation.
FORTUNE -- The sun shines on David Stockman, streaming through floor-to-ceiling windows in a conference room high above Midtown Manhattan. Stockman, 66, is smiling, thoroughly relishing our conversation about his new book, The Great Deformation: The Corruption of Capitalism in America. It's a 700-page polemic full of MOREKatie Benner - Apr 4, 2013 6:38 AM ET
Vehicle sales are often seen as a more accurate measure of consumer sentiment than retail or home sales. They show that tax cuts don't seem to be hampering Americans yet.
FORTUNE -- Despite higher taxes and worries over government spending cuts, consumers have surprisingly held on to their optimism. In February, they bought more of almost everything, from homes to groceries to clothes.
It's easy to doubt the positive data, given MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Mar 22, 2013 9:52 AM ET
|McDonald's gives Charles Ramsey free food for a year|
|Where your donation dollars go|
|Doomsday investors betting on market crash|
|The 'chicken poop' credit and other bad tax breaks|
|Nervous investors step back|