By John Cassidy, contributor
FORTUNE -- Poor Mitt Romney. From the GOP primaries, when members of his own party labeled him a "vulture capitalist," to the start of the campaign proper, when one of his top aides vouchsafed that he would follow an "Etch A Sketch" strategy, to the infamous "47%" video, in which he labeled half the country moochers -- his campaign was a case study in unforced errors and futility. Today, though, I come to praise Romney, not to bury him. In failing in his quest to reach the White House, he unwittingly made an important contribution to the country's future: He discredited fuzzy math.
For decades now, politicians in both parties, but particularly the Republicans, have been promising voters the earth, using arithmetic tricks and outright whoppers to explain why they wouldn't have to pay for it -- why, in fact, they could have their cake and eat it in the form of new tax cuts. As night follows day, higher spending and lower revenues have led to bigger deficits and more debt.
Romney promised more of the same. During the GOP primaries, under attack from his rivals for being too timid, he hastily put together a new economic plan, the centerpiece of which was a 20% cut in income tax rates: The 35% rate would go to 28%, the 28% rate would go to 22.4%, and so on. At the same time, he pledged not to cut a dime from Medicare or Social Security, and to boost the Pentagon budget by up to $2 trillion over 10 years. Asked how he would finance this largesse, he talked vaguely about reducing or eliminating tax breaks, but didn't specify which and explicitly ruled out tackling some big revenue losers, such as the low rates on dividends and capital gains.
In time-honored fashion, Romney was offering the American voters a free lunch, and why not? It worked for Ronald Reagan, who cut taxes and gave a blank check to the Pentagon; for George W. Bush, who cut taxes, started two costly wars, and introduced a prescription-drug program for retirees; and for Barack Obama, who cut taxes, boosted infrastructure spending, and introduced universal health care. For a while there, Romney's tax strategy appeared to be working too. But then some nonpartisan authorities, such as the Tax Policy Center, started to question its figures, pointing out that the revenue raised wouldn't nearly cover the cost of the giveaways.
For once, the voters listened. The tax plan, far from winning the election for Romney, handicapped him all the way to Nov. 6. With even conservative commentators such as George Will saying it didn't add up, he was forced to issue a series of clarifications -- insisting he would neither balloon the deficit nor introduce backdoor tax hikes on the middle class. In the final weeks, he deemphasized tax cuts, focusing on his plans to boost domestic energy production and help small businesses. It was a tacit admission that his effort to flout the laws of arithmetic had failed.
That, surely, is progress -- as is President Obama's insistence that the Bush tax cuts for the very rich be reversed. Going forward, there will doubtless be more presidential candidates who place tax cuts at the center of their platforms. But after seeing what happened to Romney, they will have to do some proper cost projections and specify where the money will be made up -- what areas of spending will be cut, which tax breaks will be eliminated, and how much revenue will come from higher growth. Nothing less will be considered credible.
The next step on the road to fiscal sanity is to tackle the shibboleth that in no circumstances, even a looming fiscal crisis, should taxes be raised on middle class people, where "middle class" is defined to include families earning upwards of $200,000 a year. So far, neither Obama nor anybody in the Republican leadership has been brave enough to go that far. But let's be grateful for small mercies. In the election of 2012 a particularly egregious exercise in fuzzy math failed.
This story is from the December 3, 2012 issue of Fortune.
It's helped make corporate America run better. It might just be the ticket to get our lawmakers back on track.
By Sheila Bair, contributor
FORTUNE -- Will the elections bring about improvements in our increasingly dysfunctional government? I fear not. Successfully running for office these days is more about political fundraising and negative campaigning than about the art of governing. Only one in 10 Americans thinks Congress is doing a good MORENov 6, 2012 5:00 AM ET
After amassing great wealth building TD Ameritrade, Joe Ricketts bought the Chicago Cubs for his family. Now he is spending millions to promote his political vision and unseat the president. Meet a big behind-the-scenes player in the newly deregulated electoral system.
By Jennifer Reingold, senior editor
FORTUNE -- I am perched atop a hay bale in the glorious Wyoming mountains, the majestic Teton Range crowning a landscape of unspoiled beauty. Surrounding MORESep 21, 2012 5:00 AM ET
A little mud slinging is inevitable in a heated race such as this year's. But out-and-out lies? Let's set the record straight.
FORTUNE – Last summer I wrote in this space that Mitt Romney's political ambitions would hurt private equity. What I didn't realize at the time was that private equity would also hurt politics.
We have come to expect a certain amount of half-truths and message spinning in our electoral discourse. MOREDan Primack - Aug 21, 2012 5:00 AM ET
If he's elected to a second term, President Obama is likely to stop making concessions to the GOP on economic measures and force a confrontation - right away.
By Tory Newmyer, writer
FORTUNE -- President Obama started his first term with a bang, simultaneously engineering an auto industry rescue, stabilizing a teetering Wall Street, and negotiating a massive stimulus package to wrench the economy back from the brink. The experience may MOREAug 16, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Neither Obama nor Romney talks about the hard choices America needs to make to solve its economic woes. So we will.
FORTUNE -- Partisan politics and tired talking points aren't solving America's economic woes. Mitt Romney says he'll prime the economy with pro-business measures; Barack Obama says he's going to increase stimulus spending while reducing the deficit. But is either talking about the hard choices America needs to make? Fortune's Geoff MOREAug 16, 2012 5:00 AM ET
In a Fortune interview, the Republican presidential candidate lays out his plan for America now and another four years down the road.
FORTUNE -- On Monday August 6, Mitt Romney spoke by phone to Fortune's Andy Serwer in New York and David Whitford in Boston. He touched on gun control, his tax-cut proposal, his five-point (boiled down from 59) plan to fix the economy, and answered this burning question: If you MOREAug 15, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Helped by an all-star team of advisers - and now Paul Ryan - the Republican candidate maps out ways to stimulate business.
By David Whitford with Doris Burke
FORTUNE -- On the Friday after the Fourth of July, while the Romney clan was enjoying an extended midsummer break at the family manse on New Hampshire's Lake Winnipesaukee and photographers with telephoto lenses were snagging pictures of the candidate in swim trunks, MOREAug 15, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Job-hunters getting back on track is encouraging, but it's likely to bump up the unemployment rate. And that could give Mitt Romney some much-needed ammo as the election gets closer.
By John Cassidy, contributor
FORTUNE -- Uh-oh! Those deep breaths you can hear are coming from the White House. With November fast approaching, it is facing the possibility that the unemployment rate, which has come down sharply in the past six MOREApr 26, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Obama and Romney each have a plan to lift Middle America from its rut, but election-year promises aren't going to fix an issue that's been brewing for decades.
By Geoff Colvin, senior editor-at-large
FORTUNE -- President Obama likes to say, "The 2012 election is a make-or-break moment for the middle class." He's mistaken -- it isn't. Mitt Romney likes to say, "This President and his policies have made it harder on the American MOREMar 30, 2012 5:00 AM ET
|Make $30 an hour, no bachelor's degree required|
|The 'chicken poop' credit and other bad tax breaks|
|McDonald's gives Charles Ramsey free food for a year|
|Why Waze is a hot takeover target|
|Hedge fund guru says moms and trading don't mix|