Gingrich culpability in Romney loss

November 9, 2012: 11:45 AM ET

Newt GingrichIf Republicans are looking for someone to blame, they should look inside their own tent.

FORTUNE -- In the aftermath of President Obama's victory over Mitt Romney, there has been a lot of attention paid to how the Obama campaign successfully defined Romney as an out-of-touch corporate raider. And most of the credit has gone to Obama campaign boss Jim Messina, who made a "grand bet" to saturate the summer airwaves with anti-Romney ads while the GOP nominee was still recovering from a drawn-out primary battle.

But this victory narrative misses a very large point: Messina's gamble was enabled by Newt Gingrich.

The Romney campaign was well aware that Bain Capital would become a major issue in the general election. After all, the late Ted Kennedy had created the blueprint in his 1994 Senate race against Romney (the only time Romney had run against a Democrat, and lost).

What it didn't expect, however, was that one of its primary opponents would bring the issue to the fore. After all, John McCain didn't touch the subject four years earlier -- with the only mention of Bain coming from Mike Huckabee, who suggested that Bain's ownership of Clear Channel was why he had failed to secure endorsements from some of the company's conservative radio hosts.

"No one in the campaign believed that Republicans would attack business enterprise in a primary contest," explains a Romney campaign consultant who declined to be identified. "That was, in hindsight, a big mistake."

The first jabs came from Rick Perry, who accused Romney in an early January debate of being a "vulture capitalist." But the heavy artillery was manned by Newt Gingrich, who began accusing Romney of "looting" companies. More importantly, a super PAC supporting Gingrich released a 28-minute video titled "When Mitt Romney Came to Town" -- full of ominous music and tales of woe from workers at companies acquired by Bain Capital.

Never mind that much of the video was misleading, or that Gingrich would later try to disassociate himself from the tape. The negative seed was planted, particularly in the minds of independent voters who had never before heard of Bain Capital or private equity.

If even stalwart Republicans like Newt Gingrich had a problem with what Romney did at Bain Capital, then it would be much harder to dismiss the subsequent Obama campaign attacks as partisan, anti-business rhetoric. Instead, Messina's "grand bet" was really just sweetening an existing pot -- reinforcing a caricature first drawn by Gingrich. And the Romney campaign had lost complete control of its own candidate's image.

"By late summer there wasn't even one particular thing he did at Bain that really mattered anymore," the consultant says. "In fact, you didn't even have to say Bain. People just instinctively believed that he had outsourced people, fired people, not cared about people. It wasn't about what had actually happened, or about policy. It wasn't substantive. But it got the job done."

Sign up for Dan's daily email newsletter on deals and deal-makers: GetTermSheet.com

  • Post-election: Bain & Co. exec speaks out

    Senior executive with Bain & Co. reflects and looks ahead.

    FORTUNE -- The long election season is now over, with President Obama appearing to have won reelection. Before the votes were counted, I spent some time on the phone with Phil Kleweno, head of the Washington, D.C. office for consulting firm Bain & Co., to get his thoughts on how the campaign affected his firm and on what his clients can MORE

    - Nov 6, 2012 11:13 PM ET
  • VCs' love-hate relationship with the GOP

    Venture capitalists hate their taxes but love green energy. Here's how the issues stack up for the financiers now that the Republicans run the House.

    Venture capitalists are difficult to define politically. On the one hand, they are wealthy financiers who fit snugly in the Republican wheelhouse. On the other, most of them live in Democratic bastions like suburban Boston and Silicon Valley.

    This partisan split also appears in the specific policies MORE

    - Nov 4, 2010 10:55 AM ET
  • Parsing the Republican economic agenda

    The Republicans now have a platform to voice their positions on economic policy, even if their bills never land on President Obama's desk. Here's how they'll likely approach the hotly debated issues.

    With the midterm elections behind us, the stage is now set for the 2012 presidential election. Like Democrats, Republicans on the campaign trail spent much of the time touting job creation. But now that the GOP dominates the MORE

    - Nov 3, 2010 12:08 PM ET
  • One sector really loves gridlock: Financials

    By Joshua Steiner and Allison Kaptur, Hedgeye

    With the election underway, we thought it would be helpful to look back at how financial stocks have performed relative to other sectors in times of both divided government and a gain in Republican power. The following charts tell the tale.

    The first chart shows broad sector performance from 1972 to present during times of divided and unified government. We define divided government as any MORE

    Nov 2, 2010 10:44 AM ET
  • On the campaign trail, financial reform is taboo

    Why Democrats have been told not to tout their votes for Wall Street reform, the party's only popular legislative achievement.

    by Tory Newmyer, writer

    To get a measure of just how toxic the political atmosphere is for Democrats, consider this: Incumbents are so wary of touting their records, they are largely ignoring Wall Street reform, the only broadly popular item among the party's major legislative accomplishments.

    Back in mid-July, with the bill on MORE

    Oct 14, 2010 2:24 PM ET
Current Issue
  • Give the gift of Fortune
  • Get the Fortune app
  • Subscribe
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.