energy

Consumer misbehavior: Why we're terrible at buying appliances

April 15, 2014: 2:48 PM ET

Research shows that consumers aren't very good at buying appliances that will save them money in the long run, even when they are explicitly told about those savings.

<> on March 26, 2010 in Marin City, California.

FORTUNE -- Much of economics is based on the simple idea that people prefer cheaper products to more expensive ones. But what if that's not always the case?

Those working within the blossoming field of behavioral economics have explored the ways in which humans function (or don't, as the case may be) as rational actors, and new studies show just how bad we can be at making the best decisions for ourselves. One such working paper, published Monday by the National Bureau of Economic Research, looks at the strange decisions Americans make when it comes to purchasing, of all things, water heaters.

Why water heaters, you ask? The authors of the paper, economists Hunt Allcott and Richard Sweeney, chose this item because the sticker price of water heaters varies considerably based on how energy efficient they are, and the total cost of the product requires consumers to understand both the sticker price and the price of the appliances' energy use over time. The authors say water heaters are a good subject for study "precisely because they are so mundane. Consumers rarely think about their water heater until it breaks unexpectedly, at which point they want to replace it quickly, with limited time for search and information acquisition."

This is the logic behind the "Energy Star," a program in which companies submit their products to the EPA or Department of Energy for efficiency testing, and products that meet certain energy requirements get the "Energy Star" seal. Many of these products are so efficient that even though they are have higher sticker prices, they actually are less expensive for the consumer in the long run. Labeling these products as "Energy Star" products helps close the information gap for consumers who want to act rationally and buy the truly cheaper product.

MORE: 3 reasons the economy has some spring in its step

But Allcott and Sweeny's work calls into question whether the Energy Star label encourages consumers to buy the least expensive (in the long run) product. The economists embedded themselves with a "large nationwide retailer" that sells about 45,000 water heaters every year. They studied the buying habits of roughly 20,000 potential customers who called about water heater purchases, examining how sales of energy-efficient models were affected by heavy incentives like $100 rebates for customers and $25 sales incentives for salespeople who sold energy-efficient models. They found that even with the rebates, which often increased the typical customer's return on investment to 28% t0 37%, customers overwhelming chose to buy a water heater with a lower sticker price.

Consumers have an irrational bias against high upfront costs, even when they are aware that the cost of the product will be cheaper in the long run. 

The study's findings also have implications for policymakers. Consider the public battle over incandescent lightbulbs. In 2007, President George W. Bush signed the "Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007," which, among other things, banned the manufacture of most incandescent light bulbs in use at that time because they were too energy inefficient. Despite industry innovation in the light bulb market that reduced the total cost of lighting (bulb and electricity included), customers still went for the cheap and familiar incandescent bulbs they were used to. They needed to be nudged into submission to opt for the energy-efficient bulbs.

MORE: Long-term unemployment: What the U.S. can learn from Sweden

Yale economist William Nordhaus has studied the economics of climate change extensively, and sees "energy-cost myopia" as a prime reason the government should regulate markets for appliances. In his recent book The Climate Casino, Nordhaus compares regulations that require efficient products to those that require cars to include airbags. "Since people do not always behave in their long-run self interest, careful use of regulatory mandates can save lives (in the case of airbags) or money and CO2 emissions (in the case of effective energy regulations)," he writes.

This is the justification for many government programs, from Social Security to unemployment insurance. People don't always behave in their best interests, and despite the high-profile complaining about the disappearance of certain lightbulbs, we're all better off without them.

  • Don't hold your breath for a carbon tax

    Senate finance committee head Ron Wyden sees a bright future for renewable energy but downplays the chances of Congress putting a tax on fossil fuels.

    By Brian Dumaine

    FORTUNE -- Senator Ron Wyden (D., Ore.) is the new head of the Senate finance committee and previously had chaired that body's energy committee. Fortune talked to him in early April at the Bloomberg New Energy Future of Energy Summit in New York City MORE

    Apr 9, 2014 5:00 AM ET
  • Exxon performance, spending cuts rattle investors' nerves

    In a year in which oil approached historic highs, Exxon failed to deliver as expected. And its recent decision to cut spending has sent shivers down investors' spines.

    By Cyrus Sanati

    FORTUNE -- If it wasn't clear before, it certainly is now: Big Oil has got some big problems.

    In a year in which oil remained near historic highs at around $100 a barrel, ExxonMobil (XOM), the all-around best-in-class energy company, said MORE

    Mar 6, 2014 3:48 PM ET
  • Hess successfully shrinks itself to grow

    Amid pressure from investors who argued the company had stretched itself too thin, Hess has shed assets and is moving forward as a streamlined company.

    Dec 4, 2013 10:52 AM ET
  • Investors sound the alarm on climate change

    Why a coalition worth $3 trillion is calling on the oil, gas, coal, and energy industries to reassess the risks of a warming planet

    By Ryan Bradley, senior editor

    FORTUNE -- If human-caused climate change is accepted as a certainty -- it is, by 95% of scientists (a higher percentage, by the way, than agree that smoking causes cancer) -- what are the ramifications for business? If you are in the keeping-back-the-sea biz, rising seas will MORE

    Oct 24, 2013 11:41 AM ET
    Posted in: , , ,
  • John Doerr's energy game changer?

    What company does John Doerr believe will revolutionize energy?

    FORTUNE -- Venture capitalist John Doerr today said at TC Disrupt that the real energy "game changer" would be tripling battery life, rather than the incremental increases we've seen over the past several years. Then he said that he has invested in a start-up that has pulled off the feat in a lab, but declined to identify it.

    I'm not 100% certain, but MORE

    - Sep 11, 2013 2:07 PM ET
  • For this tepid economy, there's only one way out

    A stunning government report says the U.S. economy has gone through a frightening structural change since the recession: a reduction in our capacity to grow. Here's what we need to do to turn things around.

    By Shawn Tully, senior editor-at-large

    FORTUNE -- A wonder of America is that, after every downturn, the economy inevitably regains its old, formidable growth trajectory. In good times, the U.S. expands its output faster than any MORE

    Aug 15, 2013 8:00 AM ET
  • Chevron is making a mistake in Argentina

    Despite all the legal, political, and business risks, Chevron has unapologetically doubled down on Argentina with a partnership with the state-controlled energy company YPF.

    by Cyrus Sanati

    FORTUNE -- Chevron is taking quite a gamble snuggling up with Argentina. The U.S. oil giant confirmed this week it is officially partnering up with Argentina's (now) state-controlled energy company, YPF, in a bid to help the firm develop the South American nation's potentially vast MORE

    Jul 19, 2013 5:00 AM ET
  • Private equity's new energy kings

    Riverstone Holdings emerges from scandal with a huge new fund.

    FORTUNE -- Four years ago, Riverstone Holdings was messier than an oil slick.

    The energy-focused private equity firm's longtime partner, The Carlyle Group (CG), was pulling away in order to form its own energy investing platform. Firm co-founder David Leuschen had admitted to bankrolling a low-budget film produced by the brother of an influential public pension fund manager in New York. And MORE

    - Jun 20, 2013 2:49 PM ET
  • In U.S. energy boom, a growing tax dodge

    More energy companies are converting to a tax-free status that was once reserved for a small segment of the industry.

    FORTUNE -- More and more of the companies benefiting from new technologies that are fueling America's recent energy boom are paying little or no taxes.

    In early May, Emerge Energy Services sold $127 million in shares in an initial public offering. Emerge (EMES) supplies sand to oil and gas drillers for blasting MORE

    - May 28, 2013 9:19 AM ET
Current Issue
  • Give the gift of Fortune
  • Get the Fortune app
  • Subscribe
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.