FORTUNE -- The number of banks in danger of failing is the lowest since the beginning of the financial crisis. That sounds like good news, until you consider this: There are still 11 times more problem banks in the U.S. than there were back in early 2007, before the financial crisis. And the number is shrinking slowly.
The slight dip seems particularly odd given the fact that there seem to be few signs of the financial crisis elsewhere. The Dow Jones industrial average (INDU) has recently been hitting new highs. The pipeline on Wall Street for the types of risky loans and structure products that got banks into trouble in the first place is starting to open up again. Hedge funds are making huge gains buying and selling subprime mortgages. And Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are solidly profitable, and returning money to the Treasury.
Yet a large number of banks continue to languish. On Wednesday, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said there are 612 banks in the U.S. that are in danger of failing. That's down from 651 at the end of last year, but it's still way up from 53 in early 2007.
By end of 2009, that number had shot up to over 700, and peaked at 884 at the end of 2010. But while the way up was a steep incline, the way back to recovery has been more of slope and a gradual one at that. The question is why has it taken so long for U.S. banks to recover.
And the pace of bank recovery seems to be slower than in past crises. For instance, in the last major financial crisis in the U.S., the number of problem banks peaked in 1990 at 1,496. Two years after that recession ended, in early 1991, the list was down by over 60% from the top. The most recent recession has been officially over for nearly four years. Yet the number of troubled banks is still only down 30%.
Other than the total number of banks on its list, the FDIC says little about the problem bank list. It doesn't say which banks they are, or where they are located. A spokesman for the FDIC declined to comment on why the list is coming down so slowly.
The presumption is that most of the banks on the list are relatively small. The average bank on the problem bank list has just under $350 million in assets. JPMorgan Chase (JPM), the largest bank in the U.S., has $2 trillion in assets. And the average size of problem banks has dropped over the past two years from just over $450 million. The FDIC also reported on Wednesday that the conditions at the largest banks in the country continue to improve.
So part of the problem could be the outsized influence of large banks. The government seems less interested than in the past in helping small banks recover. That's probably because they matter less to the economy than they used to. In the S&L Crisis, regulators launched a multi-year effort to rid the banks of troubled assets. This time around, small banks that wanted it got a piece of the bailout pie. But the small bank bailout has mostly been a disaster. The bailout money seems to have done little to help their finances.
A recent report from the Government Accountability Office found that 107 of the banks on the FDIC's problem list got bailout money from the federal government. What's more, SIGTARP, the government agency assigned to police the bank bailout program, found that banks that got government assistance generally lent out less than those that didn't. Worse, the government has been ditching its stakes in small banks as fast as it can, despite the fact that many of those banks are still troubled.
One answer could be that the FDIC is being tougher on small banks in the wake of the financial crisis, leaving many banks on the problem list that in the past would have been given a clean bill of health in the past. That's a good thing.
Recently, there has been some debate about small banks and large banks and regulation. The Independent Community Bankers Association of America, which represents small banks, has jumped on the bandwagon that the U.S. needs to do more to end Too Big to Fail, which means more and stricter regulation of the big banks. The incoming president of the organization, John Buhrmaster, says he would be for Brown-Vitter, the bill that would force the big banks to hold a lot more capital.
But Tom Brown, a veteran bank analyst who runs Second Curve Capital, says that small banks remain much more concentrated in local commercial real estate loans than their larger rivals, and are therefore more at risk of failing in the next crisis than the big banks.
"If big banks showed the same sort of loan concentrations of many community banks, regulators would force out their managements," Brown recently wrote in a blog post.
What's more, as Brown points out, the big increase in lending to community banks' "bread-and-butter," small businesses, in the past few years has come from large banks. Mortgage lending, too, used to be a pretty good money-maker for the community banks, but the big banks took over that business more than a decade ago. One of the paradoxes of the financial crisis is that it left us with even bigger banks than before. Regulators are focused on doing what they can to make sure those banks are safe from failure. But those regulations may be making the road to recovery for the small banks that much longer. That's the trade off.
As the fiscal cliff loomed, companies and individuals stashed cash into plain vanilla accounts.
FORTUNE -- There are still signs of nervousness about the market and the economy.
A near record $312 billion poured into bank accounts in the fourth quarter of 2012. That was roughly three times the average jump in those accounts in each of the prior three quarters. It was also likely the second largest quarterly increase in MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Feb 7, 2013 1:52 PM ET
As the financial system melted down in the fall of 2008, the Treasury Department gave the nation's biggest banks billions in new capital. Was it all necessary? No, says the former FDIC chief in her new book.
By Sheila Bair, contributor
FORTUNE -- Few players had as close a view of the financial crisis as Sheila Bair, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. from June 2006 to July 2011. In MORESep 20, 2012 5:00 AM ET
FDIC report shows lending continues to lag the recovery.
FORTUNE -- The financial crisis could be over, but it's not clear the credit crunch is.
On Thursday, the FDIC said that bank profits were the highest they have been in nearly five years. U.S. banks earned $35.3 billion in the first three months of the year. That was up $6.6 billion from the same quarter a year ago, and nearly double what MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - May 24, 2012 11:59 AM ET
Government plan for troubled banks involves a temporary take-over by Uncle Sam.
FORTUNE -- The next Lehman Brothers may not happen over the course of a weekend. It could take a couple of months. The question is if that would be an improvement.
On Thursday, Martin Gruenberg, who is the acting chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., speaking at a conference put on by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, laid MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - May 10, 2012 4:55 PM ET
Elite money manager Paul Singer is a passionate defender of the 1% and a rising Republican power broker. He's determined to put a candidate who shares his views back in the White House.
By Michelle Celarier, contributor
FORTUNE -- As he gears up for the final stretch in the marathon that is the Republican nomination campaign, Mitt Romney has no shortage of eminent financiers to call on -- for advice or money. MOREMar 26, 2012 5:00 AM ET
It's time for our financial institutions to get back to basics: making money off good customer service - not wild speculation.
By Sheila Bair, contributor
FORTUNE -- Financial reformers are pointing to the collapse of the $41 billion MF Global brokerage house as evidence of why we need Dodd-Frank's "Volcker Rule" to prohibit FDIC-insured banks and their affiliates from making proprietary bets on the markets. Fortunately, MF Global was not a bank or MOREDec 9, 2011 5:00 AM ET
The zombie banking industry took another half step forward Tuesday.
The list of banks at risk of failing expanded at its slowest rate since before the credit crisis, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said. The so-called problem bank list rose by just four institutions to 888, FDIC chief Sheila Bair said.
That's still the highest number in two decades and the highest ratio since 1987 as a share of existing banks. It's a fact that MOREColin Barr - May 24, 2011 10:39 AM ET
Sheila Bair is still fuming over the feds' half-hearted tilt at the big foreclosure mills.
The Fed and the Treasury last month issued enforcement actions against the big mortgage banks, led by Bank of America (BAC), JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Wells Fargo (WFC). While the feds insisted their crackdown would help fix robosigning and related ills, Bair -- who is chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. -- took issue with the action, saying MOREColin Barr - May 12, 2011 1:24 PM ET
Think Washington is going soft on the banks again? You have company – at the FDIC, no less.
The three primary federal bank regulators – the Federal Reserve, the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency – issued enforcement actions Wednesday that order the biggest U.S. banks to clean up their foreclosure mills.
The move, affecting 14 institutions and promising fines at some undetermined point down MOREColin Barr - Apr 13, 2011 3:48 PM ET
|Kickstarter pulls plug on scam minutes before $120,000 heist|
|Feds seize 14 7-Eleven stores in ID theft case|
|10,000 Apple accounts subject to data requests|
|Google stock split closer to reality|
|NASA selects more women astronauts|