FORTUNE -- As Wall Street predictions go, Jamais Cascio had a good one. A little less than a year ago, Cascio, a distinguished fellow at think tank Institute for the Future, in a blog post, predicted that retweeting Twitter bots combined with a fake news story posted by hackers on a major media website would cause a market crash. That's pretty close to what happened.
By now, you probably know about the so-called Tweet Retreat. On Tuesday, the market dropped 140 points within minutes of a fake tweet about a bombing at the White House. It came from the AP, which said it was hacked. The market recovered just as fast.
Nonetheless, the micro-crash added a new worry to those who are concerned that a glitch in the increasing number of computers trading stocks at lightning-fast speeds will sink the market and erase our retirement accounts: High-frequency reading.
In fact, Wall Street's computers have been "reading" the news for a while. Dow Jones and Thomson Reuters (TRI) both offer services that convert their news articles into a digitized form that can be fed into computer trading algorithms. They do this by tagging individual words and then assigning a sentiment ranking to those words. The computers add up those sentiment ranks to determine if the news is negative or positive for a particular company or the stock market in general. A sentence with the words bombing, White House, Obama, and injured would presumably get a pretty negative rating.
Back in 2009, Streambase, a company that provides technology to high-speed trading firms, began giving its clients the ability to incorporate tweets into their trading programs that decide when to automatically buy or sell. It's not clear whether the Dow Jones and Reuters services include twitter in their digitized news feeds. Bloomberg recently began incorporating tweets into its terminals. Last year, at a Wall Street technology conference, Harvard professor Chris Malloy estimated that nearly one-third of all high-frequency trading firms were evaluating whether to include such things as news articles along with traditional market data into their computer trading algorithms.
So it's likely that the computers of a good number of high-speed trading firms "read" the fake White House bombing tweet.
Still, it's unlikely that computers were the ones that started Tuesday's micro-crash. The fake tweet went out 1:07 PM and 50 seconds. According to Eric Hunsader, who runs market research firm Nanex, the first high-frequency trading firms didn't react to the fake tweet until 15 seconds after that. Most algorithms are written to respond to data within milliseconds. What's more, most only respond to specific market-moving news events, like the monthly jobs number.
So Hunsader thinks humans made the first trades based on the fake tweet. Nonetheless, computer trading algorithms, trained to follow the market, likely piled into the selling once it got started. Hunsader says that computer trading systems may have incorporated the potentially bad news into their algorithms. When actual selling began to occur, those systems were primed and headed for the exits faster than usual. The result: Hunsader says 20% of the market's trading volume disappeared in 20 seconds, a faster retreat than what was seen in the flash crash of a few years ago.
"It tells me that the diversity of traders in the market is gone," says Hunsader. "Just a bunch of machines that act like lemmings."
But given the fact that the market rebounded, as it had done in the past, it's hard to tell who got hurt. Mutual funds are trading all the time, slowly working through their large orders. High-frequency traders, Hunsader says, prey on mutual funds and other slow-moving traders. Events like the Twitter crash allow them to really take advantage.
"High-frequency traders are always taking portions of pennies away all the time. In this case they were able to take a whole bunch of whole pennies at once," says Hunsader. And Hunsader said that's typical in the market today. "No one really gets killed in these micro-crashes, but there are a lot of paper cuts."
Worse, Hunsader says high-frequency trading firms are likely to view the Twitter crash as an opportunity. Now that they have seen how fast a tweet, even an erroneous one, can move the market, traders are sure to do what they can to capitalize on it next time.
"If anything, this is likely to accelerate the development cycle of [reading] technology," says Hunsader. "In the future, the impact of a false tweet could be a lot worse."
The reason for stock market skittishness might be more mundane than high-frequency trading and computer algorithms gone amuck.
FORTUNE -- The TABB Group, a research firm that specializes in stock trading and technology, is out with what appears to be a concerning stat: Just 2% of professional investors completely trust the market.
It's become a common line to say that Knight Capital's recent trading glitch, the bungled Facebook IPO and the 2010 MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Aug 23, 2012 11:04 AM ET
Although regulators have put small changes in place in the U.S. markets since last May's flash crash, our hyper-wired interconnected markets still aren't equipped to prevent another one.
By David Leinweber, contributor
There are more than a few weird moments in the history of markets and computers. Two UCLA students used 125 stock board messages to send a dead penny stock up more than 106,600% one morning more than a MOREFeb 22, 2011 11:47 AM ET
Regulators seeking a flash crash fix are looking at the right menu but have yet to show an appetite for anything really spicy.
So says John Bates, the chief technology officer at Progress Software (PRGS) and a member of the technological advisory committee advising trading watchdogs probing the market structure problems underlying the May 6 stock market meltdown.
Bates applauds the report issued Friday by another panel, the Joint CFTC-SEC Advisory Committee MOREColin Barr - Feb 18, 2011 12:57 PM ET
Today's mini-flash crash victim is Progress Energy.
Trading in shares of Progress (PGN), a Raleigh, N.C., utility operator, were halted for five minutes Monday afternoon after the stock briefly plunged 90% for no apparent reason.
The stock dropped from around $44.50 to $4.57 just before 1 p.m. EDT before resuming trading above $44 a few minutes later. The New York Stock Exchange, where Progress shares are listed, said the troublesome trade took MOREColin Barr - Sep 27, 2010 2:07 PM ET
Trading in steelmaker Nucor was halted briefly Tuesday morning after the stock staged something of a mini-flash crash.
Nucor (NUE) shares were halted for five minutes at 11:52 a.m. EDT after 100 Nucor shares traded at a penny each, a spokesman for the New York Stock Exchange said. The stock has spent most of the day between $39 and $40.
The hundred-shares-for-a-dollar trade triggered a so-called volatility trading pause, because it meant MOREColin Barr - Sep 14, 2010 1:19 PM ET
The new plan to stop runaway stocks works, and it works well. Now to figure out what makes them freak out in the first place.
By Heidi N. Moore, contributor
Imagine this: in a world much like our own, a problem in the markets prompted a Congressional hearing that led to quick action by a major player in the financial markets. The fix worked immediately and prevented further trouble. No year-long studies MOREJun 30, 2010 4:28 PM ET
There will never be another flash crash -- at least, not quite like the one last month.
That's the hope of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which said Thursday it will institute circuit breakers that will halt trading in individual stocks after they fall 10% in five minutes.
The move comes in the wake of the May 6 fiasco in which the shares of some companies, notably Accenture (ACN), fell from $40 MOREColin Barr - Jun 10, 2010 12:57 PM ET
Waddell & Reed says it was just hedging against falling stock values when the market went haywire last week.
Waddell & Reed (WDR) was fingered Friday by Reuters as a big seller of futures contracts during last Thursday's so-called flash crash. Regulators said this week they had identified a trader whose sales accounted for 9% of marketwide volume during a 20-minute market disruption, and Reuters reports that an internal exchange document shows Waddell was MOREColin Barr - May 14, 2010 3:31 PM ET
|China and Fed fallout to weigh on stocks|
|Japan stocks plunge on weak China data|
|Tesla repays federal loan nearly 10 years early|
|China factory activity contracts in May|
|How police can find your deleted text messages|