FORTUNE -- The working-class California suburb of Richmond is taking matters into its own hands with a bold plan to rescue homeowners from foreclosure where banks and lenders have been slow or unwilling to step in. This is essentially the bailout Main Street never got, and Wall Street is now moving to block it.
On Wednesday, banks representing the nation's largest bond investors sued the city of Richmond, which last week became the first city to adopt a novel plan to take over underwater mortgages through the eminent domain process. Governments typically use eminent domain to forcibly seize land to turn around blighted areas. In Richmond, where roughly half of all homeowners with mortgages are underwater, officials plan to use eminent domain to seize home mortgages from investors at a price potentially below the property's current market value. The city would then reduce the loan balance and refinance those mortgages so that borrowers would end up paying less every month.
Needless to say, investors aren't thrilled. And the lawsuit against Richmond also isn't surprising, given that the powers of eminent domain have been hotly contested in U.S. courts over the past decade. What's ironic, however, and perhaps even hypocritical, is that Wall Street is fighting the kind of financial rescue it received just five years ago.
Recall that in 2008, amid the height of the financial crisis, Congress created the Troubled Asset Relief Program, a $700 billion package that essentially saved insurer American International Group (AIG), mortgage financiers Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, as well as auto industry giants General Motors (GM) and Chrysler. However reluctantly Wall Street accepted the help, America's biggest banks received $125 billion of that pile of rescue cash.
All were lucky enough to get bailouts amid the dark days of the financial crisis, unlike the millions of U.S. homeowners who lost their homes to foreclosure. To be sure, the bailouts came with strings attached; companies were required to repay the government, which some have done in full, while others are still doing so.
Richmond could include a similar repayment agreement, which may ease investors' worries about losses. Such an approach, which has the support of Harvard economist Kenneth Rogoff and others, could also soften concerns that if Richmond moves ahead with its plan, and if other communities follow, the risks of lending to those areas could rise and lenders would demand higher down payments and interest rates.
The lawsuit against Richmond was filed by three mortgage-bond trustees, units of Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC), and Deutsche Bank (DB), which, according to the Wall Street Journal, were directed to act by a group of investors, including BlackRock Inc. (BLK), Pacific Investment Management Co., as well as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They argue Richmond's use of eminent domain would benefit only a small group of citizens at a loss for out-of-state investors and therefore violates laws governing interstate commerce. More than that, the lawsuit argues, seizure of loans doesn't benefit the public good.
Investors may or may not be right, but it's hard to blame cities that have for years urged banks and lenders to give homeowners a break. The lawsuit is clearly a trial balloon for others cities that might follow suit, but it also offers a chance for Wall Street to work a little harder with troubled borrowers.
Richmond, California is saving local underwater mortgage holders from the banks. Where was this solution four years ago?
FORTUNE – In the wake of the financial crisis in 2008, it seemed like everyone from Wall Street to America's auto industry got a bailout; the government swooped in to rescue companies from Bank of America (BAC) to General Motors (GM) and American International Group (AIG).
And as home prices collapsed, Uncle Sam tried MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Jul 31, 2013 10:41 AM ET
Hedge funds are scooping up personal property tax liens from municipalities at a quick pace after big banks decided it was too risky.
By Lynnley Browning
FORTUNE -- Hedge fund executives who descended on Miami last month for a conference on unpaid property taxes were treated to waterfront cruises of estates owned by Madonna, Shaquille O'Neal, and Elizabeth Taylor. But unlike those celebrity residences, the houses the profit-chasing investors were hunting MOREMay 1, 2013 11:47 AM ET
How did New York and New Jersey jump to the top of the foreclosure list, behind only Florida? Red tape.
FORTUNE – Just as most of us believe we've seen the worst of the housing market's collapse, two unlikely states are only now getting hit with a wave of foreclosures: New York and New Jersey.
The region was largely spared when home prices disastrously tumbled in 2007. New York and New Jersey, MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Apr 15, 2013 6:00 AM ET
As Fortune predicted last year, a robust recovery in home prices is under way.
FORTUNE -- In spring 2011 this writer penned a controversial cover story titled "The Return of Real Estate" that predicted a strong rebound in housing. At the time, prices and sales were still tumbling, and the prevailing view among economists and pundits was that the slide would drag on and on. But Fortune's contrarian forecast proved right. MOREShawn Tully, senior editor-at-large - Oct 18, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Monitor says he has gotten over 1,000 complaints.
FORTUNE --The borrower bailout remains on hold.
In the last few months, there has been more and more indications that banks, investors and regulators would finally embrace loan modifications that reduce how much borrowers owe. It hasn't happened yet. Edward DeMarco, who is the head of the government agency that oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, says he is still against so-called principal reductions.
And MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Aug 2, 2012 6:00 AM ET
The banks spend a lot of time carping about economic uncertainty. But they have no one but themselves to blame for the latest pratfall at Ally Financial.
Ally, the car lender formerly known as GMAC that was rescued after a disastrous spin down subprime lending lane, had been hoping to do an initial public offering this month but is now more likely looking at the fall, the Financial Times reported.
The firm has MOREColin Barr - Jun 10, 2011 11:49 AM ET
Many judges presiding over the countless foreclosure cases around the country are taking steps to stop fraud, but in a few key courts, the bench takes the opposite track.
By Abigail Field, contributor
FORTUNE -- Since last fall, the judicial system has been confronting foreclosure fraud across the country. As the scale of the problem became publicized, it's been increasingly hard for judges not to notice that the banks have consistently filed MOREApr 18, 2011 1:21 PM ET
Think Washington is going soft on the banks again? You have company – at the FDIC, no less.
The three primary federal bank regulators – the Federal Reserve, the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency – issued enforcement actions Wednesday that order the biggest U.S. banks to clean up their foreclosure mills.
The move, affecting 14 institutions and promising fines at some undetermined point down MOREColin Barr - Apr 13, 2011 3:48 PM ET
Regulators charged the biggest U.S. banks with "unsafe and unsound practices" on foreclosures, and ordered a sweeping overhaul of their mortgage operations.
The move is the strongest federal response so far to the bankers' massive, greed-driven misconduct during the crisis of the past half-decade. It comes after a months-long federal review of the banks' handling of mortgage paperwork and foreclosure actions.
But in a telling omission, the regulators didn't say how big the fines they will assess might be MOREColin Barr - Apr 13, 2011 2:01 PM ET
|The medical marijuana ad that never aired, despite contrary media headlines|
|2 million students missing out on college aid|
|Boeing reports wing cracks on Dreamliners|
|The bull market at 5: Not old yet|
|China to fight pollution with drones|