It's taken almost five years, but one of the government's ugliest ducklings is finally showing signs of turning into a swan. A profitable swan, at that. I'm talking about Ally Financial, formerly GMAC, General Motors' finance subsidiary.
Ally sucked up $17.2 billion of federal bailout money, much of which ended up being used to fill the rat hole known as Residential Capital (which we'll call ResCap from here on). ResCap, once one of the nation's largest mortgage companies, was Ally's golden asset during the housing boom. Alas, it turned to dross when the housing bubble popped. Ally finally put it into bankruptcy last year.
It's been a messy, contentious proceeding. But now it appears to be nearing an end, and Ally's additional ResCap obligations seem to finally have a cap on them. That makes it possible to estimate what the government's Ally investment is worth. Guess what? By my conservative math, that stake is worth $1.5 billion more than it cost. And I'm not including the $6.1 billion of dividends the government has collected from Ally. Taxpayers coming out ahead on a company that spent $8.3 billion, all of it lost, to keep ResCap afloat? That has committed another $2.3 billion to settle its ResCap liabilities? Yes, it's true.
Given that there's no public market for Ally shares, how can I calculate that the government is ahead? By digging through a bunch of financial filings, and applying a little common sense. You can find the full version here. To give you the not-so-short version, I adjusted Ally's stated net worth for the money it has set aside to pay ResCap's creditors and regulators. Then I divided that net worth by the Ally shares outstanding. I took the per share "book value" and multiplied it by the number of Ally shares the Treasury owns. I added the value of the Treasury's Ally preferred stock and adjusted for a 2011 transaction in which Treasury sold part of its Ally holdings. Bottom line: The stake is worth about $16 billion; Treasury's cost is about $14.5 billion.
Yes, I realize that even when you include the hefty dividend payments, you're looking at a relatively modest profit for taxpayers, given the riskiness of the government's investment. But the Treasury saved Ally from bankruptcy so that it could keep financing GM's car dealers, allowing both the dealers and GM (GM) to avoid collapse. For taxpayers to come out ahead on this is an unexpected bonus.
How could it have possibly happened? "Ally's auto finance business has performed very well, and its international operations have been sold for excellent prices," says Tim Massad, the Treasury's assistant secretary for financial stability, who adds that the company has substantially strengthened its Ally Bank subsidiary.
In addition, Ally's liability in the ResCap bankruptcy was less than I originally expected, because Ally set up the bankruptcy well and ResCap's assets were liquidated at excellent prices. Those prices are largely attributable to the fine job ResCap's management did keeping the company from collapsing into chaos after it went into bankruptcy.
Timing, as they say, is everything. The Treasury bought into Ally during a panic, when assets were so cheap that the Treasury could make out even though ResCap turned into a hideous nightmare. By contrast, Cerberus Capital and its private equity investors are down almost 75% on their $8.15 billion Ally investment. Cerberus spent $7.4 billion buying 51% of Ally from GM in 2006, when ResCap was rocking, and invested $750 million alongside the Treasury. Current value: $2.2 billion.
Now, a caveat or three. The ResCap bankruptcy settlement could unravel. Ally could run into unexpected problems. Its stock could fetch less than its asset value per share, the number I'm using. My bet, though, is that taxpayers will end up ahead on Ally. Isn't it nice to get a pleasant surprise from the government for a change?
This story is from the July 22, 2013 issue of Fortune.
FORTUNE -- Here's how I calculated the value of the Treasury's stake in Ally Financial, formerly GMAC, General Motors' finance subsidiary. And how I calculated the value of the stake held by Cerberus Capital and its present (and possibly former) investors.
In late May, shortly after a tentative settlement of the bankruptcy of Ally's Residential Capital subsidiary, Ally announced that it was taking a $1.55 billion charge for expenses connected with MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Jul 2, 2013 5:00 AM ET
When the government offered GMAC's old shareholders a free ride, how could they turn it down?
You would think, at this point, that there would be nothing left to be outraged about when it comes to government bailouts. But the more bailout rocks you turn over, the more well-connected players you find who aren't being forced to pay the full price of their mistakes. One of the little-noticed rocks I've MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Jan 19, 2011 5:00 AM ET
The government restructured its majority ownership of Ally Bank in a deal that aims to speed its exit from the $17 billion bailout of the former GMAC.
Treasury will boost its common stock stake in Ally to 74% from 56% under the deal outlined Thursday afternoon. Under the arrangement, Treasury will convert $5.5 billion of preferred stock to common shares.
The government emphasized that the deal will "accelerate Treasury's ability to exit its investment MOREColin Barr - Dec 30, 2010 4:48 PM ET
The companies that helped create the financial meltdown that touched off the Great Recession have found yet another way to undermine the public's faith in capitalism: the foreclosure fiasco.
The biggest danger to the U.S. capitalist system doesn't come from communists or community activists or left-wing academics. It comes from some of the nation's biggest financial institutions. These companies, which helped create the financial meltdown that MOREOct 26, 2010 10:16 AM ET
Taking on too much risk got the banks in trouble. So why are Bank of America and GMAC taking on more by resuming foreclosures?
Earlier this week, Bank of America (BAC) and Ally Financial's GMAC mortgage unit announced they would resume foreclosures in many states, even while government investigations into foreclosure procedures ramp up.
Their timing was curious -- both banks went back in on the same day? But what's really remarkable MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Oct 20, 2010 1:28 PM ET
Bank of America has outdone itself yet again.
The irresponsible foreclosure practices of banks have been in the headlines. Employees of both GMAC and JPMorgan Chase (JPM) have admitted to signing off on foreclosure documents without actually having read them. The reports have led to renewed questions about the banks' foreclosure practices.
But as usual, the no holds barred winner in the irresponsible bank tricks department is BofA (BAC).
The bank recently foreclosed MOREColin Barr - Sep 23, 2010 11:12 AM ET
|Instagram launches direct messaging|
|Military retirees: You betrayed us, Congress|
|I work 4 jobs and I'm still struggling|
|Foxconn improves worker conditions, but hours still excessive - report|
|Will the market actually cheer Fed tapering?|