FORTUNE -- At first glance, you would think that the CEOs of taxophobic U.S. corporations and our less-than-stellar leaders in Washington have nothing in common. But you'd be wrong. What they share is a lack of shame and an excess of narrow thinking.
The similarity between C-suite tax avoiders and Washington reality avoiders struck me as I watched the debt-ceiling and government-shutdown debacle unfold. Listening to politicians say "This is what voters in my district want" reminded me of watching Apple (AAPL) chief executive Tim Cook invoke "shareholder value" during his May testimony at a Senate hearing that focused on the extraordinary games that Apple plays to avoid paying U.S. taxes on what anyone other than a tax lawyer would consider U.S. income. Not only was Cook not visibly embarrassed, but he actually seemed proud of what the company was doing.
Pols and CEOs both justify their actions by citing obligations to their narrow constituencies. The fact that all Americans, conservative and liberal alike, would realize long-term benefits from having a functional government with predictable finances? The fact that shareholders would ultimately realize serious value from an increase in our nation's well-being if bigtime corporate tax avoiders decided they had an obligation to help pay for public education and infrastructure? Well, that's when people trot out the John Maynard Keynes line, "In the long run, we are all dead."
Look, it's easy to understand why companies (perfectly legally) avoid taxes. Lower taxes mean higher profits, which presumably translate into higher stock prices. However, going to extraordinary lengths to avoid taxes helps undermine companies' long-term interests by hurting society and by giving average people yet another reason to detest Big Business.
It's also easy to understand why politicians would rather pander to their constituents than act in the national interest. It's safer. If you're a Tea Party type who compromises or a liberal who tells Social Security recipients that the program in its current form is unsustainable, you risk losing your job.
I have a belief, possibly naive, that when you're entrusted with corporate or political leadership, you're supposed to lead rather than stick your finger in the air, divine the prevailing wind, and follow it. But maybe that's just me.
However, I actually see a few glimmers of hope. Some of the fanatics who caused the government shutdown and fomented the debt-ceiling crisis are catching heat for having damaged conservatives' long-term interests. Which, in fact, they did. And I've even seen a company do the right thing because it was embarrassed. Not in the U.S., but in England, where an uproar erupted last year after a superb series by Reuters (see bottom of page) about the tax-avoidance games played by Starbucks (SBUX), which, Reuters reported, told shareholders it was making big profits in England but filed U.K. tax returns showing losses. My favorite part was Starbucks U.K. buying coffee beans from a Swiss affiliate that benefited from an agricultural tax break.
As a result of the blowback, Starbucks paid £10 million (about $16 million) of U.K. taxes voluntarily. Hello? What's going on? I asked Starbucks why it was voluntarily paying taxes. The answer, from Corey duBrowa, Starbucks' senior vice president for global communications: "We believe that acting responsibly makes good business sense, and the payment of corporate tax in the U.K. is a good example of this ethos in action."
Alas, two other U.S. companies harpooned by Reuters -- Google (GOOG) and Amazon (AMZN) -- felt no obligation to do anything. But Starbucks' deciding that it's good business to pay taxes is really encouraging. So is the intra-conservative debate between pragmatists and fanatics. Liberals may be next. If we get lucky, shame and political compromise may yet become trendy.
Reuters' 2012 special report
How Starbucks avoids UK taxes
Amazon's billion-dollar tax shield
Starbucks's European tax bill disappears down $100 million hole
How the UK tax authority got cozy with big business
EBay's double tax base prompts calls for investigation
Reuters' coverage of Google's tax strategy this year
This story is from the November 18, 2013 issue of Fortune.
Why Google decided to fund a bold new biotech platform.
FORTUNE -- Google (GOOG) last month made waves in the biotech world by announcing the formation of Calico, a "new company that will focus on health and well-being, in particular the challenge of aging and associated diseases." It would be led by ex-Genentech CEO Art Levinson – a bit of a surprising move given that Levinsohn effectively left the Google board several MOREDan Primack - Oct 9, 2013 10:43 AM ET
Luis Arbulu joins Samsung.
FORTUNE -- Luis Arbulu, a former Google business development and investment executive, has joined Samsung Electronics (SSNLF), Fortune has learned. He will be a Menlo Park-based director in Samsung's new Open Innovation Center, whose strategy includes making small early-stage investments into promising hardware and software startups.
Samsung launched the Open Innovation Center earlier this year, as a separate effort from its existing Samsung Ventures platform. In addition to MOREDan Primack - Sep 19, 2013 2:27 PM ET
Google acqui-hires San Francisco incubator.
FORTUNE -- Google has quietly "acqui-hired" most of the team at Hattery, a San Francisco-based digital innovation lab and venture capital firm founded by former Google (GOOG) employees Josh Mendelsohn, Joshua To and Luis Arbulu.
Mendelsohn tells me that the deal closed a couple of months ago, with most of Hattery's innovation lab staff now working within various Google departments. This includes Joshua To, while Luis Arbulu has joined MOREDan Primack - Sep 19, 2013 2:27 PM ET
We know we're all going to die someday. But we don't know much about how Google plans to stop it.
FORTUNE -- Yesterday's big tech story (beyond Apple's iOS7 release) was actually a biotech story, but only because Google (GOOG) was involved. The search giant announced that it has launched Calico, a "new company that will focus on health and well-being, in particular the challenge of aging and associated diseases."
Or, as MOREDan Primack - Sep 19, 2013 11:08 AM ET
Senior Google exec and private equity titan join Uber board of directors.
FORTUNE -- On-demand car service Uber is adding a pair of heavy hitters to its board of directors, in conjunction with a new $360 million fundraise led by Google Ventures and TPG Capital.
Fortune has learned from multiple sources that David Drummond, Google's (GOOG) chief legal officer and senior VP of corporate development, and TPG Capital co-founder David Bonderman have MOREDan Primack - Aug 22, 2013 11:29 PM ET
Ride-sharing company Uber nears large new funding round with some unexpected investors.
FORTUNE -- On-demand ride service Uber is in advanced talks to raise at least $150 million in a new round of funding from some unusual sources, Fortune has learned.
Private equity firm Texas Pacific Group is expected to lead the round after beating out several other bidders, in one of its very few deals that would not include majority ownership. MOREDan Primack - Jul 25, 2013 10:24 AM ET
Oracle, Google, and Amazon are just a few of the hundreds of large companies that have cut confidential deals with the IRS to help lower their tax bills, and critics want the agency to disclose the details of these complex pacts.
By Lynnley Browning
FORTUNE -- When Oracle reported its latest quarterly earnings last month, most investors focused on the fact that its dividend doubled. The number that got less notice MOREJul 22, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Google wants to partner with private equity on complicated deals. But there may be a better way.
FORTUNE -- Google Inc. may soon partner with private equity firms to acquire other companies, according to comments made yesterday by Google mergers and acquisitions chief Don Harrison.
But isn't there a better option? Like adding private equity veterans to Google's (GOOG) in-house corporate development team, like Yahoo (YHOO) has done?
Here was Harrison's explanation, as paraphrased by MOREDan Primack - Jun 19, 2013 12:45 PM ET
When venture capitalist John Malloy first invested in Waze, the company was worth just a few million dollars. Now Google is paying more than $1 billion for it. Malloy explains what he saw back in 2008, and why his bet paid off.
FORTUNE -- Google (GOOG) this week announced that it will buy social mapping company Waze for a reported $1.1 billion, beating out earlier suitors like Apple (AAPL) and Facebook MOREDan Primack - Jun 13, 2013 3:18 PM ET
|Military retirees: You betrayed us, Congress|
|I work 4 jobs and I'm still struggling|
|Instagram launches direct messaging|
|Stocks sink as disappointing December continues|
|Ford set for most aggressive expansion in 50 years|