FORTUNE -- Earlier this morning, there appeared to be two finalists for the Yahoo (YHOO) CEO job: Interim CEO Ross Levinsohn and Hulu boss Jason Kilar.
But now there is only one, as Hulu just issued the following statement:
"As has been reported, Jason Kilar has been a focus of the Yahoo CEO search committee. He has graciously declined to be considered."
First, let's leave aside the obvious silliness of someone declining to be considered. Pretty sure that's not really something you can decline. For example, I'm considering Albert Pujols for my company softball team. Come on Albert, try to stop me.
So what exactly does Hulu mean? Here are a few options:
1. Kilar just doesn't want the job. He's happy at Hulu. You know, the company that reportedly spurned Yahoo's $2 billion acquisition offer last year. At least he knows the business issues he faces, rather than diving into what many believe is a bottomless pool of despair.
2. Kilar wants the job but saw the writing on the wall. This is the face-saving option. Popular sentiment is that Levinsohn has done a good job since taking over for Scott Thompson, including today's news that Yahoo has settled its patent dispute with Facebook (FB). Moreover, he is the company's third CEO in the past 12 months. Can the rank-and-file really handle a fourth change in leadership? Maybe Kilar came to these realizations late, and is trying to make someone else's decision look like his own.
3. Kilar is still in the running. This is the double-secret recruitment theory. Kilar is still CEO of Hulu, and few companies do well upon hearing that their fearless leader is looking to switch teams. So he officially pulls out, but keeps back channels open. If he gets an offer from Yahoo, then he sheepishly tells the Hulu troops that he tried telling Yahoo no, but then received an offer that he couldn't refuse.
You got an alternate theory?
Sign up for Dan's daily email newsletter on deals and deal-makers: GetTermSheet.com
* Erick Schonfeld: Why Hulu couldn't find a buyer
* Annie Lowery: Little banks vs. big banks
* The FT effect: When the pink paper talks, traders go wild
* Uh oh: Are Groupon and LivingSocial inflating their "discounts?"
* Morning Call: U.S. futures point higher, London rises early, European shares climb and the Nikkei slumps.
* Done deal: Microsoft now owns Skype
* Social legacy: People are leaving Facebook passwords in their wills
* Today in sovereign MOREDan Primack - Oct 14, 2011 6:49 AM ET
Forget the consumer backlash. Reed Hastings deserves accolades for taking Netflix into the future even if it ruffles feathers.
FORTUNE -- Reed Hastings is a visionary. Let's just get that on the table up front. It's been said before -- Fortune named the Netflix CEO the Businessperson of the Year in 2010, painting a portrait of a man who has made a habit of taking big risks that have paid off time and MOREDuff McDonald, Contributing Editor - Jul 14, 2011 11:24 AM ET
|McDonald's gives Charles Ramsey free food for a year|
|Where your donation dollars go|
|Hedge fund guru says moms and trading don't mix|
|Doomsday investors betting on market crash|
|The 'chicken poop' credit and other bad tax breaks|