By Jennifer Reingold, senior editor
FORTUNE -- The Robin Hood Foundation -- Wall Street's favorite charity -- was named, rather cheekily, for the lovable fictional character who stole from the rich to give to the poor. But with this week's news that Robin Hood board member Steven A. Cohen will pay a record $1.2 billion in fines due to insider trading at his 100%-owned firm SAC Capital Advisors, life is suddenly imitating reality in a rather uncomfortable way.
According to the plea, it turns out SAC did indeed steal from the rich by insider trading, gaining an unfair edge over other investors. Indirectly, it redistributed some of those gains to the poor, via the $256 million given away by the Steven A. and Alexandra M. Cohen Foundation over the last decade to the likes of Stamford Hospital, North Shore-LIJ Health System, NYU Medical Center, and, of course, the Robin Hood Foundation, to which Cohen has donated more than $80 million.
It's an awkward situation, to be sure -- accepting funds for good causes that may have come, in part, from ill-gotten gains is a moral dilemma at best. So what happens now? Does Cohen stay on his boards and continue to give away money -- which, despite its origins, can still help people? Does he step down and stop donating to avoid tainting these organizations with guilt by association with his firm? Or does he actually amp up his giving, much as Michael Milken -- who, unlike Cohen, was personally convicted of a felony -- did a few decades back in an effort to improve his image? So far, it sounds like option three; Cohen, in a statement, said: "The Cohens expect to continue to increase their charitable giving in future years, as they have over the past decade." A spokesperson for the Robin Hood Foundation told Fortune that "Steve Cohen is a valued and thoughtful member of Robin Hood's board, and his leadership and generosity over the past nine years has benefited countless New Yorkers in need. We are not asking him to step down, and we have no reason to believe that he will."
That could be good news for Cohen's biggest beneficiaries -- several of which, such as Brown University, where Cohen sits on the board of Trustees, and L.A.'s Museum of Contemporary Art, where Cohen is also a director -- didn't respond to requests for comment. Of those who did respond, none of them see a donor whose firm (not the individual himself) has pleaded guilty to a serious crime as embarrassing enough to warrant giving the money back or even changing the names on the entrance to a building.
Says Christopher Riendeau, senior vice president of fund development at Stanford Hospital, which has received millions from the Cohens and is now building a pediatric care center to be named after them: "We stand by their philanthropy. They've been extremely generous to this community." At New York University, which in February announced a $17 million gift from the Foundation to create a new research center for veterans' mental health issues, "we will be keeping the gift," says spokeswoman Lisa Greiner, and the name (the Cohen Veterans Center) will not change.
This is not the first time that a rich man with philanthropic leanings has ended up in legal hot water, of course. It takes only one visit to, say, the (Michael) Milken Institute or Gould Memorial Library (funded from the profits of 19th century robber baron Jay Gould) to remember that many of the country's most important cultural institutions were founded by businessmen with ethical or legal challenges.
Maybe that's why you don't see charity clawbacks like you do with bonuses these days; when it comes to philanthropy, at least someone wins.
Additional reporting by Marty Jones
A longstanding anomaly in American law gives federal prosecutors enormous power in deciding whether to punish a large corporation for the actions of even a single employee.
By Roger Parloff, senior editor
FORTUNE -- Hedge fund powerhouse SAC Capital Advisors, indicted Thursday for wire and securities fraud violations after six of its employees pleaded guilty to those charges, appears to have close to no legal defense to the charges it faces.
That's MOREJul 26, 2013 2:08 PM ET
Criminal charges against hedge fund are a backdoor way to end Steve Cohen's career.
FORTUNE -- When criminal charges were filed Thursday against the hedge fund SAC Capital, Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, held a press conference to announce the fruits of a years-long government investigation.
"SAC became, over time, a veritable magnet for market cheaters," Bharara told reporters. "That's why the institution, and MOREKatie Benner - Jul 26, 2013 7:01 AM ET
With evidence this solid, it's fair to ask once again whether Wall Street regulators are being too tepid.Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Jul 25, 2013 3:09 PM ET
SEC files civil case against hedge fund titan.
FORTUNE -- Apparently teflon sometimes can melt in the heat.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed civil charges against hedge fund titan Steve Cohen, alleging that he failed to "reasonably supervise" two employees at his SAC Capital. The pair -- Mathew Martoma and Michael Steinberg -- both had been previously charged with insider trading.
"Hedge fund managers are responsible for exercising appropriate supervision over their employees MOREDan Primack - Jul 19, 2013 2:47 PM ET
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman must explain why a 5-minute advantage for ordinary Thomson Reuters subscribers to access market-moving data is fine, while a 5-minute, 2-second one for premium subscribers is not.
By Roger Parloff
FORTUNE -- The fuzzy interface between our exception-ridden insider-trading laws, aggressive hedge funds, and resource-starved universities and journalism companies were all on stark display Monday when New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and Thomson MOREJul 11, 2013 9:20 AM ET
Public pension official accused of profiting from tech merger.
FORTUNE -- John Johnson, the chief investment officer for the $6.5 billion Wyoming Retirement System, today was charged by the Securities & Exchange Commission with participating in a $29 million insider trading scheme. Two other men also were charged by the SEC, in a plot related to the 2008 acquisition of Foundry Networks by Brocade Communications (BRCD).
At the time, Johnson was between MOREDan Primack - Mar 26, 2013 2:53 PM ET
Why did Best Buy stock jump before new takeover news?
FORTUNE -- Best Buy (BBY) stock yesterday opened trading at $11.95 per share. Then it ping-ponged higher throughout the day, before closing 1.92% higher $12.18. Decent day, but nothing too notable. Then came the aftermarket, in which Best Buy shares spiked all the way up to $12.85 at around 5pm.
It wasn't until several hours later that The Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported that Best Buy MOREDan Primack - Dec 13, 2012 10:14 AM ET
* Jesse Eisinger: The insider trading enablers
* Chained CPI: The sneaky idea that could end the fiscal cliff
* When VCs run out of energy: The new era of cleantech investing
* Morning Call: U.S. futures point lower, European shares fall and the Nikkei climbs.
* Om Malik: What Twitter must ask itself
* IPO: SolarCity's sunspot
* Jesse Drucker: Google's Bermuda tax shelter
* Oliver Burkeman: Why retailers make you suffer
* Midtown nexus: Mapping New York City's private MOREDan Primack - Dec 13, 2012 6:51 AM ET
Forcing executives to schedule their trades well in advance won't stop them from taking advantage of bad news.
Correction: 11/30, 3:00 PM.
FORTUNE -- When it comes to insider trading and executives, the market has always responded with a wink and a nod. By definition, every time an executive buys or sells a stock it's insider trading. Do CEOs have information that no one else has about their company? You betcha. Do MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Nov 29, 2012 1:32 PM ET
|Homeless college students seek shelter during breaks|
|Five things you didn't know about Bernie Madoff's epic scam|
|Budget deal hits federal workers|
|Snowden docs had NYTimes exec fearing for his life|
|Don't fight it. Bitcoin has a bright future|