FORTUNE -- U.S. insurers have helped discourage smoking and have even made driving safer, but can the industry also make America a less violent place?
It's a tall order that would ask insurers to change the way they do business, but a handful of state lawmakers think so. Since December's tragic shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., state lawmakers have turned to liability insurance as an economic way to ease the horrendous problems of guns and violence. This month, California proposed a law that would require gun owners to buy liability insurance, which would cover damages or injuries caused by their weapons. The state joins Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and New York, which have proposed similar bills.
Until this week, the insurance industry had been pretty mum about the proposals. The American Insurance Association, a property-casualty trade group that represent about 300 insurers, said on Tuesday that requiring gun owners to purchase liability insurance would do more harm than good.
"Even if insurance could be written for gun crimes, it could have the opposite of its intended effect," the group said in a statement released Tuesday. Such laws could lead to recklessness by gun owners who have little to lose in the way of income, assets or property.
Insurers clearly resist the idea. And in a way, it speaks to the severity of America's problems with guns. It will be worth watching whether public pressures over the gun debate will force the industry to change the way it writes policies. Even if the laws pass, insurance companies aren't obligated to offer that type of coverage, opponents from the industry say.
What's behind the push for liability insurance is to make it more costly and therefore harder for people to own guns. That might very well happen, but it might do less to ease any fears of another Sandy Hook. The shooting was a deliberate act of violence, not an accident. U.S. insurers typically compensate accidents, but the industry generally doesn't cover intentional acts, says Robert Hartwig, president and economist at the Insurance Information Institute.
"None of the [proposed] legislation out there makes that distinction," Hartwig says.
Nonetheless, insurance would be a good idea to compensate victims of gun accidents. Say on a hunting trip a gun accidentally goes off, similar to the freak accident involving former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney in 2006. Likewise, if a gun accidentally fires off at a private home, the liability part of a homeowner's insurance policy would compensate the victim.
The reality is that the bulk of deaths from guns is not entirely accidental. In 2010, nearly 20,000 of the 30,000 deaths from guns in the U.S. were suicides, according to the latest figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And so, as opponents of liability insurance argue, it's hard to see whom the insurance would pay out.
Nonetheless, economists have come up with the price of owning a gun, as University of Michigan economics professor Justin Wolfers recently noted to NPR . It's not just the actual cost of buying the weapon, but there's also what economists call "social costs" -- the price of grief and loss that might follow if the gun were used to take the lives of innocent people. This could run anywhere between $100 and $1,800 per year for a gun-owning household, Wolfer writes, citing a 2005 study.
Liability insurance might compensate for such costs, but it's also hard not to wonder if the most violent criminals that own guns would even register their weapons anyway, much less buy liability insurance because the law says so.
Regardless, liability insurance could reduce accidents -- owners who store their weapons safely would pay less for insurance, as Massachusetts State Rep. David Linsky said when he introduced a bill in January to fine or jail anyone found in possession of a gun without insurance.
As Wolfer suggests, liability insurance might have made a difference in the Sandy Hook shootings.
"It's the sort of careful solution that would enable people who enjoy hunting to continue with their passions but also push them to take the sorts of precautions that we all wish the Lanza household had taken," he writes.
Could insurers eventually agree?
AIG's former subsidiary, AIA, helped save the company. Now it could be a competitor.
By Neel Chowdhury, contributor
FORTUNE -- Insurance giant AIG has always enjoyed a special relationship with AIA, its former Asian subsidiary. After all, AIG was founded in Shanghai in 1919 by C.V. Starr, an adventurous Californian who pioneered life insurance in Asia. AIG (AIG) left China in 1950, one year after Mao's communist takeover, but AIA remained MOREJan 9, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Even the best plan can be drained dry by getting sick. Here's how to protect yourself with disability insurance.
By Janice Revell, contributor
FORTUNE – Let's say you're a diligent retirement planner, the type who maxes out his 401(k) and IRA. Odds are, however, that you devote little thought to protecting the value of your human capital -- that is, your ability to earn and save money. Ignore it at MOREJun 26, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Call this the year of catastrophes – and not just the financial kind that the guys in Washington and Brussels seem resolved to lead us into.
Halfway through, this year is already the costliest on record for natural catastrophes, insurer Munich Re said Tuesday in its first-half review. Losses hit $265 billion in the first six months of 2011 – which exceeds the $220 billion in losses in the biggest previous MOREColin Barr - Jul 12, 2011 11:23 AM ET
Investors roasting Aflac may be about to get plucked themselves.
Shares in Aflac (AFL), the life and health insurer that does three-quarters of its business in Japan, tumbled 7% Tuesday. The Columbus, Ga., company has lost more than $3 billion of market value since Japan was hit Friday by a 9.0-magnitude earthquake and tsunami.
The latest slide in Aflac shares comes amid fears that nuclear reactors hit by the tsunami will melt MOREColin Barr - Mar 15, 2011 2:44 PM ET
So much for Black Monday.
Bank of America (BAC) shares dropped less than 1% Monday after a heavily hyped document dump turned up few documents and a lot of chin music.
The emails released Monday morning at bankofamericasuck.com supposedly show employees at an insurance unit of BofA's Countrywide tried to hide foreclosure data from the government, by stripping some documents of identifying numbers. Bank of America told Reuters the documents were stolen MOREColin Barr - Mar 14, 2011 10:44 AM ET
If you are alive, you will not have your life insurance to spend; if you have it to spend, you aren't alive. This is a dilemma that only an investment banker can solve.
By Moshe Silver, Hedgeye
The baby boomers represent a great marketing opportunity – and hence a tremendous investment opportunity. One could have become very rich over the past six decades – and very predictably so – by investing successively MOREFeb 14, 2011 12:17 PM ET
Regulators plan to spend the next 17 years fattening up the federal deposit insurance fund.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. proposed rules Tuesday that eventually will nearly double the normal size of the taxpayer-backed fund that stands behind insured bank deposits, while gradually reducing the rates banks pay for insurance coverage.
As part of the plan, the FDIC rescinded a rate increase it had planned for Jan. 1, in the MOREColin Barr - Oct 19, 2010 3:19 PM ET
A rapidly aging population and the government's deepening financial struggles make Japan a potential powder keg for international investments.
By Darius Dale, analyst, Hedgeye
We try to avoid hyperbole as much as possible at Hedgeye, the research firm where I work as an analyst. But after researching Japanese demographics and pension obligations, we have to say that in our opinion, they present one of the most dangerous potential risks to global investing MORESep 27, 2010 3:00 AM ET
Ambac tumbled 24% after the bond insurer said it is pursuing a prepackaged bankruptcy filing.
The New York-based company lost $58 million in the latest quarter, which doesn't look too bad compared to its year-ago loss of $2.4 billion. Ambac (ABK) also said the statutory surplus at its Ambac Assurance unit surged to $1.5 billion from $160 million in March, following an agreement this spring to settle some insurance contracts covering bubble-era MOREColin Barr - Aug 10, 2010 10:23 AM ET
|Stocks finish higher for fourth straight week|
|Prison exclusive: Bernie Madoff can't sleep|
|Oil-price manipulation: the next Libor?|
|Google says you'll know when Glass is sketchy|