By Paul Hodgson
FORTUNE -- In January, news stories claimed that JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon got a 74% pay increase in 2013. But in April, now that the proxy is out, his pay is reported as declining by 37%.
One thing is certain, it can't have done both. The surprising fact is that neither figure represents what Dimon actually earned in either year. In 2012, Dimon earned $9,506,114 while last year he earned $12,033,071, figures that have not been reported elsewhere. That's a 27% increase in a year when the bank saw some of the largest fines ever handed out to a financial institution. In this case, it's not so much performance-related pay as fine-related pay.
The confusion arises from the different ways of measuring CEO pay. There is the pay figure reported in the headline "summary compensation table" in the proxy statement. Let's call that "headline pay." It consists of salary, bonus, estimated value of stock and stock options granted in the year, benefits, and perquisites.
Then there's "realized pay." This consists of salary, bonus, actual value of stock vested in the year, actual profits on stock options exercised during the year, benefits, and perks. It's roughly equivalent to what some companies, such as GE, are reporting as W-2 pay. The big difference is in the stock valuation, and it can make a very substantial difference in the pay amounts being reported.
Headline pay is a reflection of what the board thinks of performance right now. Realized pay is a reflection of actual performance over anything up to the last 10 years. For example, part of Dimon's 2012 pay was more than $4 million from options due to expire that year -- in other words, options that he had held on to for 10 years.
This confusion is the same for most of the other bank CEOs. For example, Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman was reported as having received an increase of around 45%; Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs, was said to have seen a rise of around 10%; and Citigroup (C) CEO Michael Corbat a rise of around 42%. In fact, the increase in Corbat's realized pay in 2013 was only 25% -- less than the headline increase, though still substantial. Blankfein's realized pay went up by only 4%, while Gorman's actually declined by 15%.
But these two figures are not the only source of confusion about CEO pay. The banks, being banks, have come up with another source of confusion, which they conveniently blame on SEC disclosure regulations. Dimon's 74% increase is a perfect example -- this was due to an $18.5 million stock award for performance during 2013. But because JPMorgan (JPM) made the award in 2014, the SEC's disclosure regulations require such awards to be reported as 2014 compensation. This is a complete reversal of the way cash bonuses -- also often settled in the following year -- are treated, so this is partly the SEC's fault as well.
It's the same at Goldman Sachs (GS). Lloyd Blankfein saw a realized pay increase of only 4%, but a headline pay increase of almost 50% from 2012 to 2013, based on an $11.3 million stock award for 2012's performance and included in 2013's pay figure, not the $14.7 million for 2013. If we make the headline pay consistent, cash bonus and stock award reflecting that year's performance, changing reported pay in 2012 and 2013, the headline increase drops to 20%. Similarly for Morgan Stanley (MS), its version of Gorman's pay in 2013 is reported as $18 million, up 71%, while the summary compensation table has $14 million, up 32% from 2012, while his realized pay fell 15% to $7.4 million.
Finally at Citigroup, the CEO's headline pay of $17.6 million includes the estimated value of around $8 million for stock awards that include conditional performance shares, deferred shares, and a couple of other awards that were awarded by the compensation committee based on 2012 performance. In contrast, his realized pay of $11.7 million contains only $2 million worth of vested stock that represents the deferred into equity portion of annual bonuses over several years. Confusingly, the equity bonus actually for 2013 performance was also around $8 million.
Confused yet? I know I am. And to make things worse, all these equity awards based on either 2012 or 2013 performance are estimates of future value. Neither shareholders, nor the board, know what they might be worth when they actually vest. On the other hand, the realized pay amounts are set in stone, and reportable to the IRS on a W-2. I know which figure I trust the most.
James Gorman gets $18 million in 2013 pay and long-term compensation.
FORTUNE -- Last year was a good one for Morgan Stanley's CEO James Gorman. On Friday, we got more confirmation of that.
According to a financial filing, Morgan Stanley (MS) paid Gorman $12 million for his work in 2013. That was double what the CEO got the year before. In addition to his 2013 compensation, Morgan Stanley also said Gorman was MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Mar 28, 2014 5:02 PM ET
During a quarter in which rival Goldman struggled, Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman made progress on a turnaround strategy.
FORTUNE -- James Gorman's Morgan Stanley makeover is finally showing results.
Despite a tough three months for Wall Street traders, Morgan Stanley's profits and revenue, driven by growth in its wealth management division, beat expectations for the third quarter. The bank earned $906 million, up from a loss of just over $1 billion MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Oct 18, 2013 10:57 AM ET
CEO James Gorman has defied predictions that he would be forced out of the firm and has nearly pulled off an amazing turnaround.
FORTUNE -- Nearly a year ago, James Gorman sat in a chair on his firm's trading floor, clipped on a microphone and stared into a camera. For Morgan Stanley's CEO, it was Facebook judgment day.
Next to him was CNBC's Maria Bartiromo. Gorman had agreed to the interview weeks before, MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - May 17, 2013 11:05 AM ET
James Gorman gets the lowest pay of the 2012 Wall Street CEO packages revealed so far, making less than a third of what Goldman's Lloyd Blankfein makes.
FORTUNE - Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman is now a $6 million man. On Wall Street, that size check ain't considered bionic.
According to people familiar with the firm's plans, Morgan Stanley's board decided to cut Gorman's total compensation for 2012 by 30% from the MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 24, 2013 5:50 PM ET
James Gorman says 'Too Big to Fail' isn't a problem in the U.S.
FORTUNE -- When it comes to banking, Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman predicts the U.S. will go the way of Canada or France. Hopefully, more Canada than France.
Gorman, speaking at an industry conference Thursday morning, said he believes there will be many more deals for banks and other financial firms in the next few years. He said that MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Nov 30, 2012 9:08 AM ET
In the past few years, Morgan Stanley has leveraged its investment bank more and more toward technology IPOs. Now its reputation in that area is in trouble.
FORTUNE -- Add Facebook to Morgan Stanley's growing list of woes. The company's stock was falling even before last week's bungled IPO, and is now down 21% in the past month. Despite Morgan Stanley's (MS) recent disclosures showing it has lowered its exposure to MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - May 23, 2012 6:00 AM ET
Morgan Stanley (MS) chief executive James Gorman isn't worried about banks playing "both sides" of transactions, according to comments made this morning in an interview with Fortune managing editor Andy Serwer.
The issue has gained renewed attention in recent weeks, after a Delaware judge criticized Goldman Sachs (GS) for playing multiple roles in Kinder Morgan's (KMI) proposed $21.1 billion acquisition of El Paso Corporation (EP). Morgan Stanley also advised El Paso MOREDan Primack - Mar 16, 2012 11:27 AM ET
Despite negative press, Morgan Stanley CEO says Wall Street is still attractive, and that bank stocks will outperform the market in the next few years.
FORTUNE --Apparently, getting a bonus check for $125,000 isn't as disheartening as it may seem to some on Wall Street.
Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman, speaking at a Fortune breakfast series, said his firm has lost only two high-level employees since capping year-end cash bonuses for 2011 MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Mar 16, 2012 11:09 AM ET
|GM's recalled Cobalt was a failure from the start|
|Michaels hack hit 3 million|
|Why you should pay off your car loan ASAP|
|Walmart offers cheaper money wire service|
|Americans have fallen in love with real estate once again|