FORTUNE -- Warren Buffett's company appears to be looking to sell its entire stake in the company that used to own the Washington Post.
Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA) is the largest investor in Graham Holdings (GHC), which was renamed from The Washington Post Company last year after the company sold its namesake paper to Amazon (AMZN) CEO Jeff Bezos. Graham Holdings still owns the educational company Kaplan, as well as a number of television stations and news website pioneer Slate. Berkshire, through various entities, owns about $1.13 billion worth of Graham Holdings, or nearly a quarter of the company's shares, and has owned the stock in the company for more than four decades.
According to a late Wednesday filing on the SEC's website, Berkshire and Graham Holdings are negotiating a stock swap that would involve Berkshire handing its 1.7 million shares of Graham Holdings back to the company. In return, Buffett's company would get the Berkshire shares that Graham Holdings owns, currently held in part through the Graham Holdings pension plan.
But that wouldn't be the end of the deal. Berkshire holds considerably more Graham Holdings shares then Graham owns of Berkshire. According to the filing, Berkshire may end up acquiring a division of Graham Holdings to make up the difference. It does not appear from the filing that it has been determined what division of Graham Holdings Berkshire might be interested in.
While Graham Holdings might lose its largest shareholder, the deal could also be good for the family-led company. Graham has been buying back its own stock for many years. Acquiring the shares owned by Berkshire would allow Graham to pick up a big chuck of its own shares in one transaction at a set price. Also, the tax-free nature of the swap could make it advantageous for all parties.
The deal is not final and could still be called off if, for example, the prices of the companies' shares move on the news.
Berkshire has had a long history with Graham Holdings and its predecessor. Berkshire first bought shares of the company back in 1970s. He became a close confidant and personal friend to The Washington Post's long-time CEO Katharine Graham, who died in 2001. In the late 1970s, Graham followed Buffett's advice on how to restructure the company's pension plan. As a result, Graham Holding's pension plan is one of the best funded in corporate America. Buffett has also done two stints as a member of the company's board of directors.
The deal is also another example of Buffett investing prowess. Berkshire paid about $11 million for its stake in Graham Holdings, giving Buffett's company a profit of at least $1.1 billion, for a compounded return of roughly 12.3% a year over the past 40 years. Buffett's total return is more than that, because that calculation doesn't include the dividends Berkshire has collected along the way. That's far better than the S&P 500 (SPX), which had a compounded return of 7.7% in the same time period.
Buffett has done stock swap acquisitions before. The most recent one was in December when he swapped his stake in ConocoPhillips for a division of the company that made lubricant used in transporting oil through pipelines.
A letter to Katharine Graham offers an early window into how Warren Buffett thinks about investing.
FORTUNE -- One of the (many) things that surprised people about the recent $250 million sale of the Washington Post to Amazon (AMZN) founder Jeff Bezos was the health of the Washington Post's pension plan. At a time when most pension plans are struggling, the Post has $1 billion more than it needs. (As part of the MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Aug 15, 2013 7:00 AM ET
No matter what Jeff Bezos says now, once his purchase of the Post closes, he's almost certain to begin imposing his standards and beliefs in its pages.
FORTUNE -- When I first heard that Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon.com, was a Libertarian, I laughed out loud, because I thought it was a joke. Bezos's company, after all, is based on the Internet, which was created during the Cold War by a military research-and-development MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Aug 15, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Is Jeff Bezos' purchase of the Washington Post a problem for Amazon shareholders?
FORTUNE -- Did you hear that Jeff Bezos has agreed to purchase The Washington Post for $250 million? Of course you did, because you're a news consumer and your purveyors (i.e., me and my peers) are collectively obsessed by what happens in our own boardrooms.
And what you probably read were glowing accounts of how the Amazon (AMZN) founder MOREDan Primack - Aug 12, 2013 10:58 AM ET
The CEO tells Fortune why he sold his family's paper to Jeff Bezos, and what's next for the soon-to-be renamed Washington Post Co.
FORTUNE -- Donald E. Graham, the chairman and CEO of the Washington Post Co. (WPO) says he is "feeling good" about the company's sale of its flagship newspaper and other publishing businesses to Amazon (AMZN) CEO Jeff Bezos for $250 million in cash.
"I'm obviously very sad about our company MOREStephanie N. Mehta, Deputy Managing Editor - Aug 6, 2013 12:48 PM ET
Despite his recent acquisitions, Warren Buffett may not be as optimistic about the future of print as some people think.
FORTUNE -- With the sale of the Washington Post, Warren Buffett is once again showing the limits of his love affair with newspapers.
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA) is the largest outside investor in The Washington Post Co. (WPO) and has held the stock for four decades. Berkshire holds just over 1.7 MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Aug 6, 2013 5:00 AM ET
The Washington Post gets a new owner.
FORTUNE -- Rich guys used to boost their status by purchasing professional sports franchises. Now the game of 1 percentmanship has extended into the newspaper realm.
Amazon (AMZN) founder and CEO Jeff Bezos today announced that he will acquire The Washington Post newspaper and related properties from The Washington Post Co. (WPO). The deal is valued at $250 million, and includes several regional and special-interest MOREDan Primack - Aug 5, 2013 5:01 PM ET
Amazon.com is a retail powerhouse. But why are investors so enamored with its shares as it continues to produce disappointing profit growth?
FORTUNE -- Ah, Wall Street. You're always surprising us, aren't you? When Amazon.com reported earnings on Monday, you did the opposite of what we might expect. The online retailer's profits were down -- below expectations, even -- and yet you decided that the appropriate response was to bid up MOREDuff McDonald, Contributing Editor - Apr 28, 2011 2:53 PM ET
|GM's recalled Cobalt was a failure from the start|
|Michaels hack hit 3 million|
|Walmart offers cheaper money wire service|
|Americans have fallen in love with real estate once again|
|Satya Nadella needs more than one trick to fix Microsoft|