jpmorgan chase
A hole in JPMorgan's Dimon defense
May 16, 2013: 10:42 AM ETTo sway shareholders on next week's chairman vote, Jamie Dimon's supporters say focus on the bank's bottom line. They're hoping you will miss some accounting moves that have significantly boosted profits.
Jamie Dimon
FORTUNE -- Jamie Dimon likes to talk about JPMorgan Chase's fortress balance sheet. What's a little more shaky is the bank's income statement.
Next Tuesday, at its annual meeting in Tampa, JPMorgan (JPM) will reveal the results of a shareholder vote on whether the bank should split the role of CEO and chairman. Right now, Dimon holds both. Many shareholders think he should give up the chairmanship. The push for the move has gained momentum in the wake of last year's $6 billion trading loss and a litany of other run-ins with regulators in the past 12 months. The vote is expected to be close.
The main argument that Dimon and his supporters make for why the CEO should keep the chairman role as well is JPMorgan's bottom line. Bank analyst Dick Bove recently noted that only three companies in the U.S. netted more than JPMorgan last year. And that's in a year in which the bank had a $6 billion trading loss.
MORE: Jamie Dimon's successor short-list will not impress critics
Dimon has indeed steered his ship toward the money waterfall while others nearly capsized and have teetered since. But at least part of the bank's profit gusher is an illusion.
Take the first quarter of this year. JPMorgan said its income rose 31% to $6.5 billion. But more than two-thirds of that gain can be attributed to some nifty accounting coming out of the bank's mortgage division and not any real improvements in JPMorgan's business.
In fact, in the first three months of the year, JPMorgan's losses from potential bad home loans was negative $198 million. That means the bank booked a near-$200 million gain based on a prediction of how much it would lose from future bad loans.
How's that possible? Accounting, as you may already know, is more art than science. Even so, JPMorgan's books are more Jackson Pollock than Norman Rockwell.
Banks aren't forced to write off bad loans when a borrower stops paying. Instead, they are allowed to wait until they have made the determination that they will never get paid back. That typically happens weeks or, more often, months after a borrower ceases mailing in checks. Banks get a lot of leeway in making that determination. Until they do, the bad loan sits on the bank's books just like any other, delaying losses.
MORE: 3 things Jamie Dimon might have meant when he said he was richer than you
JPMorgan has long been slower than rivals to recognize bad loans. In the first quarter of last year, for instance, JPMorgan wrote off one dollar for every 90 the bank had in bad loans. That compared to an average write-off ratio at the nation's 100 largest banks of 34 at the time. This year, that ratio at JPMorgan has shot up to 178, meaning it is writing off bad loans at nearly half the rate it was a year ago. Writing off loans at that rate rather than the industry average appears to have saved JPMorgan $697 million in the first three months of the year alone.
Other big banks have slowed their write-off rate as well. But none is nearly as slow in recognizing losses as JPMorgan. The ratio of bad loans to charge-offs at Bank of America (BAC) and Wells Fargo (WFC) was 124 and 113, respectively.
That's not the only boost JPMorgan got from its accountants. On top of taking fewer loan losses, the bank also pulled money out of the fund it has set aside to cover future bad loans. As a result, an additional $650 million made its way to JPMorgan's bottom line. The result: What could have been a loss of $1.15 billion from bad loans turned into a gain of $200 million.
MORE: Why only half of Americans gain from the stock market rally
JPMorgan spokeswoman Kristin Lemkau says the bulk of the company's earnings gains have come from true improvements in its business. "We have had three years of record performance driven by market share gains in every line of business," says Lemkau. She says that Dimon has regularly told investors that he does not consider loan reserve releases as quality earnings.
Of course, the economy is improving, and house prices are rising. So you would expect fewer losses. Still, the bank's nonperforming loans have dropped by only 11%, far less than the 50% drop in write-offs. What's more, the volume of home loans at JPMorgan on which borrowers haven't made a payment in more than three months suddenly jumped $3.5 billion in the first quarter. That's the first jump in seriously delinquent loans the bank has seen in more than three years and could be a sign of more problems ahead.
Even without these accounting moves, though, the bank's bottom line would have been up $600 million or 10% in the first three months of the year. So it's hard to make the case that Dimon should go. But earnings at Citigroup (C) and Wells Fargo rose 31% and 22%, respectively. That puts the indispensability of Dimon in perspective.
-
Jamie Dimon successor short list will not impress critics
JPMorgan Chase's likely CEOs-in-waiting come from the part of the bank that makes regulators and investors most nervous.
FORTUNE -- Those pushing for change at JPMorgan Chase might not like what they get even if they are successful. More of the same.
A number of shareholders are advocating for the bank to split its chairman and chief executive officer roles, now both held by uber-banker Jamie Dimon. On Tuesday, Glass Lewis, a MORE
Stephen Gandel, senior editor - May 7, 2013 2:38 PM ET -
Study: Megabanks may disappear
Consultant calls recently proposed banking regulations "weapons of mass destruction."
FORTUNE -- Call it too big to succeed.
A report about the global banking industry by Boston Consulting Group, which was released on Tuesday, says new regulations and less business will force the big banks to dramatically shrink. Of the 28 global banks the consulting firm looked at, only a few of the leading players like -- Goldman Sachs (GS), Deutsche Bank MORE
Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Apr 30, 2013 2:13 PM ET -
The 10 stages of Jamie Dimon's blubbering London Whale grief
How Wall Street's most outspoken CEO publicly dealt with one of the largest trading losses in history.
FORTUNE -- It's been just over a year since the news started to emerge that a trader in JPMorgan Chase's London office had taken a huge bet on credit derivatives. It's nearly a year since Jamie Dimon began apologizing for it.
And while Dimon has definitely lived up to his reputation as Wall Street's most MORE
Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Apr 11, 2013 3:21 PM ET -
Wells Fargo should have failed the stress test
Federal Reserve officials dinged JPMorgan and Goldman for being off on their stress test results. Wells Fargo, however, got a pass.
FORTUNE -- It pays to be the teacher's pet, even when you are bad at sucking up.
Shortly after the Federal Reserve released the results of its recent stress test last week, Wells Fargo said in its own report that it had no idea how the Fed came up with its MORE
Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Mar 19, 2013 11:45 AM ET -
The Fed's stress test may not be stressful enough
Bank examination may understate the risk of a huge and growing financial product.
FORTUNE -- In the past year or so, bank executives have taken to referring to their balance sheets as fortresses. It could be a drinking game.
The phrase is supposed to signify how banks are better protected against loan and trading losses since the financial crisis. Later Thursday we'll get a chance to see just how strong the banks' MORE
Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Mar 7, 2013 7:44 AM ET -
3 things Jamie Dimon might have meant when he said he was 'richer than you'
FORTUNE -- At JPMorgan Chase's annual investor day on Tuesday, CEO Jamie Dimon answered one analyst's question by saying, "That's why I'm richer than you."
Zing. The line got a bunch of laughs. And it quickly became a headline for articles recounting the Q and lack of A between Dimon and the Credit Agricole analyst Mike Mayo, who has the reputation of being one of the few analysts to be tough MORE
Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Feb 27, 2013 5:32 PM ET -
JPMorgan's London Whale review: Inside job
Former regulators and legal experts say the way JPMorgan investigated its multi-billion dollar trading loss was "incomprehensible," "foolish" and "unusual."
FORTUNE -- Early on in the report on JPMorgan Chase's ill-fated $6 billion derivatives trading loss, the authors make it clear how culpable they believe CEO Jamie Dimon is: Not very.
On page 8 of the report the authors write, "The Task Force's views regarding firm chief executive officer Jamie Dimon are MORE
Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 18, 2013 1:07 PM ET -
JPMorgan's board is unchanged after $6 billion trading loss
Despite criticism, the "London Whale" trading loss has yet to result in a single change to JPMorgan Chase's board of directors.
FORTUNE --When the board of directors of JPMorgan Chase met on Tuesday, there was no need for introductions. Eight months after the bank disclosed one of the biggest trading losses in Wall Street's history, there's not a single new face on the board of JPMorgan (JPM). No one has left, MORE
Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 15, 2013 3:30 PM ET -
Fed: Mortgage rates won't get much lower
The Federal Reserve's efforts to help the mortgage market may have reached their limit.
FORTUNE -- If you are looking to refinance your mortgage, this is close to the best deal you're going to get. That's the message from two economists at the New York Federal Reserve.
That contradicts what some have been saying for a while. In fact, observers have been flummoxed about a split between home loans rates and mortgage MORE
Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 3, 2013 1:46 PM ET
