FORTUNE -- Every technology company relies on lawyers to some extent, but the legal industry itself has been largely devoid of technological innovation. Attorneys still rely on thick reference books or clumsy keyword searches, while most other industries have begun to harness the power of big data to bring structure to their reams of historical data.
Now a startup called Judicata is looking to change that, by developing a search platform that makes sense of legal precedent. Not exactly a prediction engine -- since each legal case is unique -- but certainly one that can help attorneys better play the odds.
Judicata yesterday announced $5.8 million in VC funding led by Khosla Ventures and its newest partner, Keith Rabois (who previously seeded the company while serving as COO of Square).
So I spent a few minutes discussing the deal with Rabois, and have posted an edited transcript below:
FORTUNE -- You were an attorney before transitioning into the tech world. Had you been keeping track of innovation in the legal industry, or lack thereof?
RABOIS: I had to revisit it, and was surprised to learn how similar things still were. It's been 13 or 14 years since I last practiced law, but it seems that people doing legal research today are doing it pretty much like I was.
So what is Judicata doing that traditional players like Lexis-Nexis or Westlaw are not?
One thing they do very well is reduce, by an order of magnitude, the number of hours and amount of money lawyers need to spend on research. Right now so much of it is still done through keyword searches that only sometimes produces relevant results. You can throw human editors at the process, but that's obviously very expensive and painful. The key is extracting meaning from thousands of cases at scale, which is what Judicata is doing.
For example, say you're looking for differences between similar cases in which the plaintiff was a male or the plaintiff was a female. It sounds simple, but right now the best way to do it is to go to old books and spend countless hours taking notes and then comparing those notes. Judicata can help organize and make sense of all that data.
The reality is that what they're doing is very challenging from a technology perspective. It's not surprising that the background of the team is from places like Google (GOOG).
Where are they in the process?
When they were launching it was mostly based on a theoretical approach, but they now have a working prototype based on having gone back over a substantial body of law. They will release a beta in September that will work on certain types of law and for California law.
Why begin with limited subsets and California? Does the system work better for certain types of law, or is it just a scaling issue?
I think it's scale and time. The logic behind the technology should work in all areas of law.
I've seen Judicata described as the Palantir of law. Fair?
I personally wouldn't adopt that label. I don't think great companies make that sort of comparison, because they each have their own culture, own market and value proposition.
There have been fewer VC-backed startups aimed at innovating in the legal market than in almost any other major U.S. industry. LegalZoom, I guess, is the notable exception to that. Are entrepreneurs just not interested, or are VCs ignoring them?
I've only been investing professionally for 10 weeks, so I don't want to come off like an expert on VC history. But, from my perspective, it's probably a bit of each.
To be successful in this domain you need some appreciation for the nuances of the profession, and it's rare to find someone who has that and advanced computer science ability. What's striking about Judicata is that a majority of the team has both a JD and CS degree. Sometimes I've gone by the office at lunch and seen them have the entire company take bar exams and debate the answers. It really is an unusual mix that would be very difficult to replicate.
Sign up for Dan's daily email newsletter on deals and deal-makers: GetTermSheet.com
Condoleezza Rice and her former Bush cabinet colleagues are partnering with venture capital firm Khosla Ventures to provide strategic insights for companies looking to expand into international markets.
By Omar Akhtar, reporter
FORTUNE -- President George W. Bush's foreign policy team is making a comeback of sorts as a business consultancy and it's just landed one of its most high-profile clients.
The consultancy, RiceHadleyGates LLP, headed by former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice MOREDec 13, 2012 6:30 AM ET
Not believing everything I hear.
A few months ago, a source told me that a notable VC firm had been propping up one of its larger portfolio company's valuations in order to raise a big new fund. I looked into it, but couldn't make the dots properly connect. So I sat on it.
Since then, however, I've heard the exact same theory from two other, independent sources. And then came news that the MOREDan Primack - Feb 17, 2012 11:05 AM ET
Former Google exec and Khosla partner has a new job.
Alex Kinnier has joined venture capital firm New Enterprise Associates as a partner, Fortune has learned.
Kinnier most recently was a Silicon Valley-based partner with Khosla Ventures, but left earlier this year to be closer to his family on the East Coast. His initial plan was to launch a start-up, but later opted to remain in the investment business. He will work MOREDan Primack - Nov 1, 2011 8:00 AM ET
Some details on Khosla Ventures' new $1 billion VC fund.
Khosla Ventures last week announced that it has closed its fourth general fund with $1.05 billion in capital commitments. A few notes, based on conversations with multiple sources:
1. The vehicle was oversubscribed, with over 90% of commitments coming from existing LPs. Considering that former cornerstone backer CalPERS decided not to re-up, that means a lot of increased commitments.
2. Almost all of Khosla's MOREDan Primack - Oct 17, 2011 11:34 AM ET
|Bernanke and China send world stocks lower|
|China factory activity hits 9-month low|
|J.D. Power ranks GM tops in quality for first time|
|Much faster Wi-Fi coming soon|
|Ben Bernanke's power over your money|