FORTUNE -- The Chinese economy hasn't fallen from the tightrope yet.
Markets in Asia rose Wednesday following the release of data showing that the growth of the Chinese economy slowed in the first quarter of 2014 to an annual rate of 7.4% from 7.7% the previous quarter. Though the first quarter saw the slowest growth for the Chinese economy in a year-and-a-half, markets were pleased with the way in which it was slowing -- with increases in retail sales signaling growth in domestic consumption and a slight decline in the rate of fixed asset investment growth, which show the Chinese turning away from what China bears see as a dependence on debt-fueled infrastructure projects.
But these statistics don't even begin to tell the story of how radically the Chinese economy continues to evolve. Millions of people per month continue to emigrate from China's farms to urban areas in search of work in the country's manufacturing sector, while the number of migrant workers in China is greater than the size of the entire American labor force. Maintaining an export sector that can supply jobs for all these people is priority No. 1 for China, lest a lack of economic progress leads to political instability.
And while data released Wednesday suggest that China is growing quickly enough while managing to slowly rebalance its economy, there are still plenty of reasons for critics to doubt they can continue to pull it off. Here are three:
1. Economic history suggests a seamless ascent isn't likely.
Be it the United States in the 1890s or Japan in the 1990s, it's common for economies to experience some sort of financial crisis as they make a transition from emergent to developed. Exceptions to this rule include Singapore and South Korea -- both of these "Asian Tigers" were able to ascend in status without lasting political or economic crises. Indeed, South Korea's transition from authoritarianism to democracy is sometimes cited as a model for those hopeful that democratic reforms will come to China. But even these economies were hit hard by the Asian financial crisis of the 1990s, and neither country is anywhere near as large or diverse as China.
2. The Chinese central government isn't all-powerful.
As former banker and author Satyajit Das pointed out recently, much of the case for expecting a so-called hard landing is centered around the way the central government interacts with powerful local governments in China. Writes Das,
An ancient Chinese proverb -- shan gāo, huángdì yuǎn -- states "The mountains are high and the emperor is far away." The saying implies that Beijing's control over its regions is historically weak, with local autonomy and little loyalty, meaning that central authorities have limited influence over local affairs.
Despite the central government's efforts to curb shadow bank lending to support big, economically questionable, politically motivated local infrastructure projects, there's plenty of evidence that these and other dodgy investments continue to be funded, threatening the stability of the system. A JPMorgan report from last year estimated that the size of the shadow banking sector doubled between 2010 and 2012 to $6 trillion. Even with recent efforts to rein in unregulated lending, much of the worst could already have been done.
3. Even without a bubble burst, wasteful spending could be a serious drag on growth.
In late January, a Chinese investment company was bailed out by the government after a coal company it was funding was forced to miss a debt payment. The bailout was arranged to calm fears that this particular fund company going belly up would spark panic in the rest of the shadow banking sector. The incident shows that the Chinese government is willing to go to great lengths to prevent a financial crisis, but Beijing can't do anything to reverse bad decisions made by shadow banks. Even if China can avoid a bursting of a debt bubble, its economy will still have to struggle under the weight of economically unproductive projects.
Despite recovery, key lending measure is still down.
FORTUNE -- Not only have the nation's banks fully recovered from the financial crisis, their bottom lines are now healthier than ever.
On Wednesday, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said profits at U.S. lenders hit an all-time high in 2013. For the year, the nation's banks made a collective $155 billion. That's up 10% from a year ago, and it was more than the MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Feb 26, 2014 10:21 AM ET
Over the past decade, a percentage point jump in GDP has created about 115,000 extra jobs a month. These days it's about half that.
FORTUNE -- On Thursday, we received more evidence that the economy is broken.
The government said GDP rose 3.2% in the last three months of 2013 -- one of the fastest rates since the end of the recession, though slower than the third quarter's 4.1%. Still, that sounds MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 30, 2014 3:17 PM ET
JPMorgan Chase's earnings showed that one measure of the U.S.'s financial health still hasn't recovered.Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 14, 2014 3:52 PM ET
Demand for short-term loans is increasing with wider income inequality, but the market needs price competition.
By Sheila Bair
FORTUNE -- It's tough being a regulator. Regulate "too much" and confront a chorus of critics who say you are constraining the public's ability to borrow money. Regulate "too little" and you face attacks for letting irresponsible lenders make abusive loans to vulnerable borrowers.
No issue illustrates this conundrum better than the market MORENov 26, 2013 5:00 AM ET
There are plenty of unanswered questions around the potential unwinding of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but one thing is certain: It will cost homebuyers more to get a mortgage.
FORTUNE – Efforts to wind down the government's support of America's biggest mortgage companies are gaining traction; the question now is how much more could it cost homebuyers if Congress scales down Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, or ends the companies MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Aug 8, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Expenses fell, but a lack of growth in consumer lending may be a sign of bigger problems at the bank, and in the economy in general.
FORTUNE -- Bank of America's second-quarter net income rose 63% to just over $4 billion, helped by a strong environment for Wall Street deals. Fees from arranging stock and bond offerings, and advising on corporate deals at BofA (BAC) jumped 36% from a year ago.
Those MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jul 17, 2013 7:45 AM ET
Fed votes to up the amount of capital banks have to have to cover loan losses, but leaves rules for subprime mortgages mostly in place.
FORTUNE -- The Federal Reserve voted Tuesday to approve rules that will require banks to hold more capital against the loans they make or risky assets they buy. The rules, proposed in the Dodd-Frank banking reform law, are a result of the financial crisis, when a MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jul 2, 2013 10:18 AM ET
The amount of money banks have at the Fed recently reached 13 digits, for the first time ever.
FORTUNE -- U.S. banks now have $1 trillion at the Federal Reserve. It's far more than they have ever had before, and it could be a big problem.
And it's a new one. Before the financial crisis, the amount of cash banks kept idle at the Fed rarely topped $25 billion, which in terms MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jun 12, 2013 9:47 AM ET
It was another good quarter for banks, but they're not quite fixed.
FORTUNE -- The credit crunch may be over, but we are crawling our way out.
After rising for all of last year, bank lending dropped in the first three months of the year, according to FDIC data compiled by bank research firm Bankregdata.com. The drop comes as low interest rates are squeezing how much money banks can make from their MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - May 8, 2013 7:00 AM ET
|Michaels hack hit 3 million|
|GM's recalled Cobalt was a failure from the start|
|Detroit pension cuts hit civilian workers hardest|
|Obama would cut deficits by another $1 trillion|
|Canadians arrest a Heartbleed hacker|