FORTUNE -- How risky is Goldman Sachs? Don't ask. Executives won't tell you.
On a conference call with analysts on Tuesday to announce first-quarter earnings, which beat expectations but still somehow disappointed, Goldman's CFO Harvey Schwartz was asked about a key measure that tracks how many potential risky securities or loans the bank has. Had it risen or dropped? Schwartz's response: We aren't saying.
Goldman (GS) doesn't have to. Dodd-Frank, the banking reform law passed in the wake of the financial crisis, doesn't require Goldman and other big banks to begin using the measure Schwartz was asked about for another few years. Nonetheless, nearly all the big banks began regularly disclosing the new figure of so-called risk-weighted assets, known as Basel 3, last year. Goldman is the only holdout.
The question of how much risky trading Goldman still does has been an issue in the wake of the Federal Reserve's recent stress tests. While Goldman passed the stress test, it was one of two banks, the other was JPMorgan Chase, that was asked to resubmit its capital plan despite otherwise getting a thumbs up from regulators. The Fed said it had some issues with Goldman but didn't say what.
CEO Lloyd Blankfein has repeatedly said the firm has closed its proprietary trading unit. And the firm's own numbers suggest it has cut back risk.
Still, the Fed's stress test estimated that Goldman could lose $25 billion from bad trades if we were to enter another financial crisis, more than any other bank the Fed tested. The fact that Goldman remains the only bank that's not reporting the new measure adds to the mystery and skepticism of the firm's claims that it has been cutting its risk levels.
Goldman does disclose an earlier figure that Dodd-Frank is phasing out. That measure of risky assets, known as Basel 1, appears to have risen pretty dramatically, up 20% or $80 billion, in the the first three months of the year to $480 billion, after dropping for much of 2012. But a source at Goldman says much of the jump has to do with a switch in the way the figure was calculated this year, not a reflection that Goldman is loading up on risky assets. Regulators required Goldman and others to make the change -- an interim step toward implementing the full Dodd-Frank measure in the next year or so.
Other banks also showed a jump in risky assets as a result of the change in the calculation. But not as much as at Goldman. At JPMorgan (JPM), the measure rose by 10%. At Citigroup (C), the figure jumped by 14%.
What's more, those other banks have been much more transparent about how much risky assets they have under the new Basel 3 rules. At JPMorgan, that measure of risky assets rose slightly in the first quarter. At Citi, the figure dropped.
Goldman did disclose that it had $728 billion in risk-weighted assets based on the way Dodd-Frank measures it at the end of the third quarter. That's the only time the firm has disclosed that number. At that time, its ratio of capital to those risky assets was 8.5%. Goldman now says that capital ratio has risen to 9%. But in the past six months, Goldman has earned about $5 billion. Add that to its capital, and it appears that Goldman's risky assets have grown as well, and now stand at about $740 billion.
All this might explain why Goldman's stock fell $2.36, or just over 1.6%, to $144 Tuesday even after the company reported strong earnings. Left in the dark, how can Goldman's investors know whether it's safe to stay?
The Federal Reserve bank stress test suggests a Goldman risk measure may be misleading.
FORTUNE -- In the last year or so, Goldman Sachs executives have tried to portray their firm, often seen as a Wall Street swashbuckler, as a lot less risky than it used to be. The Federal Reserve appears not to be convinced.
We'll get a better idea of what the Fed thinks on Thursday after the market closes, MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Mar 14, 2013 5:00 AM ET
The bank cuts its interest rate exposure after warnings from CEO Lloyd Blankfein and COO Gary Cohn.
FORTUNE -- Goldman Sachs is growing more nervous about the bond bubble.
In the past year, the investment bank has dramatically cut the amount of money it could lose on any given day if interest rates were to rise, which would cause bond prices to fall. The bank has also upped its own borrowing in MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 30, 2013 1:35 PM ET
The bank took in nearly $6 billion from proprietary trading in 2012, even as more plain-vanilla lending revenue continues to grow.
FORTUNE -- Here comes the new Goldman Sachs. And it looks a little bit like the old Goldman Sachs.
Goldman (GS) said Wednesday morning that it earned nearly $2.9 billion in the last three months of 2012, more than $1 billion more than analysts were expecting. Earnings per share more than MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 16, 2013 8:17 AM ET
The Goldman Sachs CEO says his firm is advising companies to take on more debt.
FORTUNE -- Lloyd Blankfein, the CEO of Goldman Sachs, says watch out for the bond market. Blankfein, talking Wednesday at The New York Times' Dealbook conference, said there appears to be a general complacency about low interest rates when he talks to investors.
"I think that is one of the big risks that are looming out there MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Dec 12, 2012 1:40 PM ET
A guide to the battle for control is playing out at the top of the Wall Street powerhouse that once dominated the financial world.
FORTUNE -- Shakespearean is a trope often used to describe the machinations of Wall Street power players, but only the Bard could do justice to the treacheries reportedly playing out at the top of Goldman Sachs. The story leaking out of the bank has all the ingredients MOREKatie Benner - Apr 16, 2012 10:28 AM ET
Pay is down at Goldman Sachs, but Blankfein still gets $5 million in cash for 2011.
FORTUNE - It's still good to be the king on Wall Street, just less so.
On Friday, Goldman Sachs (GS) said it paid its top five executives 35% less than it did a year ago. The company cut CEO Lloyd Blankfein's pay to $12 million for 2011 from $18 million a year ago.
That knocks Blankfein considerably MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Apr 13, 2012 10:02 AM ET
Exclusive: Goldman Sachs prepares for life after Lloyd Blankfein, and Gary Cohn is the leading candidate to succeed him as CEO.
FORTUNE -- Lloyd Blankfein may step down as chief executive of Goldman Sachs as early as this summer; and president and chief operating officer Gary Cohn is the lead candidate to replace him, according to a Goldman executive and a source close to the firm.
A Goldman spokesman declined to comment.
To be MOREKatie Benner - Feb 17, 2012 4:17 PM ET
Where's the market transparency in the SEC's vision of private offerings? Once again, only the wealthiest among us will have access to the best investing opportunities.
By Moshe Silver, Hedgeye
All that glitters is apparently not Goldman.
The firm set up a private marketplace in 2007, "open only to institutions and ultrarich investors," according to the Wall Street Journal. Its purpose was to permit companies to offer shares directly to buyers, without MOREApr 15, 2011 8:00 AM ET
When testimony gets confusing, lawyers risk losing the jury. Raj Rajaratnam's legal team may use an expert network of its own to interpret the whirl of complicated information.
When Goldman Sachs chief executive Lloyd Blankfein testified as part of the insider trading case against the hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam, the banker provided glimpses into the world of the Wall Street power house that were at times riveting, and at times MOREKatie Benner - Mar 24, 2011 11:19 AM ET
|Stocks finish higher for fourth straight week|
|Oil-price manipulation: the next Libor?|
|Prison exclusive: Bernie Madoff can't sleep|
|Google says you'll know when Glass is sketchy|
|Signs of new housing bubble in several areas|