Clarification: 11/22, 5:40 PM
FORTUNE -- Apparently, JPMorgan Chase's top lawyer has some hurt feelings over his bank's recent $13 billion fine.
Stephen Cutler, speaking Friday morning at an industry conference, fired back at the government and said that the regulation of banks is spiraling out of control. He said regulators are wasting taxpayers' resources by piling on infractions and issuing multiple fines for the same issue. He also questioned whether the current size of the fines his bank and others are being forced to pay makes sense. Earlier this week, JPMorgan (JPM) finalized terms of its $13 billion settlement with the government over mortgage misdeeds stemming from the run-up to the financial crisis.
"We should all be concerned that there doesn't seem to be a natural end point to how high fines could go," Cutler told the audience of bankers and regulators. "One hundred million dollars is still meaningful."
Cutler was speaking on a panel on banking litigation and enforcement at the annual event of The Clearing House, which is a trade organization that represents that nation's largest banks. Cutler broke the ice with saying he wasn't sure why he was there. He then said he could think of 13 billion reasons.
Cutler said it was unfair to make the nation's largest banks pay larger fines just because they are big. He said when he was at the Securities and Exchange Commission 15 years ago, the SEC hit IBM with a $10 million fine, which was the largest single fine at the time. That was a big deal, Cutler said. He got a lot of push-back from lawyers. Cutler, who was the head of the SEC's division of enforcement from 2001 to 2005, says he fears the fines banks are paying now are setting a new, much higher floor.
"Issues that used to be seen as part of regulators' normal supervisory function are now being treated as a basis for an enforcement action," said Cutler. "Not sure how we got here."
Cutler called for an inter-agency task force that could address the issue of regulator overlap. He said given the limited resources granted to regulators, it makes little sense for multiple regulators to be investigating the same issues. Recently, a number of observers have said the Commodities and Futures Trading Commission does not appear to have the resources it needs to enforce new rules that are supposed to make derivatives markets less risky. "In the London Whale case, we found that anytime anyone came up for questioning we got requests from seven regulators," said Cutler. "Basically, the interviews had to be conducted in auditoriums."
Cutler also questioned whether regulators had guidelines for when they press for admissions of guilt when settling cases, which regulators often hadn't done in the past. But recently, the SEC and others have come under criticism in the wake of the financial crisis for allowing banks to pay large fines without actually admitting wrongdoing. JPMorgan was forced to admit that it violated securities laws in the London Whale trading blow up. In the recent mortgage settlement, the bank said it agreed with the facts included in the governments settlement. Although, those admissions are so general it's not clear how much they will hurt JPMorgan in future legal battles.
Dan Stipano, a top official at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency who was also on the panel, said that he thought it was clear that there should have been some admission of guilt in the case of the London Whale, but that his agency did not have a new policy of always pushing for guilty pleas. He said that "neither admits nor denies" continues to be standard language in his OCC's settlement paperwork.
Clarification: An earlier version of this story said that JPMorgan admitted guilt in connection with its recent $13 billion settlement. In fact, JPMorgan agreed to a statement of facts as part of the settlement that said the bank regularly misrepresented the quality of the home loans in the mortgage bonds it sold investors in the run up to the financial crisis.
Did Jamie Dimon just make another mistake in JPMorgan's legal battles?
FORTUNE -- On Friday, JPMorgan said that it had put aside $23 billion to cover future fines and legal bills. Even beyond the size, the disclosure was an unusual one. Banks don't typically say how much they have to cover legal bills. And it's the first time that JPMorgan has ever disclosed the number.
Bank executives have long said they won't MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Oct 11, 2013 2:36 PM ET
Unlike today's problems, tomorrow's headaches can't be cured by writing a few checks.
FORTUNE -- People tend to spend way too much time worrying about what's in the headlines and not enough time worrying about things, buried in small type, that are less obvious but lots more important. Today's case in point: J.P. Morgan Chase.
JPM (JPM), as we'll call it, has been playing the role of piñata for plaintiffs and regulators MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Oct 9, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Why haven't JPMorgan's legal issues done more to dent the stock?
FORTUNE -- Call him the Teflon Dimon.
On Thursday, the day after news broke that JPMorgan Chase may have to pay the government at least $11 billion in fines -- the largest single financial fine in history -- its shares rose. Perhaps one of the biggest oddities of JPMorgan's past year and a half is how the stock has done. Despite MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Sep 27, 2013 11:08 AM ET
The bank said it did something wrong, but it's not saying what.
FORTUNE -- The Securities and Exchange Commission is taking a victory lap over Thursday's JPMorgan Chase London Whale settlement. And it's got a cheering section, something that has been relatively unusual for regulators in the wake of the financial crisis. The Wall Street Journal calls the settlement "historic," and the Huffington Post says the settlement "amounts to a relatively stirring MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Sep 20, 2013 9:12 AM ET
Lots of people at JPMorgan worked together to hide losses from investors and regulators. Only two of them may be going to jail.
FORTUNE -- Long live the Whale.
The most fascinating thing about the government's charge that JPMorgan Chase employees committed fraud in connection with the bank's $6 billion trading loss, and the one that will have the largest reverberations for Wall Street, is not who is being charged, but who MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Aug 14, 2013 3:31 PM ET
Collateralized loan obligations are back, even in the most unlikely places.
FORTUNE -- The former office of JPMorgan Chase's London Whale is diving back into risk.
According to several people familiar with the deals, JPMorgan's London chief investment office, which last year lost more than $6 billion betting on credit derivatives, is in the process of inking deals to buy significant portions of collateralized loan obligations, which are structured bonds that are backed MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jul 18, 2013 1:06 PM ET
How Wall Street's most outspoken CEO publicly dealt with one of the largest trading losses in history.
FORTUNE -- It's been just over a year since the news started to emerge that a trader in JPMorgan Chase's London office had taken a huge bet on credit derivatives. It's nearly a year since Jamie Dimon began apologizing for it.
And while Dimon has definitely lived up to his reputation as Wall Street's most MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Apr 11, 2013 3:21 PM ET
Former JPMorgan official Ina Drew say she didn't engage in any misconduct.
FORTUNE -- On Friday, Ina Drew, the former head of JPMorgan Chase's chief investment office and ultimate boss of the London Whale, told a Senate subcommittee that she was misled. What's more, despite the $6.2 billion loss -- one of the biggest in Wall Street history -- Drew believes she did a "reasonable and diligent" job even as the MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Mar 15, 2013 11:45 AM ET
Former regulators and legal experts say the way JPMorgan investigated its multi-billion dollar trading loss was "incomprehensible," "foolish" and "unusual."
FORTUNE -- Early on in the report on JPMorgan Chase's ill-fated $6 billion derivatives trading loss, the authors make it clear how culpable they believe CEO Jamie Dimon is: Not very.
On page 8 of the report the authors write, "The Task Force's views regarding firm chief executive officer Jamie Dimon are MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 18, 2013 1:07 PM ET
|2 million Facebook, Gmail and Twitter passwords stolen in massive hack|
|Job growth drives mortgage rate jump|
|Investors brace for big dip in stocks|
|GM to discontinue Chevrolet brand in Europe|
|Ron Paul: Bitcoin could 'destroy the dollar'|