McGraw Hill

That $5 billion lawsuit against S&P? No problem

September 20, 2013: 5:00 AM ET

The U.S. government is suing the ratings agency for fraud in its pre-crisis ratings, but investors are pooh-poohing the threat.

By Craig Giammona

130919173311-mcgraw-hill-620xa

FORTUNE -- The market doesn't seem too concerned about the federal government's fraud lawsuit against Standard and Poor's Ratings Services. The Department of Justice is seeking $5 billion in damages, claiming that S&P helped cause billions in investor losses during the financial crisis by inflating ratings on mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations to curry favor with issuers.

News of the suit initially spooked investors and sent shares of parent company McGraw Hill Financial (MHFI) tumbling. In the seven months since then, however, S&P's shares have soared nearly 50%.

After dropping from $58 on Feb. 1 to $45 on Feb. 5, the day after DOJ filed its case, McGraw Hill's stock price has been trading at post-crisis highs around $65. S&P is by far the most important business for McGraw Hill, generating nearly 71% of its $1.2 billion in profit last year. In the quarter that ended June 30, revenue was up 24% for S&P and came in at a record $599 million, beating a previous mark set in 2007, the company said.

MORE: More Americans pay mortgage first again, then credit cards

"There's just a lot of headline risk," says Manav Patnaik, a research analyst at Barclays. "It's not something I see having any meaningful effect in the near term. Two years down the road, when this thing [the lawsuit] develops further and we get a better idea where it's headed, you could argue you should be worried about it. But outside of that it doesn't affect the running of the business."

Initial settlement talks between McGraw Hill and the government broke down over the Feds' reported demand for an admission of wrongdoing and a $1 billion fine. McGraw Hill had $1.9 billion in cash at the end of 2012 and could weather a significant financial settlement, assuming the company doesn't admit fraud, analysts say. (A fraud admission could expose the company to more liability from private suits.) McGraw Hill has said the case is without merit and noted that its pre-crash ratings were objective and consistent with those of other market participants.

But the company has lost at least one legal skirmish so far: In July a judge ruled against the company's effort to dismiss the case on the grounds that S&P's statements about the integrity of its reports were mere "puffery," and that investors would not rely on such statements. Earlier this month, the company took an aggressive legal tack, accusing the Feds of filing the suit as retribution for S&P's decision to strip the U.S. of its AAA credit rating in 2011. (Moody's (MCO), for example, was not sued by the U.S., despite issuing pre-crisis ratings similar to S&P's.)

MORE: Investors may regret taking a bite of Verizon's big bond deal

Analysts and investors note that it's difficult to anticipate how the lawsuit will play out, but they point out that McGraw Hill's stock started its climb above $60 once market observers had a chance to examine the details of the case. The perception is that the government's case is weak and that the worst case scenario for McGraw Hill is a cash settlement that could cut into profits but won't derail the business.

"It's very difficult to predict the future actions of either party, but with the financial strength of the McGraw Hill balance sheet with $2 billion in cash, they are more than likely comfortable with any fiscal penalty that may arrive before a court case," says David Reynolds, an analyst at Jefferies.

There were calls to change the securities rating system after the financial crisis, but the basic structure remains, with S&P and Moody's paid to issue ratings of securities being sold by its clients. Like McGraw Hill, Moody's has made a steep climb in the past seven months and now trades above $70. Both companies have a forward price/earnings ratio of 18.

MORE: Behind the Fed's major stimulus blunder

In addition to S&P, McGraw Hill also operates the S&P 500 (SPX) and Dow Jones Industrial Average (INDU) indices, J.D. Power and Associates, McGraw Construction, S&P Capital IQ and Platts, a commodities information firm. McGraw Hill completed the sale of its textbook publishing business, McGraw Hill Education, to Apollo Management for $2.5 billion earlier this year and recently unloaded Aviation Week as part of its drive to focus on its strength in the financial information sector.

"McGraw Hill Financial demonstrated its commitment to shareholders by selling off non-core assets and returning its excess cash to shareholders," says Anthony Gennaro, portfolio manager of Oppenheimer's Main Street Select Fund, a $6.4 billion fund holding 2.5 million shares of McGraw Hill Financial. "We like McGraw Hill Financial because they own several high-growth, high-margin businesses such as Platts and the S&P indices businesses, which are mission critical to their users and are often misvalued or ignored by investors focused solely on S&P's rating business."

McGraw Hill started trading under a new ticker in May and Doug Peterson, who took over as president of the S&P ratings service in August 2011, will become McGraw Hill's new chief executive on Nov. 1, replacing Harold McGraw III. Peterson will become the third non-family chief executive in the company's history, which dates back to 1888.

MORE: Did inflation delay the Fed's taper?

Peterson, a Citibank veteran credited with smoothing over that firm's issues with Japanese regulators in 2004, stabilized S&P at a tough time for McGraw Hill and the ratings service. S&P faced inquiries into its ratings of the securities at the heart of the financial crisis, while the parent company was under pressure from activist investors to split up. In 2011, profit dropped 6% at S&P, falling to $720 million, amid internal disagreement over changes to the company's ratings structure. Peterson led a significant turnaround of the business, and the rating service made $849 million for McGraw Hill in 2012. It's not clear who will run S&P once Peterson is formally promoted, but his knowledge of the company's most profitable business is another reason analysts think McGraw Hill is in a solid position.

"Doug is someone who comes in with deep domain knowledge," said William Bird, an analyst at Lazard Capital Markets. "I think he's been effective at striking a good balance between managing a business responsibility and commercializing a business."

The DOJ's fraud lawsuit remains the biggest long-term question surrounding McGraw Hill, with the potential to wipe out about five years worth of company profit. Still, even with S&P seemingly digging in for a long legal fight, it remains likely that the case will end with a settlement, legal experts say. Even if settlement talks don't pick up a steam, a trial is not likely until 2015.

  • Unhappy holidays from McGraw-Hill

    The McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP) today released an update on its "growth and value plan." Sounds positive, until you actually read the details.

    The company, which in September announced plans to spin off its education unit, said that it will lay off approximately 10% of its workforce. That works out to 550 pink slips, with most to occur by year-end. Twenty percent of the cuts will be within McGraw-Hill's executive ranks.

    The company also MORE

    - Dec 8, 2011 4:32 PM ET
    Posted in: ,
  • The spinoff boom is a boon for this economy

    Job creation, innovation, and shareholder value: Who said breaking up is hard to do?

    FORTUNE -- Not too long ago the prevailing corporate buzzword was "synergy." Combine one business with another, eliminate redundancies, and watch the profits accumulate. Not all mergers would succeed, of course, but two heads would usually prove better than one, particularly at companies where revenue and innovation had stagnated.

    In 2011, however, a growing number of large companies MORE

    - Oct 21, 2011 5:00 AM ET
  • SEC takes a swipe at S&P

    Regulators may punish the rating agency for its role in a 2007 CDO deal.

    FORTUNE -- The Securities and Exchange Commission may take formal action against the credit rating agency Standard & Poor's, the company said in a statement Monday.

    McGraw-Hill, the parent company of S&P, received a so-called Wells Notice from the SEC last Thursday, which said that the commission could fine the company for alleged securities violations related to a MORE

    - Sep 26, 2011 10:47 AM ET
  • Meet the man who will lead S&P

    An executive who has tackled some huge problems at Citigroup prepares to lead S&P through rocky times. He faces tough times, an uncertain future and the possibility of a big payday. 

    FORTUNE -- When Doug Peterson becomes president of Standard & Poor's this September, he'll inherit a series of headaches that few would envy. S&P is under fire from politicians for downgrading the United States from AAA to AA+. The Department MORE

    - Aug 24, 2011 6:17 AM ET
  • Activists put pressure on McGraw-Hill

    Is the world's most powerful company about to get broken up?

    No, I'm not talking about Wal-Mart. Or Exxon Mobile. Or Google.

    This is about McGraw-Hill (MHP), the information services company whose units include credit rating agency Standard & Poor's. You know, the same S&P that may or may not be fixing to downgrade America's credit rating from AAA to AA. Or the same S&P that did stamp AAA on shoddy sub-prime MORE

    - Aug 2, 2011 2:27 PM ET
Current Issue
  • Give the gift of Fortune
  • Get the Fortune app
  • Subscribe
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.