Medicare
Cut your exposure to Medicare taxes
January 31, 2013: 5:00 AM ETAs Congress tackles entitlement reform, affluent retirees will be stuck with a growing tax bill. Here's how to keep it in check.
By Janice Revell, contributor
FORTUNE -- With a new debt ceiling showdown in front of us, the debate in Washington over how to curb costs for Medicare and Social Security is front and center. One of the most contentious issues is an approach called means testing -- boosting costs and cutting benefits for more affluent seniors. What isn't widely understood is that Congress voted for limited means testing years ago. And the entitlement cuts have been quietly engineered to smack an ever-growing number of retirees over time. Ironically, though, a provision buried in the recent fiscal-cliff deal could help many minimize the hit.
MORE: 2013: The year we become the health care nation
The means testing of Medicare began in 2007, when high-income retirees were required to start paying higher premiums for Medicare Part B, which covers outpatient medical services, including doctor visits, lab tests, and emergency room visits. The Part B premium for most retirees in 2013 is $105 a month. But for seniors with incomes above $85,000 a year (or $170,000 for married couples), premiums start at $147 a month and can reach as high as $336.
The income thresholds, which used to be increased for inflation each year, were frozen under the Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare) through 2019. As a result, the number of seniors owing the higher Part B premiums will more than double by then, to about 10% of all beneficiaries, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
MORE: The controversy over Medicare reform
Social Security's means-testing approach is far more draconian. It began in 1984, when the Social Security system faced a funding crisis and Congress passed a law requiring affluent retirees to pay taxes on up to 50% of their benefits. The tax kicked in when half the Social Security benefit plus a retiree's other income exceeded $25,000 ($32,000 for couples). At the time, only about 10% of retirees had incomes high enough to trigger the tax. In 1994 a second layer of Social Security tax was added: up to 85% of benefits became taxable if half the Social Security benefit plus other income topped $34,000 ($44,000 for couples). None of those income thresholds were ever indexed to inflation. The result: About one-third of retirees are now paying federal income tax on their Social Security benefits.
MORE: The next entitlement crisis
The best way to minimize the blow from means testing is to put more of your retirement savings into a Roth IRA or Roth 401(k). Your contributions are made with after-tax dollars, but then all future investment gains and withdrawals are tax-free -- and don't count as income for triggering higher taxes or premiums on Social Security and Medicare. A provision in the fiscal-cliff deal now allows workers of any age to convert a traditional 401(k) into a Roth 401(k); previously, only workers over the age of 59½ could do so. Almost half of all large employers offer a Roth 401(k); check with your benefits department. At least Congress handed one favor to future retirees.
--A former compensation consultant, Janice Revell has been writing about personal finance since 2000.
This story is from the February 4, 2013 issue of Fortune.
-
Lucky 2013: A case for economic good times
It's easy to predict gloom and doom for the U.S. economy. But strong growth and job recovery are no pie-in-the-sky fantasies.
By Geoff Colvin, senior editor-at-large
FORTUNE -- In your sleep you can name 10 reasons 2013 will be lousy for business and the economy. So can I. But analyzing only the downside is a bad habit; missing a boom is at least as dangerous as missing a bust. So let's MORE
Jan 18, 2013 5:00 AM ETPosted in: economic recovery, Economy, Geoff Colvin, Medicare, Obamacare, Oil and Gas, tax reform, unemployment -
The critical facts that no one mentioned in the debt debate
Hiking taxes on the rich has a long history of backfiring. Let's learn from history.
By Geoff Colvin, senior-editor-at-large
FORTUNE -- Is it socially and politically okay to do what we've just done -- commit to cutting federal spending by trillions without asking anyone to pitch in by paying higher taxes? The answer is yes. In this case it's definitely okay, current market fluctuations notwithstanding. But the reasons have nothing to do MORE
Aug 25, 2011 5:00 AM ET -
How to raise the debt ceiling? Cut military spending
Defense spending helped create today's fiscal problems. So why isn't it being considered seriously as a way to help fix them?
FORTUNE -- Throughout the drama that's stalled Washington lawmakers in raising the $14.3 trillion debt limit, there's been little talk of slicing military spending as Republicans call for big budget cuts. Reductions to Medicare, Medicaid and possibly Social Securityhave been the bigger focus.
The talks have reached a frenzy on Capitol Hill. MORE
Nin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Jul 15, 2011 11:38 AM ET -
GOP Medicare bet: There's a market for bold
Republican strategists have noticed that courage sells, even in blue states. Maybe the GOP should step up to the plate and acknowledge they want real reform for Medicare.
By Nina Easton, senior editor-at-large
FORTUNE -- Want to know why the federal government is shouldering a $14.3 trillion debt, why that debt could equal 77% of the total economy by 2021, and why we face market whispers of a looming "debt crisis" that MORE
May 30, 2011 8:25 PM ET -
Paul Ryan's Medicare 'reform' hocus pocus
The Wisconsin congressman's proposed Medicare fix sure sounds wonderful, but it would leave the average Medicare recipient befuddled at best and on a path toward financial catastrophe at worst.
By Allan Sloan, senior editor at large
FORTUNE -- Beware of magical solutions and one-size-fits-all ideological agendas -- like the idea that free markets can solve all our problems. When you think about it, it's just as silly as the idea that government MORE
Apr 15, 2011 5:00 AM ET -
The economic bullishness behind the Ryan budget
Paul Ryan's budget dramatically reduces the size of the federal government over the long run, which could be incredibly bullish for economic growth in the United States.
By Daryl Jones, Hedgeye
FORTUNE - The current budget debate in Washington is among the most heated and partisan we've seen since the beginning of the Obama administration. On the conservative side of the equation is, of course, the Ryan budget, which was introduced two MORE
Apr 7, 2011 2:53 PM ET -
In defense of Paul Ryan's Medicare plan
The House budget chairman's vision of bringing the market to Medicare isn't perfect, but it's the best choice in a world of poor alternatives.
FORTUNE -- By far the most significant -- and revolutionary -- proposal in Congressman Paul Ryan's 2012 budget is its blueprint for taming Medicare. According to the Congressional Budget Office's analysis, issued on April 5th, the Ryan plan would totally reverse the course of recent fiscal history MORE
Shawn Tully, senior editor-at-large - Apr 7, 2011 11:14 AM ET
