FORTUNE -- Observers have long been worried about the New York Stock Exchange's ability to police stock trading so that it's fair for all investors. The acquisition by the InterContinental Exchange (ICE), which in late-December agreed to buy the NYSE (NYX) for $8.2 billion, may make matters worse.
Historically, the NYSE has been what's called a self-regulating organization. The Securities and Exchange Commission looks over its shoulder, but basically the NYSE is in charge of what goes on on its exchange. It creates and enforces the rules, and makes sure they don't favor some investors - namely the large banks - over others.
"The challenge for self-regulatory organizations is balancing the public interest and the economic interest of its members," says Joel Seligman, who is the President of the University of Rochester and an expert on the NYSE and regulation. He is also a board member of FINRA, a member organization that regulates brokerage firms. "The NYSE has done a good job of this, but some organizations have done a better job of the balancing act than others."
If the takeover by ICE goes through, though, the responsibility of regulating the nation's largest stock market will ultimately fall on the shoulders of the NYSE's new owner. And while most observers, at least until recently, believe self-regulation has worked well for the stock market, the same can't be said of the business in which ICE makes its money - derivatives.
Here's the issue: even more than the stock business, the derivatives market is dominated by a few players. Four large banks - JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Citigroup (C), Bank of America (BAC) and Goldman Sachs (GS) - account for nearly 95% of all derivatives exposure in the U.S.
Dennis Kelleher, who runs investor advocacy group Better Markets, says those four banks have a large influence over ICE. Even after ICE adds the NYSE's significant stock business, ICE will still make the bulk of its profits in derivatives. The worry is that the banks might use their influence over ICE to tilt the rules that govern stock trading at the NYSE in their favor, hurting individual investors.
ICE has been accused of collusion before. Competitors such as Bank of New York Mellon and Newedge have complained that ICE and its largest customers - namely those four large banks - have sought to restrict competition. Kelleher and others have said this may be leading to worse prices for investors and users of derivative contracts, which companies buy to hedge everything from energy prices to the risk that one of their suppliers could go out of business.
"It must never be forgotten that the history of these markets is a history of anti-competitive, self-interested, predatory conduct that serves the interest of the exclusive few at the expense of the many and the system as a whole," wrote Kelleher in a comment letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission on how proposed rules in Dodd-Frank should be applied in the derivatives market.
Robert Litan, a former top antitrust official at the Department of Justice who is now the director of research at Bloomberg Government, said he didn't think the merger would change the way the NYSE regulates trading, which has traditionally been done differently in the derivatives and stock markets.
ICE and its main competitor the Chicago Mercantile Exchange have kept all their regulation responsibilities in house. The NYSE has kept rule writing in house, but outsourced the monitoring and regulation of brokers to FINRA, which is a non-profit collectively owned by the brokerage firms, in recent years. Experts say FINRA is likely to retain that regulatory authority at the NYSE. Neither ICE nor NYSE have commented on how regulation will be handled after the merger.
In the last year or so, lawmakers and even some Wall Streeters have become increasingly worried about the NYSE's ability to police itself. In September, the SEC fined the NYSE $5 million to settle allegations that the exchange gave access to traded data to certain high frequency trading firms ahead of the general public.
In mid-December, the Senate Banking Committee held a hearing on the NYSE and stock trading. At the hearing, Credit Suisse's Dan Mathisson argued that it no longer made sense to allow the NYSE and other exchanges to continue regulating themselves. "Exchanges have long been considered by courts to be quasi governmental entities," Mathisson told the committee. "But exchanges today are clearly not governmental entities. They are for-profit, private companies."
The acquisition by ICE, which unlike the NYSE has never been a non-profit, makes it even more clear that exchanges care more about investors than their customers. And it puts the NYSE's ability to regulate itself that much more into question.
"The emergence of increasingly different trading rules and venues for institutions and individual investors is one of the biggest issues regulators will have to tackle," Seligman says.
It's an issue that the NYSE can't be allowed to tackle on its own.
Traders say there were unexplained price swings and "quote spamming."
FORTUNE -- When stocks reopened for trading on Wednesday, for the first time since Hurricane Sandy, the market was a rare bit of calm. Stocks were bought and sold. Trading was never halted. The market even went up a bit.
To the average investor, it was an average day, and, other than what lead up to it, an unexciting one at that.
But MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Nov 6, 2012 12:15 PM ET
An increase in stock trading rule changes is making it hard for firms to keep up.
FORTUNE -- Perhaps the only thing moving faster than high-frequency traders are the changes to the rules that govern how they trade.
On the day of the flub that cost Knight Capital Group (KCG) $440 million in 45 minutes and briefly caused turmoil in over 100 stocks, the New York Stock Exchange issued three changes to MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Aug 8, 2012 2:40 PM ET
Building error-free trading software is impossible, and that makes today's stock markets even more fragile.
FORTUNE -- One question keeps arising in the saga of Knight Capital and its $440 million software glitch: why did Knight, one of the premier U.S. market makers that handles more than 10% of total stock trading, introduce glitchy software into the market?
CEO Thomas Joyce explained in a television interview that the company's new software program MOREScott Cendrowski, writer-reporter - Aug 3, 2012 2:17 PM ET
The high frequency trading battle between exchanges and market makers is resulting in big losses not just for Wall Street, but, likely, for us too.
Update 11:00 pm
FORTUNE -- In life there are few coincidences, and this one probably isn't either: The day Knight Capital Group's computers nearly blew up the market and lost the firm $440 million in 45 minutes is the same day that the New York Stock Exchange MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Aug 2, 2012 4:32 PM ET
The NYSE says uneven regulation is sending more and more trades into Wall Street's so-called dark pool and hurting investors.
FORTUNE -- The owner of the New York Stock Exchange says it's being picked on. And that could be hurting investors as well.
A top official at the NYSE Euronext, which owns the U.S.'s largest stock exchange, says regulators are singling out the NYSE and other listed markets in enforcing stock trading MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Mar 8, 2012 11:54 AM ET
The planned merger between the NYSE and the Deutsche Boerse has stalled, but the exchanges might revive it if they go after their largest competitors: The banks.
By Cyrus Sanati, contributor
FORTUNE -- The $17 billion mega merger between the New York Stock Exchange and Germany's Deutsche Boerse may look dead, but there's still a pulse. Company officials have just under three weeks to convince top leaders in the European Union that MOREJan 13, 2012 10:01 AM ET
The Nasdaq wants the NYSE, and the NYSE wants the Deutsche Bourse. This love triangle is going to get even more tangled before it sorts out.
By Cyrus Sanati, contributor
There seems to be little stopping the New York Stock Exchange in going ahead with its planned merger with Deutsche Bourse -- not even the promise of more money. The NYSE board's unequivocal rejection this week of an alternate ties up with MOREApr 13, 2011 5:00 AM ET
The proposed merger of the NYSE and the Deutsche Börse is just the latest in a wave of similar deals, even as smaller competitors continue to grab business.
By Chris Redman, contributor
If Deutsche Börse manages to complete its acquisition of NYSE Euronext -- and that's a big if because of antitrust concerns and fears that the U.S. will chafe at losing control of the fabled New York Stock Exchange -- the MOREMar 9, 2011 5:00 AM ET
As regulators start to scrutinize the proposed combination of the NYSE and the Deutsche Börse, they'll need to take into account much more than just equity trading.
By Cyrus Sanati, contributor
The battle for the soul of Wall Street continues as the fate of the New York Stock Exchange remains up in the air. The NYSE's tentative $10 billion sale to Germany's Deutsche Börse will need to pass through a regulatory gauntlet MOREMar 2, 2011 10:13 AM ET
|Tesla repays federal loan nearly 10 years early|
|How police can find your deleted text messages|
|HP soars as Meg Whitman turnaround continues|
|Stocks slip as Fed sends mixed message|
|Insanely durable smartphone ... from Caterpillar?|