FORTUNE -- Different people mark the end of the year in different ways. One of my traditions is reviewing my work for the year, owning up to mistakes that I haven't already corrected, and following up on some of what I've written. It's not as much fun as passing out my wife's delicious Chanukah cookies to my colleagues, another year-end ritual, but it has its uses.
• I predicted a difficult year for investors in 10-year Treasury securities. My February prediction -- "buy today, cry tomorrow" about long Treasuries -- has been accurate. But that was such an obvious call that it was like shooting fish in a barrel, as opposed to fishing.
• What turned out to be wildly wrong was my prediction that the 30-year, 6.55% bonds that Verizon (VZ) issued in September would tank. I mocked a friend of mine who bought them at 106% of face value the day they were issued. When last I looked, they were trading at 116. Score one for you, David.
• I apologize for getting more than 400 of you to waste your time sending e-mails to the Financial Accounting Standards Board urging it to require companies to disclose the U.S. income taxes they pay for a given year. (Not in a given year, which is already required, but for a given year.) FASB took note of the emails, but didn't do what they asked.
Knowing actual taxes would allow the argument over corporate tax rates to be based on facts rather than on the fictional numbers companies use in their financial reports. FASB or the Securities & Exchange Commission could enlighten the debate in a minute by requiring companies to disclose the taxes-incurred information from their corporate tax returns, which would require almost no effort on the companies' part. But absent a change, that's not going to happen because there's no major business or political constituency to force FASB or the SEC to do something that will irritate corporate America. Too bad.
• People wonder why I'm so down on the Volcker Rule, the subject of my most recent column. It's because I consider it horribly and needlessly complex, and think that comparing it with Glass-Steagall -- a piece of relatively simple Depression-era legislation that held up for decades -- is ludicrous. All Volcker and Glass-Steagall have in common is that they're named for people.
I'm no Paul Volcker fan. I had no dealings with him when he ran the Federal Reserve, but I watched him bungle Arthur Andersen after he was appointed to chair Andersen's independent oversight board when the firm was marred by its role in the Enron scandal.
Volcker should have segregated the Andersen offices untainted by Enron and made them a new operation. A simple, obvious fix. Instead, he puffed on his cigars, held forth, and the firm was indicted and convicted on criminal charges. By the time the conviction was overturned, Andersen was long gone.
Emilie Feldman, currently an assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School (and a family friend), published a nifty paper in 2006 pointing out that had Andersen tried to combine with one of the other then-Big Five accounting firms, it would have violated anti-trust standards. Thanks in good part to Volcker, the Big Five firms are now down to the Final Four. That works great for college basketball -- for accounting, not so well.
• I found myself in the unusual position of siding with JPMorgan Chase, which I don't remember ever having done before. I'm no fan of giganticism or complexity, both of which afflict JPM (JPM). But the bank is not the source of all evil in America, as it's being made out to be. The idea that JPM should not be allowed to deduct perfectly deductible payments it made to settle lawsuits brought by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and others is silly and unfair.
• And my ritual disclosure: One share of stock in a Detroit bank that I bought for $40 about 40 years ago when I was the Detroit Free Press banking reporter and wanted to make sure I could attend shareholder meetings has morphed into $2,350 of JPM stock.
• I'm glad that I managed to figure out that President Obama's post-Presidential pension and other benefits are worth roughly twice as much as his Treasury proposal would allow regular people to have in pensions and retirement accounts without facing tax penalties. There are definitely abuses of the system, such as the likes of Mitt Romney sticking ridiculously low-priced assets into retirement accounts. But you know what? Had 401(k)s existed when I began my career and had I been able to max out on contributions, the value of my retirement benefits and pensions would likely have exceeded the proposed limit. And I've played it totally straight, no games.
• Two final follow-ups: When I referred to "survivors" in my column about deciding when to take Social Security, I was talking about children and grandchildren, not spouses. Each member of a married couple has his or her own benefits. I don't think of them as "survivors." Sorry for the confusion.
• When I wrote about the proposed spinoff of my employer, Time Inc., from Time Warner (TWX), I said that former Time Inc. chief financial officer Howard Averill, who left to become CFO of Time Warner, had forfeited a $1.75 million payment that he would have gotten if the spinoff were completed. Soon after my column ran, Time Warner disclosed that it had paid Averill $1.75 million to compensate him for the foregone payment.
And that will do it. Have a great end of the year, and a happy, healthy, and prosperous 2014.
How well-heeled money to conservative tax exempts triggered confusion and chaos inside the IRS -- and why the big bucks may be likely to surge.
By Lynnley Browning
FORTUNE -- The Internal Revenue Service's effort to scrutinize conservative groups, many bankrolled by "shadow money" from Wall Street to Kansas to Las Vegas, has sparked a political firestorm. But the aftermath may ignite donations to the secretive entities by right-leaning corporations and MOREMay 16, 2013 5:00 AM ET
No one says the President doesn't deserve his benefits. But it's hard to get past his plan to limit savers to half the value of what he'll walk away with.
FORTUNE -- President Obama's proposal to limit the value of 401(k)s, pensions, and other tax-favored retirement accounts to about $3.4 million certainly sounds reasonable. After all, at a time of big budget deficits, we shouldn't subsidize "the rich" with tax breaks, MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - May 1, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Marty Nesbitt forming mid-market private equity firm.
FORTUNE -- One of President Obama's best friends is forming a private equity firm. Insert Mitt Romney's chagrin here.
The pal is Marty Nesbitt, who spent nearly a decade as CEO of Chicago-based airport parking company The Parking Spot (which was sold in December 2011 to Green Courte Partners). According to The Chicago Tribune, his partner will be Kip Kirkpatrick, the co-founder of Water Street Healthcare Partners MOREDan Primack - Jan 22, 2013 12:12 PM ET
President Obama's pick for Treasury Secretary may not be a Wall Streeter's dream, but he's not their worst nightmare either.
FORTUNE -- On the day reports surfaced that Tim Geithner would be nominated for Treasury Secretary back in November 2008, the Dow Jones industrial average surged 494 points. On Wednesday, Obama indicated that he would nominate Jack Lew to replace Geithner. The market shrugged, with most of its modest gains coming MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 10, 2013 8:02 AM ET
A little Democratic idealism mixed with some old-fashioned fiscal discipline could be what Republicans need to get Americans back on their side.
By Sheila Bair, contributor
FORTUNE -- Over the past four years income inequality has worsened, particularly among minority groups. Continuing a long-term trend, the gap between rich and poor is the widest it has been in 40 years. Wealth inequality is even more skewed, with the upper classes enjoying MOREDec 19, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Like three presidents before him, Mitt Romney told the voters what they wanted to hear about taxes. But this time they weren't buying it.
By John Cassidy, contributor
FORTUNE -- Poor Mitt Romney. From the GOP primaries, when members of his own party labeled him a "vulture capitalist," to the start of the campaign proper, when one of his top aides vouchsafed that he would follow an "Etch A Sketch" strategy, MORENov 15, 2012 5:00 AM ET
The shock of more than half a trillion dollars in tax increases and spending cuts could send us into another recession. But with a little stimulus, it might be a blessing, not a curse.
By John Cassidy, contributor
FORTUNE -- With the election almost upon us, Wall Street is starting to focus on the possibility that, come Jan. 1, 2013, the economy could hurtle over a "fiscal cliff" consisting of $600 MOREOct 15, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Jack Welch's hiring history isn't much to tweet about.
FORTUNE -- Jack Welch, the former CEO of General Electric, has attacked the notion that President Obama and his policies are creating jobs. On Friday, Welch in a message sent through Twitter accused the administration, referring to it as "these Chicago guys," of changing the number in the monthly jobs report, which showed that the unemployment rate had fallen to the lowest MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Oct 9, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Wall Street loves a Republican president, right? Not so fast. With history as our judge, the answer is not so clear.
FORTUNE -- One of the questions I get asked these days is whether a win by Mitt Romney or by Barack Obama would be better for the stock market. To which the only honest answer is "I have no earthly idea." Any competent and dispassionate market analyst will tell you MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Sep 19, 2012 5:00 AM ET
|The medical marijuana ad that never aired, despite contrary media headlines|
|2 million students missing out on college aid|
|GM raising Corvette prices|
|China to fight pollution with drones|
|Boeing reports wing cracks on Dreamliners|