By Dan Steinbock
FORTUNE – For years, the market mantra was that emerging markets represented future growth. Lately, however, investors have pulled record levels of capital out of economies from Brazil to India. This is an overreaction; too many investors and analysts are focusing on short-term fluctuations rather than keeping their eye on emerging markets' longer-term prospects.
Though the sell-off has eased, emerging market funds experienced massive outflows soaring to more than $33 billion in the 15 weeks before February, according to Morgan Stanley.
Much of the turmoil has been driven by several events, including Argentina's faltering currency crisis, signs that China's economy is slowing down, as well as longstanding political unrest in Turkey, Ukraine, and Thailand. Investors grew risk averse, betting their money instead on advanced economies and ignoring some not-so-good data from the UK and the US. And the U.S. Federal Reserve's move to reduce its massive bond purchases didn't help either; it contributed to a global sell-off.
MORE: Most Admired Companies
Markets, however, eased this week when the world's major economies, including the U.S., pledged at the Group of 20 meeting that its central banks would be "mindful of impacts" of monetary policy settings, although the U.S. did not indicate any change in the Fed's current policy approach.
Nonetheless, if the volatility resurfaces in the near future, it does not indicate that investors are "returning" to the U.S., European or Japanese markets. Rather, it reflects investors' uncertainty in an era when advanced economies muddling their way amidst debt crises and emerging markets remain poorly understood.
Emerging markets are far from equal; they are diverse, and the problem is that investors tend to wrongly clump them together. In most emerging economies, GDP per capita, adjusted to purchasing power, varies from $2000 to $9,000 (China), or even $16,800 (Russia).
South Korea's GDP per capita, at $32,000, is far higher, above even the European Union's average, as well as other developed economies, including Italy and Spain. In Taiwan, GDP per capita is close to $39,000, which is about the same as in Sweden and Germany and higher than in the UK, Japan and France –not your typical emerging markets.
Even some of the most prestigious investment houses neglect these differences and other critical distinctions. The net effect is that they use highly complicated models to generate projections that have dubious value.
A lot of attention has been given to the so-called "fragile five": India, Indonesia, Brazil, Turkey, and South Africa. Markets have focused on the internal challenges of the fragile five, especially fiscal and current account deficits, falling growth, excessive inflation and political uncertainty. What markets have ignored is that the growth potential of emerging economies is affected by very different regional growth conditions, and different levels of economic development.
Moreover, these countries have been affected by economics factors abroad. Due to ties with the U.S., some have been exposed to "hot money" inflows in the past and the Fed's tapering today. Others have been affected by China's reduced growth prospects and the end of the commodity supercycle.
The real question is why the fragile five should be penalized only now, when many have been coping with structural challenges for quite a while.
Certainly, in the short-term, many face difficult trade-offs, though not necessarily the risk of a full-scale economic crisis. After all, today these economies have sounder banking and financial systems, tolerable debt ratios, flexible exchange rates and large reserves. In the medium- and long-term, they enjoy promising prospects, thanks to solid growth potential.
In the future, emerging economies will drive an increasing share of global growth. But it will not be a smooth ride. The promise of the potential growth is not identical with actual growth. Some countries will gain, others will lose.
However, investors who mistake short-term fluctuations with long-term potential have more to lose.
Dan Steinbock is research director of international business at India China and America Institute and visiting fellow at China-based Shanghai Institutes for International Studies and the Singapore-based EU Center. For more, see http://www.differencegroup.net
The Federal Reserve appears over-optimistic in its economic forecast.
By Mohamed A. El-Erian
FORTUNE -- Last week, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke used a simple car analogy to convey what the central bank may do going forward. Rather than tap the brakes, the Fed would ease a little on the accelerator; and it would do so only if economic conditions strengthened sufficiently.
By distinguishing in this way between the brakes and the accelerator, MOREJun 28, 2013 10:26 AM ET
AQR Capital's Cliff Asness, who runs one of the world's biggest hedge fund firms, says now is not the time to freak out.
FORTUNE -- No black swans here.
That's the opinion of hedge fund manager Cliff Asness, who runs AQR Capital, which is one of the industry's biggest firms with $80 billion under management. The rapid move up in interest rates and the recent 800-point two-day drop in the Dow Jones MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jun 27, 2013 10:51 AM ET
Holding $3.3 trillion in bonds when debt prices are falling might end up costing taxpayers money, or, then again, maybe not.
FORTUNE -- Think your 401(k) has suffered in the stock and bond market rout? Consider the Federal Reserve's recent woe: By Fortune's estimates, the U.S. central bank has lost at least $151 billion in the past seven weeks. And counting.
Economists both inside and out of the Fed have long suspected MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jun 26, 2013 5:00 AM ET
The Fed does not need an economist to run it. Perhaps it needs someone able to meet operating budgets.
By Moshe Silver, Hedgeye
FORTUNE -- Scientists observing bird flight patterns tell us the lead goose in the migratory V-pattern switches back and forth between looking ahead and looking back. It constantly checks the formation behind and adjusts its position to make sure it remains at the point of the flock. Periodically, the lead MOREJun 25, 2013 10:56 AM ET
Yes, yes, people hate the Fed. But believe it or not, they're sort of OK with Ben Bernanke.
So discovered Bloomberg news last week in conducting a poll of a thousand Americans.
Of those surveyed, 39% said they believe the Fed's independence should be reduced and 16% said the central bank should be abolished altogether. Republicans in Congress are talking about eliminating the Fed's statuory responsibility for maintaining employment -- just so MOREColin Barr - Dec 9, 2010 10:09 AM ET
One central bank is sticking to its exit strategy, but hang on tight: Even optimists don't expect the ride to be silky smooth.
China said Friday it will pursue a "prudent" monetary policy next year, after three years of aggressive money printing in the name of counteracting the global economic downturn.
Jokes about the apparent contrast with Fed policy aside, the move shows the world's fastest-growing economy is shuddering at the prospect of MOREColin Barr - Dec 3, 2010 11:43 AM ET
When George Magnus talks, you'd do well to listen.
Magnus, a senior economic adviser for the UBS Investment Bank, was among the few high-profile economists to foresee the global financial crisis. As it unfolded in 2007 he was warning that the world economy faced a "Minsky moment" – the point, named after the writings of the late economist Hyman Minsky, at which massive leverage crumbles under its own weight. As the MOREColin Barr - Dec 3, 2010 6:36 AM ET
Are hopes for a QE2-driven recovery already drifting off course?
They are, economists at Goldman Sachs suggest, thanks to the backlash against the Federal Reserve's pledge to buy $600 billion worth of Treasury securities over eight months.
Goldman is on record saying the first round of quantitative easing won't be nearly big enough to fill in the massive hole that has developed in U.S. demand for goods and services. And with QE2 MOREColin Barr - Nov 22, 2010 6:36 AM ET
There's something about quantitative easing that bothers just about everyone - including, believe it or not, Fed chief Ben Bernanke.
But in contrast to his many critics, Bernanke's problem lies not with the policy itself, in which the Federal Reserve has pledged to buy $600 billion worth of Treasury bonds over eight months in its latest bid to bring down interest rates and stimulate the economy.
No, Bernanke's beef is that what MOREColin Barr - Nov 19, 2010 10:58 AM ET
|The Deep Web you don't know about|
|Pizza chain Sbarro files for bankruptcy|
|Colorado gets $2 million from marijuana taxes|
|Shodan: The scariest search engine on the Internet|
|Invest $1 million, try for a U.S. green card|