By John Cassidy, contributor
FORTUNE -- With the election almost upon us, Wall Street is starting to focus on the possibility that, come Jan. 1, 2013, the economy could hurtle over a "fiscal cliff" consisting of $600 billion in tax increases and spending cuts. It's hard not to be concerned. The Congressional Budget Office and Ben Bernanke have warned that this shock -- a result of the Bush tax cuts and the Obama payroll tax reductions expiring at the same time that automatic spending cuts are imposed -- could well plunge the economy into another recession. But before we all panic and agree to another meaningless short-term fix, such as the one that some senators from both parties are reportedly discussing, let's consider another possibility. Crazy as it might sound, the expiration of the tax cuts could turn out to be a blessing in disguise.
For years, Democrats and Republicans have been arguing about how to reduce the enormous budget deficits that have emerged partly as a consequence of the Great Recession. Over the next decade, both sides agree, we need about $4 trillion to $5 trillion in spending cuts and revenue increases. But nobody can agree on how to do the split -- particularly how to raise federal revenue, now less than 16% of GDP, the lowest level since the early 1950s. President Obama and the Democrats refuse to consider tax hikes on anybody earning less than $250,000 a year. Republicans in Congress refuse to countenance any hikes at all.
Allowing the tax cuts to expire on schedule potentially provides a way out of the impasse. According to Bill Gale of the Brookings Institution, who supports the idea, it would raise about $2.8 trillion over the next 10 years -- more than enough to help bring down the deficit and stabilize the ratio of federal debt to GDP, a key indicator of long-term financial stability. "Going over the cliff is the only way to get the economy on a good long-term budget path with a deficit-reduction package that balances revenue increases and spending cuts," Gale wrote in a recent article for the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. Another cool thing about Gale's approach: It wouldn't require a single vote on Capitol Hill. If the lame-duck Congress does nothing at all when it meets after the election, the tax increases and spending cuts will go into effect on Jan. 1 -- and the threat of the U.S. eventually encountering a Europe-style debt crisis will be greatly reduced.
Now, as Milton Friedman taught us, there's no such thing as a free lunch. With the introduction of tax hikes and spending cuts, the threat of another recession early in 2013 would be very real. According to the CBO, the economy would contract at an annual rate of 1.3% in the first six months of next year. If Americans decide that the folks in Washington have lost it, and the markets panic, the outcome could be even worse. But there could also be a much better outcome. The next administration -- a reelected Obama administration, presumably -- could explain that it was merely reversing a set of policies that has put the U.S. on the road to ruin. Wall Street would be receptive. And -- this is key -- the administration could propose another short-term stimulus package to offset some of the hit to demand. Come late January, when the next Congress arrives in Washington, Democrats would be looking to roll back the tax hikes on the poor, and Republicans would be seeking to reverse higher levies on dividends and capital gains. Some targeted spending increases could also be discussed. In a debate about cutting taxes rather than raising them, a compromise would be likely, allowing a stimulus bill to be passed.
Admittedly, the idea of increasing taxes at the end of December only to cut them again in February or March takes a bit of getting used to. But as long as the new stimulus is relatively modest and temporary, it would all make perfect sense. The long-term fiscal outlook would be transformed, and the threat of a recession would be greatly reduced. In a dysfunctional political system such as ours, it sometimes takes unorthodox tactics to get important things done. This is one of those times. Bring on the fiscal cliff!
This story is from the October 29, 2012 issue of Fortune.
Obama and Romney each have a plan to lift Middle America from its rut, but election-year promises aren't going to fix an issue that's been brewing for decades.
By Geoff Colvin, senior editor-at-large
FORTUNE -- President Obama likes to say, "The 2012 election is a make-or-break moment for the middle class." He's mistaken -- it isn't. Mitt Romney likes to say, "This President and his policies have made it harder on the American MOREMar 30, 2012 5:00 AM ET
CEO Vikram Pandit discusses potential in emerging markets, the dark days of 2009 -- and his willingness to talk with Occupy Wall Street.
FORTUNE -- Next year, Citigroup will reach a historic milestone: its 200th birthday. That makes it one of the oldest banks in the country and, fittingly for an enterprise established two days before Congress declared war against the British in 1812, one that has survived many a crisis. In MOREOct 24, 2011 5:00 AM ET
Two years after the recession ended, U.S. workers still face a grim job market. And with tepid economic growth and an election year breeding uncertainty, companies are likely to have the upper hand for some time.
By Katherine Reynolds Lewis, contributor
FORTUNE -- It's a tough time to celebrate the American worker. This coming Monday marks the third consecutive Labor Day with an unemployment rate topping 9% and 14 million Americans looking for work. MORESep 2, 2011 5:00 AM ET
It's been a tough slog coming out of the Great Recession. As for a double dip, consider this: We've had only three in 160 years. Here's a look at how this recovery compares with recessions past.
By Nicolas Rapp and Katie Benner
Reporter associate: Doris Burke
Note: Recovery of GDP growth rates is based on real GDP adjusted for inflation. Employment is seasonally adjusted.
Sources: Bureau of Economic Research; Bureau of Economic Analysis; Bureau MOREAug 18, 2011 5:00 AM ET
Economists say the odds are against a double dip recession, but remember 2008? They've been very wrong before.
By Mina Kimes, writer
FORTUNE -- As stocks took a blistering dive this week, Wall Street economists scrambled to readjust their forecasts of the likelihood that the economy is headed for another recession. In a matter of days, a consensus quickly emerged: Most strategists now place the odds of a double dip at 30-40%.
Goldman MOREAug 12, 2011 5:00 AM ET
Friday's jobs numbers were a welcome relief, but there's no guarantee it's anything but temporary.
FORTUNE -- Phew! After the spate of bad economic data that propelled fears that the U.S. could soon slip back into an economic recession, today's monthly report on the state of the jobs market has given us a sign – albeit a modest one – that things might not be as bad as we thought.
The unemployment MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Aug 5, 2011 11:10 AM ET
Did the U.S. economic expansion wilt this past spring, allowing another recession to take root?
Gluskin Sheff economist David Rosenberg believes it did. It isn't just that the unemployment rate bottomed out in March at 8.8%. Rosenberg notes that real disposable income, household employment, real business sales and manufacturing output all peaked that month.
Skepticism about U.S. growth is catching lately, what with Goldman Sachs and Bank of America both cutting their MOREColin Barr - Jul 18, 2011 2:16 PM ET
A recession is "clearly a possibility," the bank that until recently was America's biggest booster said in cutting its economic growth forecasts yet again.
Goldman Sachs, which just seven months ago was the loudest voice for a stronger than expected U.S. recovery, now expects U.S. output to creep ahead at a snaillike 1.5% clip in the second quarter and a less than vigorous 2% in the third.
Friday's call stands as quite a comedown MOREColin Barr - Jul 18, 2011 6:38 AM ET
Another recession is coming, and soon.
So says Gluskin Sheff economist David Rosenberg. Rosenberg, a longtime bear on the economy and the stock market, now says he is 99% sure we will have another recession by the end of next year.
He reasons that consumers have just begun clearing debt from their ledgers (see chart, right) and that as that deflationary process plays out, spending will slow, weighing on job growth. Adding MOREColin Barr - Jun 14, 2011 10:34 AM ET
|Yahoo to buy Tumblr for $1.1 billion: Report|
|Stocks on a roll: Yahoo, Microsoft stoke appetite|
|5 reasons why Yahoo is making a $1.1 billion mistake|
|Prison exclusive: Bernie Madoff can't sleep|
|My very cheap day|