FORTUNE -- On Thursday, we received more evidence that the economy is broken.
The government said GDP rose 3.2% in the last three months of 2013 -- one of the fastest rates since the end of the recession, though slower than the third quarter's 4.1%. Still, that sounds good, until you remember this: Employers only added 74,000 jobs in December -- one of the worst months in nearly three years. Stronger economic growth is supposed to equal more jobs. So what gives?
It does appear that the normal relationship between jobs and GDP has broken down. In the first half of 2013, for instance, GDP growth was at 1.9% and employers added an average of 195,000 jobs a month. In the second half of the year, GDP picked up to 3.6%, but the rate of job growth slowed to 170,000.
Over the past decade, on average, a one percentage point change in GDP has translated to about 115,000 more, or fewer, jobs. But the number jumps around a lot. And there are some things that do tend to disrupt the relationship.
Immediately after a recession, strong GDP growth doesn't tend to produce the same level of job growth as usual. That's because GDP at that moment is rebounding rather than growing. What's more, employers are slow to hire after a recession. That's what happened in 2010 and 2011. But we are now four years out of the most recent recession, so it's odd that the relationship hasn't returned to normal.
Hours and productivity can mess with the GDP-to-jobs equation. As hours and productivity go up, employers can make more money with the same number, or fewer, workers. But the average work week has not grown much recently and productivity, after growing rapidly in the 1990s and then right after the recession, has been flat-lining as well.
What's going on?
Most of the economists I talked to shrugged it off. It's mostly a short-term problem, they said. Most people think December's jobs number represented a temporary slowdown, perhaps caused by the cold weather. Job growth will rebound in January, they say. If that happens, the GDP-to-jobs number will look more normal. For all of 2013, the ratio of jobs to GDP growth was 88,000. So we're not that far off the 115,000 average when you look at the whole year, even if recently the number has been more like 50,000.
But I don't think you can completely write off this trend. Yes, December's jobs number was perhaps worse than it should have been, and it may very well be revised up. But it will not be revised to a figure like 300,000, even after adjusting for the weather. The fact of the matter is the job market is still slow. And at least part of this has to do with the fact that the mechanism we have used to turn economic growth into jobs is not working as well as it used to.
The lack of lending by the big banks may very well be one contributing factor. Another theory: Companies have gotten greater rates of return investing in capital in the past decade or so than they have in putting the money into hiring more workers. That's led companies to believe that the best use of their money is to plow it into technology or buying back their own stock. But, as recent productivity numbers show, the benefits from those investments are falling. Corporations don't seem to have noticed that yet.
Whatever the reason, Thursday's GDP numbers suggest that even if the overall economy is back, the labor market could still lag for a while.
If the investment bank was beaten by Washington, it didn't lose by much.
FORTUNE -- Goldman Sachs' announcement last week that its fourth-quarter earnings fell 19% from a year ago was greeted as a watershed moment.
New York magazine suggested Goldman (GS) bankers switch from Dom to André. The New York Times called Goldman wary, with a key unit in continued decline and facing uncertain regulations. Politico took the occasion to MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 21, 2014 12:57 PM ET
As rent rates rise and incomes remain stagnant, Americans are feeling the squeeze.Nin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Dec 10, 2013 11:03 AM ET
Some worry that United States is destined to become a nation of part-timers, but a new report suggests that the growth in part-time work is only a temporary symptom of a slow economic recovery.Nin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Oct 9, 2013 10:47 AM ET
The shock of more than half a trillion dollars in tax increases and spending cuts could send us into another recession. But with a little stimulus, it might be a blessing, not a curse.
By John Cassidy, contributor
FORTUNE -- With the election almost upon us, Wall Street is starting to focus on the possibility that, come Jan. 1, 2013, the economy could hurtle over a "fiscal cliff" consisting of $600 MOREOct 15, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Obama and Romney each have a plan to lift Middle America from its rut, but election-year promises aren't going to fix an issue that's been brewing for decades.
By Geoff Colvin, senior editor-at-large
FORTUNE -- President Obama likes to say, "The 2012 election is a make-or-break moment for the middle class." He's mistaken -- it isn't. Mitt Romney likes to say, "This President and his policies have made it harder on the American MOREMar 30, 2012 5:00 AM ET
CEO Vikram Pandit discusses potential in emerging markets, the dark days of 2009 -- and his willingness to talk with Occupy Wall Street.
FORTUNE -- Next year, Citigroup will reach a historic milestone: its 200th birthday. That makes it one of the oldest banks in the country and, fittingly for an enterprise established two days before Congress declared war against the British in 1812, one that has survived many a crisis. In MOREOct 24, 2011 5:00 AM ET
Two years after the recession ended, U.S. workers still face a grim job market. And with tepid economic growth and an election year breeding uncertainty, companies are likely to have the upper hand for some time.
By Katherine Reynolds Lewis, contributor
FORTUNE -- It's a tough time to celebrate the American worker. This coming Monday marks the third consecutive Labor Day with an unemployment rate topping 9% and 14 million Americans looking for work. MORESep 2, 2011 5:00 AM ET
It's been a tough slog coming out of the Great Recession. As for a double dip, consider this: We've had only three in 160 years. Here's a look at how this recovery compares with recessions past.
By Nicolas Rapp and Katie Benner
Reporter associate: Doris Burke
Note: Recovery of GDP growth rates is based on real GDP adjusted for inflation. Employment is seasonally adjusted.
Sources: Bureau of Economic Research; Bureau of Economic Analysis; Bureau MOREAug 18, 2011 5:00 AM ET
Economists say the odds are against a double dip recession, but remember 2008? They've been very wrong before.
By Mina Kimes, writer
FORTUNE -- As stocks took a blistering dive this week, Wall Street economists scrambled to readjust their forecasts of the likelihood that the economy is headed for another recession. In a matter of days, a consensus quickly emerged: Most strategists now place the odds of a double dip at 30-40%.
Goldman MOREAug 12, 2011 5:00 AM ET
|NJ agrees to ban Tesla direct sales|
|West prepares sanctions against Russia over Ukraine|
|Inside the underground sex economy|
|Five predictions for the World Wide Web that were way, way, way off|
|The Deep Web you don't know about|