FORTUNE -- Sit down, take a deep breath, and prepare to be surprised. Ready? Okay. I'm going to say something nice about the federal government. Two separate parts of it, in fact, each of which has come up with a simple, smart, and imaginative idea.
Would you believe they're the Treasury and the U.S. Postal Service? You should, because it's true.
The Treasury's idea, which allowed President Obama to create Roth retirement accounts that workers will be able to open with only $25, affects more people, so we'll deal with it first. How can Obama establish these accounts on his own? Because the Treasury invented a new kind of U.S. savings bond.
This bond, which will be issued late this year, will carry the same rate as the G Fund in the federal employee Thrift Savings Plan. The G Fund is the equivalent of a money-market fund, but its yield, adjusted monthly, is based on the Treasury's average borrowing cost, rather than on short-term rates, as money funds are. Hence, the G Fund's March yield is 2.25%, about 200 times as high as today's typical Treasury money fund.
I'm a big fan of offering small savers retirement accounts that won't eat them alive with fees. And who knows? When details of this fee-free plan emerge later this year, with luck kids who have paying jobs will be able to open one of these accounts at work -- a good life lesson. The only thing I don't like is the plan's too-cutesy name, myRA. Which rhymes with Ira, as in IRA. Then again, what do I know from marketing?
You'll never get rich off these accounts, but at least you don't have to worry about them losing value, as you do about bond or stock investments. That's because they're federally guaranteed money-market funds.
These small accounts are of little or no interest to brokerage or fund companies. They max out at $15,000, and as Roth IRAs, they aren't available to high-income types who would love to earn 2.25% in a tax-deferred money-fund account. Smart security, smart limitations on it.
I can't offer kudos to the creator of the G Fund savings bond because the Treasury wouldn't tell me who it is. But I can tell you who came up with the Postal Service's idea: Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe. His idea, available at post offices all over the country, is a play on the most famous misprint in U.S. philatelic history: the Inverted Jenny. That 24¢ issue, released in 1918, celebrated the nation's first airmail flight and carried the picture of a Curtiss JN-4H biplane. (Why the post office wanted to celebrate this particular event isn't clear: The pilot got lost, flew in the wrong direction, and crashed.) Some of the stamps were printed with the plane upside down, hence the name Inverted Jenny. One misprinted 100-stamp sheet escaped into the world, where it made its way to a Wall Street family that came up with the brilliant idea of separating it into pieces, which turned out to be worth more than the sheet was. Like today's practice of carving bonds into tranches. Very clever.
To stir up interest in stamp collecting -- and to make a few bucks -- the Postal Service in September began selling 2.2 million six-stamp sheets of $2 Jennys flying upside down. Then in a bit of playfulness, the post office also misprinted the misprint, issuing only 100 sheets of right-side-up Jennys. So what had been the ordinary stamp in 1918 is now the rare one. The Postal Service won't say how many Jennys have been sold. Regardless, they're a small windfall for the Postal Service, free publicity in the stamp world -- and fun.
One more thing. The stamp was dedicated at the William H. Gross Gallery at the Postal Museum in Washington, D.C. Yes, that's Pimco's Bill Gross, a.k.a. the king of bonds, whose realm is having some problems these days but whose regal status in the world of stamp collecting is unchallenged.
Bill Gross trading pieces of paper with glue (or today, self-stick adhesive) on them in addition to trading bonds amuses me. And I just love the two ideas. Positive columns aren't my normal stock in trade, but they have their moments. This is one of them.
This story is from the April 7, 2014 issue of Fortune.
People are living longer. So how much should you sock away?
By Jean Chatzky
FORTUNE -- The most frightening billboard I saw in recent months ran along the Westside Highway in Manhattan. From the good folks at Prudential, it read: The First Person To Live To 150 Is Alive Today, with the subhead, Plan For A Longer Retirement. A few weeks later, our sister publication, Time Magazine, followed in tandem, asking the question on its MOREFeb 26, 2014 10:00 AM ET
President Obama's proposal is well-intentioned but may not get workers to save more. A better plan: Automatically enroll workers to an IRA.
By Robert C. Pozen
FORTUNE -- President Obama recently proposed to help more workers save for retirement through an executive order creating the myRA. The plan is being billed as the Roth IRA for every man or woman with neither access to a 401(k) plan at their workplace nor MOREFeb 21, 2014 9:06 AM ET
Under the president's plan, myRA retirement accounts would be available to U.S. workers who don't have access to a 401(k) plan.
By Jean Chatzky
FORTUNE -- In last week's State of the Union address, President Obama introduced the myRA (pronounced My-R-A, like I-R-A, not Myra, like your great aunt). It's yet another retirement account to add to the likes of 401(k)s, Roth IRAs, and SIMPLEs -- only this one is geared MOREFeb 3, 2014 11:29 AM ET
Know your risk tolerance and threshold for pain.
By Jean Chatzky
FORTUNE -- Alison Levine is tougher than she looks. At 5'4", 110 lbs, she's not the person you'd pull out of a crowd if you were looking for someone who's tackled the so-called Adventure Grand Slam, which consists of climbing the highest peaks on all seven continents as well as skiing to both the North and South Poles. Investing -- MOREJan 21, 2014 5:00 AM ET
Conventional wisdom says to hold out on Social Security benefits until you're 70 and can maximize your payout. That's not always the best case.
By Jean Chatzky
FORTUNE -- Would you leave $180,000 on the table? How about $323,000? No, I'm not smoking anything. And I'm not kidding either. Those are the average amounts forsaken by singles and couples respectively who take Social Security at age 62 rather than waiting (until age 70 MOREJan 14, 2014 10:12 AM ET
It's very possible you won't spend as much in retirement as you think.
By Jean Chatzky
FORTUNE -- Are you saving too much for retirement? Can you believe I'm even asking that question?
Full disclosure: The folks at Morningstar Investment Management, specifically head of retirement research David Blanchett, asked it first. He found that for many people the answer is yes -- by an average of 20%. That, as Blanchett acknowledges, is MOREJan 6, 2014 5:00 AM ET
If you wait until 70 to collect and live to your mid-eighties, you win big. But who says you'll make it that far?
FORTUNE -- Year-end festivities are approaching, with Hanukkah lights nearing their peak, Christmas lights going up, and the New Year's celebration almost upon us. So what better time than the season of light is there to talk about ... mortality?
No, I'm not raising this gloomy topic just to be MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Dec 4, 2013 5:00 AM ET
It turns out that Americans in their sixties today have it better than any generation before them, but generations ahead have a less certain future.
FORTUNE – When the nation's financial system almost crashed back in 2008, it's easy to see why anyone approaching retirement would have panicked. They saw their lifelong savings plummet as home and stock prices spiraled. For 60-somethings, it seemed there wouldn't be enough time to make MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - May 20, 2013 5:00 AM ET
If it's fair to limit taxpayers' expense for retirement money being set aside by "the rich," it's vastly more fair to limit taxpayers' expense for Obama's own package.
FORTUNE -- It's a lot of fun to be able to make what you think are clear, simple points about the difference between what people in power propose for the likes of you and me, and what they get for themselves.
But every once MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - May 10, 2013 5:00 AM ET
|Water becoming more valuable than gold|
|Don't assume you're safe from Heartbleed|
|Will 7 Apples a day keep the bears away? - The Buzz|
|Russia stocks fall as Ukraine crisis intensifies|
|Postal workers protest Staples|