A new arrest at an SAC fund brings the government closer to Steve Cohen's door. Now might be a good time to become a family office in order to avoid future scrutiny.
FORTUNE -- The past few days haven't been kind to Steve Cohen, founder of the mega-hedge fund SAC Capital.
On Thursday, a judge decided not to approve his firm's settlement of insider trading charges with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
A day later, Michael Steinberg, a top portfolio manager at an SAC fund, was arrested and charged with securities fraud. The criminal indictment reignited speculation that the government is trying to nail Cohen for insider trading, and it forced the firm to yet again remind the world that Cohen is innocent until proven otherwise.
"Steve Cohen has not been charged with any wrongdoing and has done nothing wrong," a spokesman for SAC said.
Be that as it may, investors seem concerned about the ongoing government investigations at SAC and the fact that arrests of current and former employees have averaged about one a quarter for the past few years. In February, a source close to SAC told CNNMoney and others that it lost about $1.7 billion to redemptions. A month earlier, SAC was expecting redemptions of just $1 billion.
Investors left despite the fact that Cohen is still making money. His firm gained about 13% in 2012, and this year it's up more than 4% as of mid-March, according to a person close to the firm. And another round of redemptions is expected in May.
The client defections mean that about 70% of SAC's assets under management come from within the firm, and the bulk of that amount is Cohen's own capital. Given these numbers, one wonders why the billionaire hedge fund manager doesn't just return money to investors and run SAC as a so-called family office.
Such a move could lessen the public scrutiny on Cohen, says Ron Geffner, a partner at law firm Sadis & Goldberg who specializes in structuring, organizing. and counseling hedge funds and other investment advisors. "A manager who returns money and is no longer accepting new investments theoretically has no obligation to communicate any factual information regarding ongoing investigations," he says.
With the government continuing to probe SAC and related hedge funds, Cohen has reportedly discussed these matters on group calls and in private conversations with his investors. That has fanned worries that the insider trading investigations could be a distraction for portfolio managers at SAC.
And it's possible that ongoing investigations could deeply damage Cohen's firm and reputation, even if he is never found guilty. Pequot Capital, which like SAC had reached $15 billion in assets under management, shuttered in 2009 amid years of insider trading probes. "Public disclosures about the continuing investigation have cast a cloud over the firm and have become a source of personal distraction," Pequot founder Arthur Samburg wrote in a letter to investors. "I have concluded that Pequot can no longer stay in business." Samburg, who settled with the government, was never found guilty of insider trading.
Many high profile managers have recently closed funds to outside investors, including George Soros, Stanley Druckenmiller, and Carl Icahn. While none of them were under investigation, each felt that the world had changed dramatically -- new regulations, saturated markets, a radically different hedge fund landscape -- and that those changes made it too difficult to operate as they once had.
Of course, turning SAC into a family office doesn't mean that prosecutors can't still try to take assets from employees or investors. "The government can try to claw back profits if they deem that they were gained through violative activity," says Geffner.
And Cohen's dilemma is far different from that of a Soros and Druckenmiller. By closing their firms, they no longer had to deal with the things that made running a hedge fund difficult. With or without outside money, regulators will still be eyeing Cohen and his firm.
So while turning SAC into a family office could help in some respects, one attorney said that it would be sending the wrong message. If Cohen is innocent, he should continue to accept money from outside investors. "Why should the terms of his firm be dictated by others?" says Stuart Slotnick, a securities lawyer who specializes in white collar crime. "Notwithstanding all the rumor and innuendo, he's still running a successful business."
Silicon Valley's hottest non-consumer startup keeps getting richer.
TechCrunch yesterday reported that Palantir Technologies, a Silicon Valley-based provider of analytics platforms for financial and intelligence clients, has raised $70 million in Series F funding. From the post:
"While the company declined to reveal the valuation in the round, we've learned from sources that it is around $2.5 billion. Two unnamed New York-based hedge funds anchored the round, and multiple early investors and university endowments MOREDan Primack - Oct 7, 2011 10:45 AM ET
Senator Charles Grassley gave regulators more time to reveal details into whether they're miserably failing when it comes to investigating SAC Capital, or merely fumbling the ball. And the SEC didn't want to comply with that?
FORTUNE -- The Securities and Exchange Commission let Senator Charles Grassley know that the office will not be giving him any information regarding how regulators have handled referrals related to possibly suspicious trading at SAC MOREKatie Benner - Jun 10, 2011 1:14 PM ET
* What did SAC Capital know, and when did it know it? SEC investigates MedImmune trades from 2007.
* Paul Hyman: Why has H1-B visa demand plummeted?
* Dave Sekera: Is Japan next on the credit downgrade list?
* Morning Call: U.S. futures point lower, London falls early, European shares retreat and the Nikkei climbs.
* Ben Parr: Microsoft's Steve Ballmer conundrum
* Fred Wilson: Enough is enough on software patents
* Survey says: Most Americans still believe the country MOREDan Primack - Jun 1, 2011 7:25 AM ET
How would YOU defend yourself from insider trading charges? You can go the Raj Rajaratnam route or the Steve Cohen one. I'd take the latter.
If a man is known by the company he keeps (or has kept), then these are tough times, reputationally speaking, for hedge fund kingpins Raj Rajaratnam and Steve Cohen. While neither has been convicted of a crime, hardly a day goes by in which we MOREDuff McDonald, Contributing Editor - Feb 2, 2011 11:10 AM ET
The consultant at the center of the FBI's insider trading probe has grabbed the microphone and won't let go. Is it an amateur move? Or a brilliant one?
Sometimes, it's difficult to figure out the motive behind people's actions. Take Julian Assange, for example. Is he actually an anarchist? Or just a wannabe playboy? It's hard to say. Maybe he's both.
Then there's John Kinnucan, heretofore-unknown technology researcher and current toast MOREDuff McDonald, Contributing Editor - Dec 10, 2010 5:00 AM ET
Although the insider trading investigation is still in early stages, some fund managers are already positioning their firms to attract new clients from its wreckage.
By Cyrus Sanati, contributor
Think the insider trading probe is bad for all hedge funds? Think again.
With the latest investigation centering on providers of research to hedge funds, some managers of quantitative funds, which rely solely on computer algorithms for trading ideas, are hoping to cash in MOREDec 6, 2010 12:48 PM ET
|McDonald's gives Charles Ramsey free food for a year|
|The 'chicken poop' credit and other bad tax breaks|
|Doomsday investors betting on market crash|
|Another downer day on Wall Street|
|Want to invest in Samsung? Good luck!|