Sequester

This country needs another financial crisis

May 22, 2013: 5:00 AM ET

No one wants to go back to the brink, but honestly, what have our nation's leaders learned since the last near-collapse?

financial crisis

FORTUNE -- Almost a century ago Thomas Marshall, Woodrow Wilson's Vice President, got tired of listening to senators blather on about the nation's needs and uttered the words that made him immortal: "What this country needs is a good five-cent cigar." Today, with 24/7 blathering as our national political pastime, let me adapt Marshall's 1917 remark: What this country needs to get its act together is a good five-alarm financial crisis.

I mean, look around. Except for the Federal Reserve, which has consistently tried to help the economy, misguided though some of its actions may be, about the only real changes our government has made since the onset of the financial crisis were induced by fear. The Troubled Asset Relief Program, which played a vital role in restoring confidence and stability to the financial system, was passed only because the House's rejection of it on Sept. 28, 2008, set off a 778-point plummet in the Dow. That scared the House into reversing itself.

The only parts of the budget sequester -- an exercise in economic idiocy -- that have been modified are the FAA's cutbacks that caused air-travel delays bad enough to scare politicians into action and the food inspectors who were rescued after the meat and poultry industry spoke out in support of them. The sequester, remember, was a doomsday device created to resolve the debt-ceiling crisis in 2011, on the assumption that sequestration was so stupid and damaging that people would do anything to keep it at bay. Yet here it is.

MORE: An unexpected bright spot for unions

Now, for the third time in two years, we're dealing with a debt-ceiling drama. The previous two times Republicans played this game -- the summer of 2011 and year-end 2012 -- they damaged the country's financial credibility for no discernible gain to themselves. Why they think the third time will be the charm is beyond me. I blame the Republicans (my former party) more than I blame the Democrats (my previous former party) for our national gridlock. But the Democrats are no prizes either.

Take the budget deficit, which is shrinking rapidly. Many Democrats are declaring victory, saying that everything is heading in the right direction; there's no need to cut the growth of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid; it's all under control. But if you read the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's recent analysis, you see that everything is far from fine for the long term.

Part of the deficit decline comes from the higher tax rates that went into effect this year, and part from the economy's growth. But a good part of the shrinkage is from one-time items that will disappear, such as an increase in this year's income-tax collections because companies accelerated some 2013 dividends and bonuses into last year so recipients could avoid the Jan. 1 tax increases. Another factor is the lower-than-previously-projected interest rates on the national debt. But they won't last indefinitely, because the Fed has already begun warning markets of future rate increases.

I had expected our leaders to have rational conversations after the poisonous 2012 elections were over. I was naive. The Democrats, scenting blood, pretended to reach out to Republicans, but really didn't. Now, smelling blood over Benghazi, the IRS, and media phone records, Republicans aren't even pretending to be playing nice.

MORE: Don't worry about today's retirees

Calm down, you say. Stocks are at all-time highs, house prices have recovered, and corporate profits are strong. What could possibly cause a crisis?

For starters, we still have too-big-to-fail banks that depend on short-term financial markets, which could dry up in an instant, as in 2008-09. Some, including my Fortune colleague Sheila Bair, think the government now has the tools to deal with this. I respectfully disagree.

The debt-ceiling question, supposedly on hold until September, has disaster potential too. If we slip over the brink this time, it could spook foreign buyers, run interest rates way up, run stocks down, and spark a financial panic.

I don't want to see a crisis, and I hope our alleged leaders, who aren't stupid, bestir themselves before one strikes. But I sure wouldn't count on it. Too bad for them. Too bad for us.

This story is from the June 10, 2013 issue of Fortune.

  • Airport furloughs will only worsen our economy

    By allowing funding cuts to hit our aviation system, Washington is actively making our economy and our country worse. Don't believe for a second that Obama and Congress were powerless to avoid this.

    By Andy Serwer, managing editor

    FORTUNE -- Washington has finally lost its collective mind. I'm not talking about the defeated gun bill (which 90% of Americans supported) or any other spineless behavior. I'm talking about our elected officials MORE

    Apr 23, 2013 11:07 AM ET
  • Can states save us from sequester doom?

    Just as $85 billion worth of sequester cuts kick in, some states are seeing budget surpluses for the first time in years.

    FORTUNE -- This week, Congress began focusing on a March 27 deadline to adopt a new spending bill or else face a government shutdown. As lawmakers painstakingly negotiate a deal, they may try to scale back the sequester cuts that kicked in on Friday.

    The $85 billion worth of cuts MORE

    - Mar 5, 2013 9:45 AM ET
  • El-Erian: 6 reasons why the sequester hurts

    Rather than be shocked into comprehensive action, look for Congress to come up with some temporary Band Aid for the sequester. While better than doing nothing, this is not a great solution.

    By Mohamed El-Erian

    FORTUNE -- My short trip to Europe this week served as a vivid reminder of how accustomed we have become in America to Congressional dysfunction. Back on U.S. soil, it took just a few minutes of listening MORE

    Mar 1, 2013 9:43 AM ET
  • Why the stock market will yawn at the sequester

    Profits have been relatively resilient during the decline in government spending over the past few years. Can that continue with the massive cuts coming?

    FORTUNE -- Despite all the doomsday-like scenarios we've heard that budget cuts could wreak havoc on the U.S. economy, investors won't likely sweat it – at least not in the short-term.

    To be sure, the cuts are indeed very deep. If Congress fails to strike a budget deal MORE

    - Feb 27, 2013 11:23 AM ET
  • Chuck Schumer: Sequester shows we're 'tough'

    The petty politics of macho.

    FORTUNE -- We're just three days away from the looming sequester, and Sen. Chuck Schumer apparently believes it's fait accompli. Not because it's good policy, or because Congress and President Obama have just run out of time to draft a reasonable solution. No,  it's because both political parties need to flex their muscles.

    Here is the relevant hearsay, as recounted this morning by Apollo Global Management (APO) MORE

    - Feb 26, 2013 4:00 PM ET
Current Issue
  • Give the gift of Fortune
  • Get the Fortune app
  • Subscribe
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.