By Sanjay Sanghoee
FORTUNE -- Shortly after Facebook's recent announcement of a new public offering worth $1.5 billion, for which Mark Zuckerberg provided 60% of the shares, Facebook stock fell amidst concerns that it is overvalued. The shares rebounded on optimism about social media, but it is a safe bet that such doubts will continue to plague the company in 2014.
But the market may be missing the bigger picture.
In terms of the new offering and particularly Zuckerberg's role in it, even visionary founders are entitled to monetize their ownership over time, and so this may not be a signal of anything sinister. Besides, the shares being sold by Zuckerberg account for only 10% of his holdings in Facebook (FB) and only 2.5% of the voting power, so the impact to his control will be minimal.
Analysts have also questioned why Facebook would finance its capital needs via equity instead of debt. While it is true that debt is cheaper than equity, especially in a low interest rate environment, debt also comes at a cost, which can sometimes outstrip that of equity. While Facebook is currently cash rich with $3.1 billion of cash and equivalents sitting on its balance sheet vs. only $575 million of debt (not to mention $1.6 billion of operating income through the third quarter of 2013), debt can quickly become a burden on the company during leaner times. More importantly, even though banks might happily lend the company money, they will impose restrictions on future strategic moves and experimental projects that Facebook may consider crucial to its growth. Such restrictions are particularly onerous for technology companies that need to innovate quickly to meet the changing demands of consumers.
Finally, the fundamentals. What bearish investors are missing about Facebook is that the power of the company's social media platform does not lie in its immediate profit potential but in its formidable reach and addictive nature. With 1.19 billion users, Facebook reaches 17% of the entire world's population, a fact that positions the company as probably the most powerful medium of the new millennium, and while its popularity with teens may have declined somewhat, it remains and will remain in the foreseeable future, the Match.com of social media.
Its ad-delivery engine is excellent, and the company has managed to crack the $9.6 billion mobile advertising market (the company makes half its revenues through ads to the 500 million people who check Facebook on their phones every day). While Facebook has faced intense criticism because of its track record on privacy, the reality is that what the data mining the company has been doing (officially or unofficially) is enabling it to enhance its user experience constantly. What all this means is that the stock contains a lot of potential that remains to be tapped, and should remain attractive to value investors.
Investors are welcome to question the company's motives for selling new shares (my best guess is that Zuckerberg wants to pump more money into exploring new technologies à la Google (GOOG) and into enhancing the mobile experience to increase its ad revenues from that side) as well as its valuation, but they should also remember that Facebook stock fell nearly 50% after its botched IPO and has had to rise from (arguably) an artificially low baseline – making the likelihood of overvaluation even more remote.
So for investors who are willing to weather temporary doubts and hold a great asset, there will be plenty to "Like" about the stock in 2014.
Sanjay Sanghoee is a political and business commentator. He has worked at investment banks Lazard Freres and Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein. He does not own Facebook shares.
Snapchat turned down a $3 billion buyout offer from Facebook. And that's okay.
FORTUNE -- When word came last month that Snapchat had turned down an acquisition offer from Facebook (FB), I wrote the following in the Term Sheet email:
Most interesting is the question of how Facebook's interest is impacting Snapchat's plan to raise new capital at a big valuation (a deal that likely will include more founder liquidity). One theory MOREDan Primack - Nov 13, 2013 2:33 PM ET
The social media company uses estimates to determine some of its revenue.
FORTUNE -- Twitter changed and expanded the description of how it tallies sales from some of its advertising deals in its IPO filings.
The first version of its IPO filing, or S-1, which it confidentially filed to the SEC in July but did not initially release to the public, implied Twitter did not have a consistent policy to determine how MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Oct 14, 2013 9:16 AM ET
The social media darling's first substantive public filing paints a picture of a somewhat troubled and deeply unprofitable digital media company with lackluster growth and an exploding cost base.
By Cyrus Sanati
FORTUNE -- It now makes sense why Twitter initially filed its IPO in secret -- its books aren't pretty.
The social media darling's first substantive public filing paints a picture of a somewhat troubled and deeply unprofitable digital media company MOREOct 4, 2013 9:43 AM ET
Sure, young adults are more cash-strapped than ever. But the bigger problem is that they just don't think driving is cool -- or even necessary -- anymore.
FORTUNE – When Japanese carmaker Honda launched a boxy SUV called the Element in 2002, it hoped to draw outdoorsy twenty-something buyers. The vehicle sported a sunroof in the backseat -- room for your surfboard. The trunk was plenty spacious, big enough to haul MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Aug 16, 2013 8:49 AM ET
At Fortune's Global Forum, JPMorgan's CEO said markets will be "scary" until a normal interest rate environment returns.
By Megan Barnett
FORTUNE -- It's going to be scary out there in the markets until we reach a more normal interest rate environment. That was the message delivered by JPMorgan (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon to delegates at the Fortune Global Forum in Chengdu, China on Thursday.
"It's a different world when central banks are MOREJun 6, 2013 5:15 AM ET
The SEC showed up late to the social media party with its new guidance, and investors now have more questions than answers about how companies can share material information.
By Cyrus Sanati
FORTUNE -- Wall Street will need a bit more clarity on the SEC's new social media policy before anyone feels comfortable enough to hit the "like" button. While many on the Street accept that social media has become a MOREApr 4, 2013 12:29 PM ET
SEC identifies social media problem, but fails to propose adequate solution.
FORTUNE -- Netflix (NFLX) CEO Reed Hastings got into some hot water with the SEC last year for revealing what may have been material company information via his Facebook page. At the time, I argued that the Wells Notice was warranted:
Investors in publicly-traded companies should not need to crawl all corners of the Internet to discover material information. Such data should be MOREDan Primack - Apr 2, 2013 3:52 PM ET
Investment firms without a strict policy about personal use of Twitter, blogs, Facebook and LinkedIn should beware. The feds may determine that social media use is the financial firms' responsibility.
By Moshe Silver, Hedgeye
You never know when something you write will resurface -- or in what context, or with what consequences. Amazingly, even after the damning emails have surfaced from nearly every major financial scandal in recent history, this bears repeating, MOREMar 8, 2011 11:35 AM ET
|Why casino workers hate Obamacare|
|Five predictions for the World Wide Web that were way, way, way off|
|Netflix faster on Comcast, following deal|
|Social Security is the best deal|
|The Deep Web you don't know about|