FORTUNE -- We can learn a lot from anniversaries. Consider, if you will, the upcoming fifth anniversary of the bottom of the stock market, which hit its low on March 9, 2009 as share prices plummeted and many holders ran screaming for the exit as predictions of the end of financial and investment life as we had known it filled the air.
Since then, U.S. stocks have almost tripled in value, according to the Wilshire 5000 index, the best measure of the total U.S. market. The value of Americans' home equity is up sharply, too -- but nowhere near as much as stocks have risen. And thereby hangs a little-noticed tale of how people at or near the top of the economic food chain have profited substantially more from the stock and housing rebounds than other people have.
No, this isn't a screed about the evils, real and imagined, of income and wealth inequality. I'm just telling you what the numbers showed me when I decided to compare the rebound in homeowners' equity, which is the biggest source of wealth for broad swatches of Americans, with the rebound of stocks, which is the biggest source of wealth for only a relatively small handful of Americans, primarily those with high net worths. And, I assume, high incomes.
My wealth numbers come from Federal Reserve surveys of households' net worth. I've tweaked some of the Fed's statistics, which it releases quarterly, to estimate values for stocks on Market Bottom Day in 2009, and for stocks and home equity today. (You can find my methodology at the bottom of this column.)
The Fed excludes mutual funds and retirement accounts from its stock numbers, and I don't think that including them would change the numbers in any meaningful way, given how concentrated stock ownership is. For example, economist Robert Frank of Cornell estimates that 5% of Americans own 60% of all individual stocks.
And here we go.
When last I looked, the Wilshire 5000 -- the broadest measure of the U.S. stock market -- was up about 190% from the bottom. During the same five-year period, the value of home equity has risen by about 40%. That's about $3 trillion, which isn't chopped liver. But it's little more than a third as much as the $8.8 trillion increase in Americans' holdings of stocks (as we're measuring them here).
Five years ago, at the stock market bottom, home equity, at $7.4 trillion, substantially exceeded the value of stocks owned by individuals ($4.4 trillion). Now, stocks are about $13.2 trillion, compared with $10.4 trillion of home equity.
After bottoming on March 9, 2009, stocks roared up -- by the end of the month, they had risen about 18% -- and have pretty much kept going. Meanwhile, home equity kept drifting down until the middle of 2012, when it finally turned upward.
Stocks have set one new high after another, while home equity is still down from its peak of $12.5 trillion in 2005. At the time, stocks were $8 trillion, about 65% of home equity. Now, stocks are more than 125% of home equity.
The bottom line: The rising tide in stocks and home equity is floating all boats -- but the boats with lots of stocks in them are floating higher a lot quicker.
Where my numbers come from:
On March 9, 2009, the Wilshire 5000 closed at 84.5% of its value on March 30 of that year. So I subtracted 15% from the Fed's March 30, 2009 stock ownership number to come up with a March 9 number.
Similarly, I compared the Wilshire's value in late February with its value on Sept. 30, 2013, the date of the most recent Fed numbers. The Wilshire has risen about 10% since Sept. 30, so I added about 10% to the Fed's Sept. 30 number.
(I didn't take net purchases and sales of stocks, as reported by the Fed, into account; there are only so many numbers I can cope with without having my head explode.)
The Fed numbers include Americans' holdings of both U.S. and foreign stocks, while the Wilshire measures only U.S. stocks. But I doubt that a more elaborate estimation method than my simplistic use of the Wilshire 5000 would make a substantial difference in the findings.
I used the Fed's March 30, 2009 number as my starting point, because I have no idea how to estimate home equity value three weeks earlier. I came up with my current estimate for home equity by taking the Sept. 30, 2013 number, adding $700 billion, and rounding up. That $700 billion assumes that home equity has continued rising since last Sept. 30 at the same monthly rate that it increased between June 30 and Sept. 30.
My stock and equity numbers come from two lines -- corporate equities, and owners' equity in household real estate -- in the Fed's Balance Sheet of Households and Nonprofit Organizations.
Global markets -- particularly emerging ones -- have been looking increasingly uncertain of late. But turmoil can mean opportunity.
By Lauren Silva Laughlin; graphics by Nicolas Rapp
FORTUNE -- The Polar Vortex may not have been the most spine-chilling storm this frigid winter. For many investors, that moment came in late January, when indexes ranging from the S&P 500 (SPX) to the MSCI Emerging Markets dropped 5% in a matter of days MOREFeb 27, 2014 5:00 AM ET
People are living longer. So how much should you sock away?
By Jean Chatzky
FORTUNE -- The most frightening billboard I saw in recent months ran along the Westside Highway in Manhattan. From the good folks at Prudential, it read: The First Person To Live To 150 Is Alive Today, with the subhead, Plan For A Longer Retirement. A few weeks later, our sister publication, Time Magazine, followed in tandem, asking the question on its MOREFeb 26, 2014 10:00 AM ET
In an exclusive excerpt from his upcoming shareholder letter, Warren Buffett looks back at a pair of real estate purchases and the lessons they offer for equity investors.
By Warren Buffett
FORTUNE -- "Investment is most intelligent when it is most businesslike." --Benjamin Graham, The Intelligent Investor
It is fitting to have a Ben Graham quote open this essay because I owe so much of what I know about investing to him. MOREFeb 24, 2014 5:00 AM ET
The price of gold and gold miner stocks are highly correlated, but the decline in stock prices in recent years has far outpaced the decline in the price of the actual metal.Christopher Matthews - Feb 20, 2014 9:29 AM ET
Target-date funds did well in 2013 for all the wrong reasons.Stephen Gandel, senior editor - Feb 18, 2014 5:00 AM ET
The U.S. economy may still be fragile, but prices are indeed rising.
By Moshe Silver
FORTUNE -- Believe it or not, commodity prices are breaking out right now as other inflationary pressures continue to build. Don't believe it? Take a look at gold prices. They have already risen over 7% year-to-date as the S&P 500 (SPX) has fallen 1.5%. Meanwhile, the CRB Commodity Index is up 4% year-to-date.
Something is stirring here, MOREFeb 13, 2014 12:08 PM ET
The panic-driven selloff has led to the buying opportunity of a lifetime.
FORTUNE -- Never underestimate the impulse for Wall Street market strategists and pundits to spin an outbreak of sudden fear into a durable trend, with a sensible-sounding narrative to back it up. So it is today with the sharp selloff in emerging market stocks and bonds. For champions of U.S. equities, indeed, the panic overseas seems a timely gift. MOREShawn Tully, senior editor-at-large - Feb 3, 2014 5:00 AM ET
Buyer beware. A single year in which stocks soared and bonds tanked can throw the long-term numbers way out of whack.
FORTUNE -- Today let's have some fun with numbers. The kind that investors rely on. Which turn out to be the kind that can be skewed by their start or end dates, and that can skewer your investment portfolio if you follow them blindly.
Let's start with a key number, the MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Jan 15, 2014 5:00 AM ET
Already at record levels, corporate profits aren't likely to boost the S&P 500.Shawn Tully, senior editor-at-large - Jan 13, 2014 5:00 AM ET
|NJ agrees to ban Tesla direct sales|
|Five predictions for the World Wide Web that were way, way, way off|
|76% of Americans are living paycheck-to-paycheck|
|Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac stock hit by proposal to close them|
|West prepares sanctions against Russia over Ukraine|