By Eileen Appelbaum
FORTUNE -- With the annual tax deadline approaching next week, middle class Americans may be wondering how private equity titans like Mitt Romney get away with such low tax rates on their millions in income. The answer is that private equity firms are treated as passive investors in the companies they buy and -- unlike you and me -- partners in these firms are taxed at the lower capital gains rate (typically 20%) on most of their income. But are private equity firms merely investors, or are PE partners active managers and employers of their acquired companies?
The Internal Revenue Service recently established a taskforce to review the way private equity is taxed. At issue is the question of whether PE funds are similar to mutual funds or whether they are in the business of buying, developing, and then selling companies at a profit -- much as real estate developers buy properties and develop them for resale to customers. Much hinges on the answer.
In our new book, Private Equity at Work: When Wall Street Manages Main Street, Cornell University Professor Rosemary Batt and I show that private equity is a different breed of investor. The partners in a PE firm do much more than simply decide which companies their funds should acquire. They decide how much debt to use in acquiring the company, and this debt structure drives the management plan the company is required to follow. The management plan sets the strategic direction of the company -- which units to sell off or shut down; whether to demand wage and benefit concessions to cover payments on the new debt; whether to replace top managers loyal to the company and its creditors and employees with new managers loyal to the PE firm; and who should sit on the company's board of directors.
What's more, the general partner (GP) oversees hiring and compensation practices, participates in labor negotiations, decides whether to exit an employee pension plan, collects fees from the company for advisory and consulting services, and may require the company to pay dividends to the PE fund partners (its shareholders) out of current cash flow or by selling junk bonds to raise funds for a dividend recapitalization.
As the cases in our book illustrate, PE firms actively manage the companies they acquire. Yet the courts and the tax authorities have long treated private equity partners as passive investors and not active managers, exempting them from laws and regulations that apply to other businesses. For example, under current interpretations of laws, they are exempt from the Worker Adjustment and Retaining Notification (WARN) Act that governs notification of employees in case of a plant shutdown. Partners at private equity firms and at the funds they sponsor are also exempt from the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) that governs treatment of a pension plan in case of bankruptcy, as well as provisions of the tax code that govern the tax liabilities of a trade or business.
This happy state of affairs for private equity was abruptly upended last July by a surprise appeals court ruling in a pension case involving PE firm Sun Capital Partners. Less than two years after the firm was acquired by brass and copper manufacturer Scott Brass in a leveraged buyout, the company declared bankruptcy and stopped making payments to the employees' pension fund. The question before the appeals court was whether Sun Capital and its funds were passive investors and not liable for a $4.5 million payment to the pension fund or were actively engaged in managing Scott Brass and should be treated as engaged in a "trade or business" under ERISA
The appeals court last year ruled that Sun Capital was engaged in a trade or business, a move that could have far-reaching tax implications for partners at PE funds; it could cost them billions of dollars more. As for the payment to the employee pension fund, a final decision on that has been returned to the lower court. Sun Capital owns 100% of Scott Brass but divided this ownership between two of its funds, neither of which individually owns at least 80% of the company as required under ERISA to be obligated to make the pension payment.
Three major changes could follow if the IRS finds that a PE fund is engaged in a trade or business: First, the profits earned through buying and selling portfolio companies would be taxed as ordinary income rather than at the lower capital gains rate. Second, tax-exempt limited partners could owe taxes for unrelated business income on the PE fund's profits. And third, foreign investors who currently aren't taxed in the U.S. could be taxed as effectively connected with a trade or business in this country.
The facts on the ground belie private equity's claim that it is merely a passive investment vehicle. Ending the charade would ensure that private equity partners are treated the same way as other businesses. It's unclear whether Congress is ready to engage with the private equity industry over tax fairness, but perhaps the IRS, which is in charge of interpreting the tax code in a fair and consistent manner, will take on the job of ending the special tax breaks the industry currently enjoys.
Eileen Appelbaum is a senior economist with the Center for Economic and Policy Research and a co-author of the forthcoming book, Private Equity at Work: When Wall Street Manages Main Street.
Why tax experts believe Rep. Dave Camp's proposal is misguided. (And, no, this article isn't totally self-serving.)
FORTUNE -- On April 2, Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, released his eagerly awaited vision of tax reform, a draft bill 979 pages in length that's taken three years to prepare. Camp's stated goal is to make today's fiendishly complex tax code simpler and fairer. But one MOREShawn Tully, senior editor-at-large - Apr 4, 2014 5:00 AM ET
U.S. Congressman Dave Camp's tax reform plan could tighten a 1993 law that opened the floodgates.
By Steven Clifford
FORTUNE – As part of an effort to revamp America's complex tax code, U.S. Congressman Dave Camp last week proposed to curb CEO pay by tightening a tax giveaway created in the 1990s. Perhaps unexpected for a Republican, Camp's plan would raise $12.1 billion in taxes over 10 years by prohibiting U.S. companies MOREMar 5, 2014 10:43 AM ET
The beaches are inviting, but Puerto Rico's political risks and its high crime rate should make wealthy tax-dodging Americans think twice before moving.
By Cyrus Sanati
FORTUNE -- John Paulson and other plutocrats should think twice before moving to Puerto Rico in search of a tax break. While the Caribbean Island's recent push to lure wealthy individuals from the U.S. mainland seems like a great deal, there is no guarantee that MOREMar 12, 2013 10:31 AM ET
It's easy to predict gloom and doom for the U.S. economy. But strong growth and job recovery are no pie-in-the-sky fantasies.
By Geoff Colvin, senior editor-at-large
FORTUNE -- In your sleep you can name 10 reasons 2013 will be lousy for business and the economy. So can I. But analyzing only the downside is a bad habit; missing a boom is at least as dangerous as missing a bust. So let's MOREJan 18, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Whether or not the president and lawmakers reel us in from the fiscal cliff, the tax debate is sure to keep going.
By Becky Quick, contributor
FORTUNE -- It's an argument as old as politics itself: How do we responsibly finance the system of government that provides the basic framework of our society? Taxation without representation was at the core of forming this country. Now the rate and distribution of taxes MOREDec 7, 2012 5:00 AM ET
The President, key conservatives, and even some of the nation's biggest corporations are leaning toward trading special breaks for lower rates.
By Nina Easton, senior editor-at-large
FORTUNE -- The economy coughs and sputters and threatens to stall out -- again. Growth slows; unemployment ticks back up to 8.3%. Congress shamelessly convenes a five-week recess, while the President camps out under the comforting applause of the campaign trail.
The absurdity of Washington's inaction MOREAug 29, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Our tax system helped get us into our economic mess. Now it can help get us out.
By Sheila Bair, contributor
FORTUNE -- As we undertake the annual mind-numbing rite of filling out our tax returns, let us pause to reflect on the role our tax code played in the financial crisis.
What brought us the crisis? Overly leveraged financial institutions made high-yield mortgages to overly leveraged consumers. Financial institutions then concocted trillions of MOREMar 5, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Investment managers have held on to it for years, but 'carried interest' carries an odious loophole that needs to go.
FORTUNE -- Politics has moments when it's actually useful. Case in point is the uproar over Mitt Romney's tax returns, which may help rid us of a small but noxious and symbolic loophole worth several billion dollars a year to managers of investment partnerships.
I'm talking about "carried interest" -- finance-speak for MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Feb 8, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Done right, a flat tax can make the U.S. more competitive and help working people. So let's stop making it so partisan.
By Geoff Colvin, senior editor-at-large
FORTUNE -- Here's the bottom line on the hottest issue in the presidential campaign: A flat tax, done right, is a good idea. Herman Cain's 9-9-9 plan is definitely not a good idea. Rick Perry's plan is better but a bit murky. We'll be hearing much MORENov 8, 2011 5:00 AM ET
|Ousted Yahoo exec gets $58 million golden parachute|
|Canadians arrest a Heartbleed hacker|
|US Airways won't fire worker who sent lewd tweet|
|Obama would cut deficits by another $1 trillion|
|Hybrid laundromat-cafes are popping up across the country|