FORTUNE -- As Wall Street predictions go, Jamais Cascio had a good one. A little less than a year ago, Cascio, a distinguished fellow at think tank Institute for the Future, in a blog post, predicted that retweeting Twitter bots combined with a fake news story posted by hackers on a major media website would cause a market crash. That's pretty close to what happened.
By now, you probably know about the so-called Tweet Retreat. On Tuesday, the market dropped 140 points within minutes of a fake tweet about a bombing at the White House. It came from the AP, which said it was hacked. The market recovered just as fast.
Nonetheless, the micro-crash added a new worry to those who are concerned that a glitch in the increasing number of computers trading stocks at lightning-fast speeds will sink the market and erase our retirement accounts: High-frequency reading.
In fact, Wall Street's computers have been "reading" the news for a while. Dow Jones and Thomson Reuters (TRI) both offer services that convert their news articles into a digitized form that can be fed into computer trading algorithms. They do this by tagging individual words and then assigning a sentiment ranking to those words. The computers add up those sentiment ranks to determine if the news is negative or positive for a particular company or the stock market in general. A sentence with the words bombing, White House, Obama, and injured would presumably get a pretty negative rating.
Back in 2009, Streambase, a company that provides technology to high-speed trading firms, began giving its clients the ability to incorporate tweets into their trading programs that decide when to automatically buy or sell. It's not clear whether the Dow Jones and Reuters services include twitter in their digitized news feeds. Bloomberg recently began incorporating tweets into its terminals. Last year, at a Wall Street technology conference, Harvard professor Chris Malloy estimated that nearly one-third of all high-frequency trading firms were evaluating whether to include such things as news articles along with traditional market data into their computer trading algorithms.
So it's likely that the computers of a good number of high-speed trading firms "read" the fake White House bombing tweet.
Still, it's unlikely that computers were the ones that started Tuesday's micro-crash. The fake tweet went out 1:07 PM and 50 seconds. According to Eric Hunsader, who runs market research firm Nanex, the first high-frequency trading firms didn't react to the fake tweet until 15 seconds after that. Most algorithms are written to respond to data within milliseconds. What's more, most only respond to specific market-moving news events, like the monthly jobs number.
So Hunsader thinks humans made the first trades based on the fake tweet. Nonetheless, computer trading algorithms, trained to follow the market, likely piled into the selling once it got started. Hunsader says that computer trading systems may have incorporated the potentially bad news into their algorithms. When actual selling began to occur, those systems were primed and headed for the exits faster than usual. The result: Hunsader says 20% of the market's trading volume disappeared in 20 seconds, a faster retreat than what was seen in the flash crash of a few years ago.
"It tells me that the diversity of traders in the market is gone," says Hunsader. "Just a bunch of machines that act like lemmings."
But given the fact that the market rebounded, as it had done in the past, it's hard to tell who got hurt. Mutual funds are trading all the time, slowly working through their large orders. High-frequency traders, Hunsader says, prey on mutual funds and other slow-moving traders. Events like the Twitter crash allow them to really take advantage.
"High-frequency traders are always taking portions of pennies away all the time. In this case they were able to take a whole bunch of whole pennies at once," says Hunsader. And Hunsader said that's typical in the market today. "No one really gets killed in these micro-crashes, but there are a lot of paper cuts."
Worse, Hunsader says high-frequency trading firms are likely to view the Twitter crash as an opportunity. Now that they have seen how fast a tweet, even an erroneous one, can move the market, traders are sure to do what they can to capitalize on it next time.
"If anything, this is likely to accelerate the development cycle of [reading] technology," says Hunsader. "In the future, the impact of a false tweet could be a lot worse."
If you want a stock trading strategy to work, keep it to yourself.
FORTUNE -- Academics are very good at identifying characteristics that can predict stock performance. They also are good at publicizing their findings. And therein lies the problem.
Professors David McLean (MIT) and Jeffrey Pontiff (Boston College) set out to learn what happens after academic papers on new trading strategies are published, and found that the strategies quickly lose efficacy.
"Our results MOREDan Primack - Nov 2, 2012 11:57 AM ET
The SEC goes after dark pools and finds its first target in Pipeline Trading, a network run by a former Nasdaq president.
FORTUNE -- If you own 10 million shares of a company, it'll be pretty obvious if you want to sell them all. For that reason mutual funds like to divvy up their trades among what are known as dark pools. Dark pools are private trading networks where big institutions MOREBrendan Coffey, Contributor - Oct 25, 2011 11:35 AM ET
Every day traders play the VIX -- the market's fear index. But the Chicago Board Options Exchange wins whether it's up or down.
FORTUNE -- When traders want to know if the sky is falling, they look to the VIX index. It's Wall Street's greatest fear gauge. Technically the index tracks stock options to gauge the market's expected swings both up and down. But mostly it grabs the attention of investors MOREScott Cendrowski, writer-reporter - Aug 11, 2011 3:38 PM ET
Corn prices are popping again, but there is a morsel of good news too for those who fear corn flakes inflation.
Corn futures surged 3% in trading Thursday after the government slashed its corn planting forecast and raised its price projection. The Agriculture Department now expects corn to fetch a record $6 to $7 a bushel this year, which is 50 cents above its previous forecast.
The latest spike shows "the balance sheet MOREColin Barr - Jun 9, 2011 12:06 PM ET
The casino isn't paying off the way it used to for the big banks, but don't count them out just yet.
So says Sanford Bernstein analyst Brad Hintz. He says Goldman Sachs (GS), JPMorgan (JPM) and their peers are headed for another profitable quarter, but warns that trading riches are making themselves scarce.
"Trading volumes look a little light," Hintz said Monday on Bloomberg Television. "Will trading be a much smaller business MOREColin Barr - Mar 7, 2011 3:22 PM ET
As regulators start to scrutinize the proposed combination of the NYSE and the Deutsche Börse, they'll need to take into account much more than just equity trading.
By Cyrus Sanati, contributor
The battle for the soul of Wall Street continues as the fate of the New York Stock Exchange remains up in the air. The NYSE's tentative $10 billion sale to Germany's Deutsche Börse will need to pass through a regulatory gauntlet MOREMar 2, 2011 10:13 AM ET
The mass affluent aren't as affluent as they're cracked up to be.
That's one conclusion you might draw from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch survey released Monday. The bank is pushing a Web-based trading and advice service called Merrill Edge. It's pitched at educated, online-savvy customers with investable assets of between $100,000 and $250,000.
That sounds like a decent-size nest egg and, by extension, a potential gold mine for BofA's wealth managers. MOREColin Barr - Jan 24, 2011 10:53 AM ET
With regulatory and political landscapes evolving, change is afoot for hedge funds. But will their performance change for the better?
This has been a relatively blah year for hedge funds. Sure there have been pockets of excitement -- there was Timberwolf, the so-called "shitty deal" brought to us by Goldman Sachs (GS), there was the story of the hedge fund wife's inspirational piano playing pig, and of course, there's the ongoing insider MOREKatie Benner - Dec 28, 2010 12:07 PM ET
Goldman Sachs' trading desk wasn't quite perfect in the third quarter, but it was close.
The firm made money trading in 66 of the 68 days in the quarter, Goldman (GS) said Tuesday in its quarterly report filed with regulators.
That's not as good as the first quarter, in which Goldman (and others) ran the table, notching trading profits on every one of the period's 63 days. Goldman lost money on 10 MOREColin Barr - Nov 9, 2010 10:07 AM ET
|Stocks finish higher for fourth straight week|
|Oil-price manipulation: the next Libor?|
|Prison exclusive: Bernie Madoff can't sleep|
|Google says you'll know when Glass is sketchy|