By Daryl Jones, Hedgeye
FORTUNE -- Like many Americans nowadays, I tend to tune out much of the mainstream media, but I did catch myself watching a little CNBC recently. Interestingly, it made me realize that the buy side, sell side, and media are arguing with many of the same platitudes on the topic of the Federal Reserve tapering its bond-buying stimulus. In short, no one has any real conviction or strong insight. Their views are not having any impact.
In the land of bonds, of course, PIMCO'S Bill Gross is widely considered to be the impact player. And rightfully so. PIMCO is the world's largest bond investor and manages over $2 trillion in assets. Even if we don't agree with PIMCO's research or views (we often disagree), there can be no debate that the firm has the proven ability to impact asset prices in a meaningful reallocation.
So, what is the latest from the big bond boys on the taper? Well, this is what Gross wrote in his most recent monthly letter (which incidentally is usually a fun read ... ):
"The taper will lead to the elimination of QE at some point in 2014, but the 25 basis point policy rate will continue until 6.5% unemployment and 2.0% inflation at a minimum have been achieved. If so, front-end Treasury, corporate and mortgage positions should provide low but attractively defensive returns.
We have positioned our bond wars portfolio -- heavily front-end maturity loaded along with credit, volatility and curve steepening positions, with the aim of outperforming Vanguard as well as many other active managers."
In part, especially given PIMCO's sizable position, Gross' job is to influence and ensure the bond market doesn't shake, rattle, or roll in any direction that isn't beneficial to PIMCO. So for example, if you are Gross, you certainly want the incremental buyer to be focused on mortgage-backed securities (MBS).
Currently, $40 billion of the Fed's monthly purchases are in the MBS market. In aggregate, this is more than half a trillion in annual purchases of mortgage-backed securities. The impact of multiple rounds of QE has been that the premium of Agency MBS over Treasuries has narrowed by some ~50 basis points from pre-QE to post-QE.
Given that 34% of PIMCO's Total Return Fund (BOND) is in agency MBS, there is some serious interest rate risk in that position. By our estimation, a 50-basis point move in the spread of Agency MBS has the potential to lead to 5% downside in price. To the extent that 34% of PIMCO's "book" has the potential to be marked down 5%, that is a big deal for PIMCO and the associated market.
Reflexively, if PIMCO were to underperform, it would then be forced to liquidate MBS positions as investors exited their funds. In turn, this would amplify any move in price. A mass exit of PIMCO would be an "¡Ay, caramba!" moment in the MBS market to be sure.
On the longer end of the curve, specifically 10-year yields, tapering is getting somewhat priced in. In the chart below, we show this graphically by comparing 10-year yields, to the Fed Funds rate, to the Federal Reserve balance sheet. As you can see, 10-year yields are now back at a level not seen since early 2011, which pre-dated QE Infinity (i.e. the open ended purchases that began in September 2012).
In the hypothetical world where 10-year rates actually get priced based on economic fundamentals, the current spread of 2.6% between the 10-year yield and the Fed's discount rate may not be far off reality. For context, the average spread between the two over the last decade was about 1.7% and since 1954 0.54%. Certainly, the 100 basis points widening of this spread over the last year is indicative of some level of tapering being priced in.
This all leads to an interesting question: Will tapering be a "sell the news" moment for 10-year yields? That's a question I'll leave to the speculators and those that need to protect their book to answer.
One point that many pundits don't seem to be talking much about is that tapering will be positive for the U.S. Dollar, which has fallen five weeks in a row. This is further supported by a point we have been highlighting consistently -- that the Federal deficit has been narrowing. In the fiscal year ending 2013, the federal deficit was below $1 trillion for the first time since 2008.
This improvement continued into this fiscal year as the deficit in November was 21.4% lower than the previous November. In addition to this budget improvement, the fact that Congress seems to actually be functioning should also bode well for the U.S. Dollar.
In fact, the House and Senate announced a two-year budget deal. Even if the deal isn't ideal, our elected officials are (thankfully) at least getting out of the way and signaling to the world that they can functionally manage the country. From a deficit perspective, there will be $63 billion in increased spending (sequester relief) over the next two years, but that shouldn't impact the continued narrowing of federal budgets. It's amazing what our elected officials can accomplish when they get out of the way.
Just imagine what would happen if the unelected officials at the Fed got out of the way, the strong dollar American growth story would be fully in play!
Daryl Jones is Director of Research at Hedgeye Risk Management. You can follow him on Twitter @HedgeyeDJ
Markets may be calm as Congress struggles to raise the debt ceiling, but a U.S. default threatens the U.S. dollar's dominance in the world.
FORTUNE -- In a long-awaited breakthrough, Congress is inching closer to a deal that would increase the nation's borrowing limit and end a two-week-old government shutdown. The U.S. may just barely miss a default days before the U.S. Treasury exhausts its ability to borrow, but the sigh MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Oct 15, 2013 10:21 AM ET
If you think the JPMorgan and Wells Fargo earnings reports were disappointing, just wait until the fourth quarter if the shutdown continues and a debt default occurs.
By Cyrus Sanati
FORTUNE -- JPMorgan and Wells Fargo kicked off bank earnings season Friday morning reporting some less-than-stellar results. Weak loan volumes, shrinking net interest margins, legal mishaps, lackluster trading activity, and a lousy mortgage market wreaked havoc on the megabanks during the MOREOct 11, 2013 10:14 AM ET
China may be the biggest foreign holder of U.S. debt, but it won't meddle in Washington politics.
FORTUNE -- As Congress drags its feet against a looming deadline to increase the nation's borrowing limit or risk default, China urged Washington this week to act quickly and ensure the safety of its U.S. investments.
The message from the world's second-largest economy isn't surprising. As Chinese Vice Finance Minister Zhu Guangyao noted on Monday, China MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Oct 8, 2013 10:49 AM ET
What could go wrong on trading desks if the U.S. defaults on its debt? A lot.
FORTUNE -- Government officials used to see it as part of their job to calm the markets. Not anymore. Last week, President Obama and Treasury Secretary Jack Lew both said they thought Wall Street wasn't freaking out enough about the possibility of a debt ceiling default.
Right now, most of Wall Street appears to be betting MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Oct 7, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Traders are talking about the prospects of "dirty prices" and other default oddities.
FORTUNE -- On Thursday, the Treasury Department released a report anticipating what would happen if we have a debt ceiling default. One prediction: a financial crisis that could "echo the events of 2008 or even worse."
It's hard to see exactly how that could happen.
If Treasury bonds were to plummet after a debt default, that could cause other bonds MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Oct 4, 2013 9:49 AM ET
What a rigorous metric called "EVA" says about the value of stocks. Hint: it ain't pretty.
FORTUNE -- Forget P/Es. Trailing, forward, westward, or eastward, the venerable price-earnings ratio tells you little more about the value of a company than its marketing budget. Or (ugh!) its "consensus analyst rating."
The best measure of how companies perform for shareholders is a wonkish tool called Economic Value Added, or EVA. The advantage of EVA is MOREShawn Tully, senior editor-at-large - Aug 19, 2013 8:51 AM ET
Don't feel bad if you weren't aware of the recent plummet in long-term bond prices. Most everyone else missed it too.
FORTUNE -- We hear lots of talk about the bond market these days. So let me ask you a simple question: Do you think you'd notice if a key bond-market segment took a one-day hit equivalent to a 600-point drop in the Dow? Answer: No, you wouldn't. How do I MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Jul 25, 2013 5:00 AM ET
A historical look at periods when the 10-year Treasury yield spiked significantly should ease stock investors' worries.
FORTUNE – Interest rates are expected to soar further, but don't expect that to ruin the bull market in U.S. stocks.
The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note has risen sharply since May when the U.S. Federal Reserve hinted it may cut back on $85 billion in monthly bond purchases, a policy that's driven MORENin-Hai Tseng, Writer - Jul 11, 2013 10:29 AM ET
In times of turmoil, gold is considered a safe haven. So why is it still crashing now?
By Moshe Silver, Hedgeye
FORTUNE -- Gold is down more than 25% from its recent highs, leading some observers to declare it on track for its biggest one-quarter decline since the Bretton Woods system collapsed in 1971.
This is a bit misleading: the average price of gold in 1971 was around $40 an ounce. The following year MOREJul 8, 2013 2:38 PM ET
|Michaels hack hit 3 million|
|Wealthy investors flock to fine art funds|
|Detroit pension cuts hit civilian workers hardest|
|Obama would cut deficits by another $1 trillion|
|GM's recalled Cobalt was a failure from the start|