FORTUNE -- This is what you call kicking 'em when they're down.
Consumers who don't have a lot of cash to put down when buying a house usually have to pay a higher rate than typical borrowers for the first few years of their mortgage. Now, thanks to a change at a government program, they will have to pay that elevated rate for as long as 30 years.
This is apparently how the Federal Housing Administration plans to shore up its finances.
Lenders generally require borrowers to take out mortgage insurance when they don't put down 20% of a home's purchase price or have 20% equity when refinancing their mortgage. The FHA is the nation's largest insurer of low down payment home loans.
Starting next month, the FHA will begin requiring borrowers who take out their insurance to pay premiums as long as they have their mortgage. For the past decade, the FHA has allowed borrowers to cancel the policy when their loan balance drops to 78% of the value of their home, therefore eliminating the need for mortgage insurance.
At today's rates, with a 5% down payment, that would take 7 years.
The change is part of a broader plan to boost the finances of the FHA, which some say is deeply in the hole. Last month, the FHA raised its insurance premium. Now someone getting a loan with FHA mortgage insurance on average pays a 4.7% interest rate for a 30-year fixed rate loan, vs. 3.4% for borrowers putting down 20%.
But the biggest boost to FHA's finances will come from making its insurance premium permanent. FHA officials recently estimated that change would have locked in $10 billion in additional fees for the FHA on mortgages it has insured in the past three years alone. That's also the additional amount borrowers will have to pay over the life of their loans.
The problem is the FHA is going to be forcing borrowers to pay for the insurance long after they need it. Private mortgage insurers are required by law to cancel borrowers' policies once they have hit the 20% home ownership threshold. But the FHA is specifically exempted from the law.
And it's not even clear the FHA needs the money.
Recently, the Obama administration estimated in its budget that the FHA might need about $943 million in the next fiscal year to cover its expenses. That excludes any gains the agency may have from legal settlements, which have been significant recently. But almost all of that $943 million is for expected losses in the FHA's reverse mortgage program, which is not affected by the extension of the premium payments.
With home prices rising again and the economy improving, the finances of the FHA's traditional lending program have improved dramatically. They could continue to improve ... if not for the fact that the FHA may now be stuck with the riskiest borrowers and all of the losses thanks to the premium hikes. Indeed, private mortgage insurance companies have already started advertising campaigns around the FHA's recent increase in rates, saying borrowers can get a better deal elsewhere.
Nonetheless, some argue that the FHA should do whatever it can to improve its finances, even just to eliminate the perception that the agency needs a bailout.
"Rebuilding the FHA's capital base is the fairest thing you can do for borrowers," says Bill Apgar, a Harvard University professor and former FHA commissioner who was at the agency in 2001 when it began automatically canceling borrowers' policies. He notes that despite problems, the FHA weathered the financial crisis better than its rivals. "Modeling FHA to what private insurers do might not be a relevant benchmark."
But the FHA has more private competitors than it once had. Also, throughout most of the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, borrowers who took out loans with FHA insurance could refinance into new loans after a few years, eliminating the insurance and lowering their monthly payments. With interest rates at historic lows it's unlikely that option will be available to FHA borrowers today.
The biggest problem we have today in the housing market, and perhaps the economy in general, is that despite the drop in prices, first-time home buyers remain relatively rare. Making it even harder to get on to the entry ramp for the housing market won't help the economy or the FHA's finances.
Update: An earlier version of this story said that under the FHA's current policy rising home prices would allow borrowers to cancel their FHA's insurance policy faster. Actually, rising home prices are not factored in.
Two new charges may not affect middle-class taxpayers now, but left unchecked, they will.
FORTUNE -- Okay, middle-class taxpayers: Listen up. Our national government in Washington is screwing you again. This time the screwing involves the way that two new income tax surcharges, supposedly designed to affect only the "rich," will reach deeper and deeper into the middle class unless something is done now to rein them in.
I'm talking about the MOREAllan Sloan, senior editor-at-large - Feb 27, 2013 5:00 AM ET
The president didn't offer much comfort to the manager and owners of American businesses who complain that high tax rates, strangling regulation, and health care reform are thwarting investment in American jobs.Feb 13, 2013 10:25 AM ET
President Obama's pick for SEC chair has a lot of experience prosecuting Wall Street crime. We could have used that four years ago.
FORTUNE -- Mary Jo White, President Obama's nominee to be the next head of the Securities and Exchange Commission, is certainly a great choice for the SEC. The question is whether she is the right pick for the rest of us.
There clearly remains a perception issue that the MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 24, 2013 3:42 PM ET
Some companies say the threat of a disaster brought on by a standoff in Washington actually boosted business in the fourth quarter.
FORTUNE -- It's conventional wisdom these days that Washington gridlock is the main thing holding back the economy. But the fiscal standoffs may not be as much of a headwind as people think. In fact, they might be good for the economy.
On Friday, Wells Fargo's CFO Tim Sloan said MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 15, 2013 8:00 AM ET
President Obama's pick for Treasury Secretary may not be a Wall Streeter's dream, but he's not their worst nightmare either.
FORTUNE -- On the day reports surfaced that Tim Geithner would be nominated for Treasury Secretary back in November 2008, the Dow Jones industrial average surged 494 points. On Wednesday, Obama indicated that he would nominate Jack Lew to replace Geithner. The market shrugged, with most of its modest gains coming MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jan 10, 2013 8:02 AM ET
Goldman's head of asset management says investors are starting to think that Europe is doing a better job dealing with debt than U.S.
FORTUNE -- Jim O'Neill, the chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, says President Obama and Republicans have another three weeks to make a budget deal. He says if there isn't a deal to avoid the fiscal cliff by inauguration day, which is officially January 20th, the market will MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Dec 28, 2012 5:00 AM ET
If uncertainty were the issue it would already be slowing hiring. It's not.
FORTUNE -- Earlier this year, economists seemed convinced that even the very threat of the fiscal cliff would send the U.S. plunging into recession. Less than a month away, the economy still appears to be climbing.
The best piece of evidence yet that the fiscal cliff - the massive mix of tax increase and spending cuts that are set MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Dec 7, 2012 1:43 PM ET
Low interest rates and a slow recovery are here to stay.
FORTUNE - If Wall Street hates the fact that President Obama will get four more years in the White House, someone forgot to tell the bond market.
The yield on 10-year Treasuries fell to 1.64% from 1.75%. Bond prices, which move in the opposite direction of yields, were up. That's a big one-day move for the bond market, though Treasury prices MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Nov 7, 2012 11:52 AM ET
Top U.S. economist thinks Washington uncertainty will stall second half.
Fortune -- The fiscal cliff could push us into recession, and the fall could happen sooner than many think. At least that's the view of Bank of America's top U.S. economist Ethan Harris.
Most economists have been focused on the direct impact the series of tax increases and government spending cuts scheduled to kick in January 1 could have on the economy. MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Jun 20, 2012 12:17 PM ET
|Google files First Amendment court case against NSA surveillance secrecy|
|Chrysler relents, agrees to recall 2.7 million Jeeps|
|Perils of moving to a no-tax state|
|Stocks rally as Fed looms large|
|Yahoo: 13,000 government requests for data|