By Navin Thukkaram
FORTUNE -- Last month, Facebook set the tech world ablaze with its $19 billion acquisition of messaging service WhatsApp, which is expected to reach 1 billion users in the next couple of years. Given the impressive numbers and reach, it's no surprise the company was acquired. The news received extensive media attention not only because of the scale of the deal, but also because acquisitions of mobile startups are relatively rare; the vast majority toil in relative obscurity. Which raises the question: Why do a few mobile startups, such as WhatsApp, achieve incredible outcomes while the majority fail?
To shed some light, let's first take a stroll through the Apple (AAPL) App store as a proxy for competition in the mobile sector. It's hard to imagine that when the App store launched in July 2008 there were less than 1,000 apps available for download. Late last year, the figure surpassed 1 million ... and growing. The level of competition for a new entrant is downright frightening. This partially explains why the majority of mobile startups fail, but it does not explain why the fortunate few succeed.
Before we discuss other blockbuster deals, such as Facebook's $1 billion Instagram acquisition or its $3 billion offer for Snapchat, let's start smaller. After all, exiting a mobile startup for any meaningful amount is a big win, given the thousands of apps entering the fray every year. Take Yahoo's 2012 acquisition of Stamped, an app that allowed users to track and share restaurants, books, and other things they liked with friends. After the acquisition, Yahoo (YHOO) shut down the app, and employees joined Yahoo's New York office, implying that Stamped was acquired purely for its talent.
This further confirms that recruiting a solid engineering team is a key first step to creating potential acquisition value. In fact, most mobile deals are "acqui-hires," where the buyer hires the startup's employees and incents them to stay with the buyer by granting them stock, which typically vests over three to four years. This type of deal usually gets done for under $10 million. Technology giants like Google or Yahoo use acqui-hires to grab talent that would otherwise be difficult to attract, since hiring experienced iOS or Android developers can be next to impossible in hot markets like the Bay Area or New York City. Acquirers even talk in terms of "dollars per engineer" and "dollars per employee" as valuation metrics.
But a few million dollars is a far cry from the billion-dollar valuations necessary to acquire the world's most dominant mobile platforms. So then, how can a founder increase the value of her startup? The natural next step after hiring the right talent is to build solid technology. Investing in a clean, scalable codebase that can easily be integrated into a buyer's technology stack can reap huge rewards.
Take for instance Yahoo's acquisition last year of Summly, a mobile news aggregation app founded by 17-year-old British entrepreneur Nick D'Aloisio. Yahoo paid roughly $30 million, a steep price if it only sought to acquire the startup's small team. However, shortly after shutting down Summly as a stand-alone app, Yahoo incorporated the acquired technology into its own flagship mobile app; the transaction was driven by the relevance and quality of the technology that Summly had created.
Talent and technology are critical factors in any mobile deal, but a great product can also deliver significant acquisition value. While dozens of apps fought to become the "Instagram for video," three notable mobile startups not only achieved significant exits, but also had their products live on after acquisition. Twitter (TWTR) was so impressed with the Vine beta product that it bought the startup for $30 million even before it launched and launched Vine itself. Today, Vine has over 40 million users. Socialcam, another video-sharing app, was sold to Autodesk in 2012 for $60 million. Qwiki, an app that automatically creates brief movies from a user's iPhone media, was acquired by Yahoo for $50 million last year. As indicated by the exit values, these mobile startups were rewarded for creating products that buyers wanted to keep alive and grow.
While the right team, solid technology, and a great product can make a mobile startup very valuable, a strong user base takes it to the next level. Of course, very few startups attract a user base large enough to give the big boys a run for their money.
When Facebook (FB) announced the acquisition of Instagram for $1 billion in April 2012, the mainstream media seemed incredulous that a company with only 13 employees could be acquired for such a sum. Of course, the company had much more than just a strong team -- it had a young, active, and growing user base of 30 million people. With the added bonus for Facebook of eliminating a competitor shortly before its IPO, Instagram pulled off an epic exit. With the benefit of hindsight, it appears that Facebook got a pretty good deal. Today, Instagram has an estimated 180 million monthly active users and is one of the dominant mobile photo and video-sharing platforms on the planet.
Revenue generation potential also helps a mobile startup achieve a substantial exit, although whether it actually generates revenue may not impact valuation. Late last year, Facebook bid $3 billion for Snapchat, the popular messaging app that enables users to share self-destructing photos and videos. Snapchat has a large, young, predominantly female, engaged, and growing user base but currently no revenue. That said, it appears the revenue potential of the company drove the sizeable valuation. Facebook is a public company that needs to demonstrate mobile revenue growth to increase its stock price, and Snapchat has a highly attractive and growing user base. Facebook has also proven it can generate significant revenue from mobile, recording $1.2 billion of mobile advertising revenues in the fourth quarter of 2013.
Presumably, an acquisition of Snapchat would be at least as successful as Instagram, which Facebook successfully monetized to the tune of $240 million to $485 million in projected revenue, according to Goldman Sachs. With this context, it's not surprising that Facebook believed acquiring Snapchat for $3 billion would be accretive. The rejection of the offer, however, clearly means that the founders of Snapchat believe it is worth even more.
When a founder contemplates positioning her mobile startup for a potential sale, it is critical to understand why an acquirer might purchase the company. Would the most likely buyers monetize a strong user base, for example, or would they be more focused on building a strong team? Or both? To optimize the chances of success, founders should focus on building the best company possible at each stage, whether the startup is just starting to build its team or it has progressed to the point of developing a sales strategy.WhatsApp famously spent $0 on marketing to potential users, believing instead that a well-engineered product markets itself. When a startup builds a solid foundation at each stage, it is not only more likely to fulfill its mission, but also more likely to pull off an epic exit.
Navin Thukkaram is a technology investor and former chief operating officer of Qwiki, which was acquired by Yahoo in 2013. Follow him @dreamnavin.
A small sweepstakes company in Dallas says the Internet company owes it $4.4 million for backing out of a contest that would have paid $1 billion to anyone who correctly picked the entire NCAA men's basketball tournament. Sound familiar?
FORTUNE -- Warren Buffett may have gotten an assist in coming up with his billion-dollar basketball bet.
In mid-January, Quicken Loans, along with Warren Buffett, announced it would pay $1 billion to anyone who MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Feb 3, 2014 4:53 PM ET
Berkshire Hathaway ended up partnering with Quicken Loans on one of history's largest-ever prizes for a perfect NCAA basketball bracket.
By Anne VanderMey, reporter
FORTUNE -- Last month's much-hyped $636 million "Mega Millions" jackpot has nothing on Warren Buffett's latest giveaway plan: $1 billion for the perfect NCAA bracket.
The prize -- $50 million bigger than the largest-ever lotto payout -- will go to the entrant who correctly predicts every winner in MOREJan 22, 2014 5:00 AM ET
Henrique de Castro lasts just 15 months as Yahoo's number two.
FORTUNE -- Henrique de Castro, the Yahoo (YHOO) chief operating officer known for his Google (GOOG) pedigree and massive compensation, is out.
The company announced in an SEC filing that tomorrow will be de Castro's last day, and did not provide any information about his successor.
De Castro joined Yahoo in late 2012 after a six year run at Google where his final MOREDan Primack - Jan 15, 2014 4:46 PM ET
A pair of moves by the Internet giant proves complicated financial transactions are still alive and well.
FORTUNE -- Wall Street deals haven't gotten any less convoluted since the financial crisis. We got some more evidence of that this week.
On Tuesday night, Yahoo announced it was raising $1 billion and at the same time buying back $5 billion worth of its own stock. Reporters covering the deal focused on the MOREStephen Gandel, senior editor - Nov 22, 2013 7:00 AM ET
Yahoo has now spent nearly $1.2 billion on acquisitions in 2013.
FORTUNE -- Yahoo Inc. (YHOO) today (barely) beat analyst expectations, reporting earnings of $0.34 per share and nearly $1.09 billion in revenue. The company also disclosed that it spent $163 million on eight acquisitions between July and September.
That's a far cry from the $1.03 billion spent on eight companies in Q2, highlighted by the massive Tumblr acquisition. But if you MOREDan Primack - Oct 15, 2013 4:26 PM ET
Google wants to partner with private equity on complicated deals. But there may be a better way.
FORTUNE -- Google Inc. may soon partner with private equity firms to acquire other companies, according to comments made yesterday by Google mergers and acquisitions chief Don Harrison.
But isn't there a better option? Like adding private equity veterans to Google's (GOOG) in-house corporate development team, like Yahoo (YHOO) has done?
Here was Harrison's explanation, as paraphrased by MOREDan Primack - Jun 19, 2013 12:45 PM ET
Reports of VC returns on Tumblr have been greatly exaggerated.
FORTUNE -- Yesterday there were several news reports about how Union Square Ventures had generated a "5,000% return" on its early investment in Tumblr, based on data from research firm Privco. They also claimed that Spark Capital's Bijan Sabet made $77 million for himself, in addition to whatever carry he's entitled to as a partner in the Spark Capital fund that invested alongside USV.
In MOREDan Primack - May 22, 2013 10:34 AM ET
Why we're paying attention to the wrong deal.
FORTUNE -- By now I'm sure you've heard about today's big merger news: Actavis (ACT) buying Warner Chilcott (WCRX).
Wait, did you think I was talking about Yahoo buying Tumblr? Here are some quick stats:Price being paid for Warner Chilcott: $8.8 billion Price being paid for Tumblr: $1.1 billion # of Warner Chilcott employees: 2,700 # of Tumblr employees: 175 Warner Chilcott 2012 revenue: $2.5 billion Tumblr 2012 MORE Dan Primack - May 20, 2013 2:12 PM ET
Yahoo is formally buying Tumblr, but it's really buying Tumblr's leader.
By Charlie O'Donnell
FORTUNE -- You can do the math on Tumblr's pageviews, throw in some expected CPM, weighted average cost of capital, and try to justify the $1.1 billion that Yahoo (YHOO) is spending on Tumblr.
I think you'd be kidding yourself if that's what this was all about. The Tumblr community isn't going anywhere, but that's really not the MOREMay 20, 2013 8:14 AM ET
|Water becoming more valuable than gold|
|Will 7 Apples a day keep the bears away? - The Buzz|
|Postal workers protest Staples|
|Tesla finds friends in the FTC|
|Don't assume you're safe from Heartbleed|